脚趾-肱骨指数的实用性

William Del Valle
{"title":"脚趾-肱骨指数的实用性","authors":"William Del Valle","doi":"10.1177/15443167241249246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The toe-brachial index is typically an adjunctive examination to the ankle-brachial index, which has long been the primary physiologic modality for diagnosing peripheral arterial disease. The goal of this project was to determine toe-brachial index reliability, particularly with patients with diabetes. We compared duplex ultrasound to the ankle-brachial index and toe-brachial index on 100 patients (200 legs) with suspected symptomatic peripheral arterial disease. Duplex ultrasound stenosis in the femoral/popliteal/infrapopliteal arteries was at least a doubling of velocity between adjacent segments. A blunted systolic Doppler waveform was consistent with proximal occlusive disease. Normal physiologic ranges were arbitrarily set as ankle-brachial index 1.2 to 0.9 and toe-brachial index 0.9 to 0.5. We calculated overall sensitivity/specificity values by averaging. Both physiologic modalities had overall low sensitivity (ankle-brachial index 62%, toe-brachial index 56%). In diabetics, ankle-brachial index sensitivity was 61% and toe-brachial index sensitivity was 57%. Sensitivity improved in the presence of inflow disease (ankle-brachial index 78%, toe-brachial index 63%). Both modalities had good overall specificity (ankle-brachial index 96%, toe-brachial index 86%). In patients with diabetes, the ankle-brachial index specificity was 94% and toe-brachial index specificity was 79%. Both physiologic modalities had identical accuracy (0.43) in comparison to duplex ultrasound. Routine toe-brachial index in conjunction with the ankle-brachial index may not be clinically productive.","PeriodicalId":52510,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Vascular Ultrasound","volume":" 14","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utility of Toe-Brachial Index\",\"authors\":\"William Del Valle\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15443167241249246\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The toe-brachial index is typically an adjunctive examination to the ankle-brachial index, which has long been the primary physiologic modality for diagnosing peripheral arterial disease. The goal of this project was to determine toe-brachial index reliability, particularly with patients with diabetes. We compared duplex ultrasound to the ankle-brachial index and toe-brachial index on 100 patients (200 legs) with suspected symptomatic peripheral arterial disease. Duplex ultrasound stenosis in the femoral/popliteal/infrapopliteal arteries was at least a doubling of velocity between adjacent segments. A blunted systolic Doppler waveform was consistent with proximal occlusive disease. Normal physiologic ranges were arbitrarily set as ankle-brachial index 1.2 to 0.9 and toe-brachial index 0.9 to 0.5. We calculated overall sensitivity/specificity values by averaging. Both physiologic modalities had overall low sensitivity (ankle-brachial index 62%, toe-brachial index 56%). In diabetics, ankle-brachial index sensitivity was 61% and toe-brachial index sensitivity was 57%. Sensitivity improved in the presence of inflow disease (ankle-brachial index 78%, toe-brachial index 63%). Both modalities had good overall specificity (ankle-brachial index 96%, toe-brachial index 86%). In patients with diabetes, the ankle-brachial index specificity was 94% and toe-brachial index specificity was 79%. Both physiologic modalities had identical accuracy (0.43) in comparison to duplex ultrasound. Routine toe-brachial index in conjunction with the ankle-brachial index may not be clinically productive.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52510,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal for Vascular Ultrasound\",\"volume\":\" 14\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal for Vascular Ultrasound\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15443167241249246\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Vascular Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15443167241249246","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

脚趾肱动脉指数通常是踝肱指数的辅助检查,而踝肱指数长期以来一直是诊断外周动脉疾病的主要生理模式。该项目的目的是确定趾肱指数的可靠性,尤其是糖尿病患者的可靠性。我们对 100 名疑似有症状的外周动脉疾病患者(200 条腿)进行了双相超声与踝肱指数和趾肱指数的比较。股动脉/腘动脉/胫骨下动脉的双工超声狭窄是指相邻节段之间的速度至少增加一倍。收缩期多普勒波形变钝与近端闭塞性疾病一致。正常生理范围被任意设定为脚踝肱动脉指数 1.2 至 0.9,脚趾肱动脉指数 0.9 至 0.5。我们通过平均值计算总体敏感性/特异性值。两种生理模式的总体灵敏度都较低(踝肱指数为 62%,趾肱指数为 56%)。在糖尿病患者中,踝肱指数的灵敏度为 61%,趾肱指数的灵敏度为 57%。如果存在血流疾病,灵敏度会有所提高(踝肱指数为 78%,趾肱指数为 63%)。两种模式的总体特异性都很好(踝肱指数为 96%,趾肱指数为 86%)。在糖尿病患者中,踝肱指数的特异性为 94%,趾肱指数的特异性为 79%。与双相超声相比,这两种生理模式的准确性(0.43)相同。将常规的趾肱指数与踝肱指数结合使用可能不会产生临床效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Utility of Toe-Brachial Index
The toe-brachial index is typically an adjunctive examination to the ankle-brachial index, which has long been the primary physiologic modality for diagnosing peripheral arterial disease. The goal of this project was to determine toe-brachial index reliability, particularly with patients with diabetes. We compared duplex ultrasound to the ankle-brachial index and toe-brachial index on 100 patients (200 legs) with suspected symptomatic peripheral arterial disease. Duplex ultrasound stenosis in the femoral/popliteal/infrapopliteal arteries was at least a doubling of velocity between adjacent segments. A blunted systolic Doppler waveform was consistent with proximal occlusive disease. Normal physiologic ranges were arbitrarily set as ankle-brachial index 1.2 to 0.9 and toe-brachial index 0.9 to 0.5. We calculated overall sensitivity/specificity values by averaging. Both physiologic modalities had overall low sensitivity (ankle-brachial index 62%, toe-brachial index 56%). In diabetics, ankle-brachial index sensitivity was 61% and toe-brachial index sensitivity was 57%. Sensitivity improved in the presence of inflow disease (ankle-brachial index 78%, toe-brachial index 63%). Both modalities had good overall specificity (ankle-brachial index 96%, toe-brachial index 86%). In patients with diabetes, the ankle-brachial index specificity was 94% and toe-brachial index specificity was 79%. Both physiologic modalities had identical accuracy (0.43) in comparison to duplex ultrasound. Routine toe-brachial index in conjunction with the ankle-brachial index may not be clinically productive.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal for Vascular Ultrasound
Journal for Vascular Ultrasound Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
期刊最新文献
The Thrill is Gone Indirect Duplex Ultrasound Diagnosis of Innominate Artery Occlusive Disease Fibromuscular Dysplasia in Vascular Ultrasound Relationship Between Diameter and Pelvic Vein Reflux Single-Center Retrospective Study on the Efficacy of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Detection of Endoleak After Endovascular Aortic Repair
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1