{"title":"梵蒂冈二世之前意大利教规学的宪法意识","authors":"Massimo del Pozzo","doi":"10.54103/1971-8543/23310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \nThe Constitutionalist Sensibility of Italian Canonists prior to Vatican II \n \n \n \nABSTRACT: The paper traces the main contributions of Italian canonists to canonical constitutionalism prior to Vatican II. Starting with Emmanuele de Sarzana’s textbook, it examines Giuseppe Forchielli’s proposal in the debate on the Ecclesiastical Law Archive and the approach of Bertola, Ragazzini and Ferrante’s texts. Special attention is paid to the foundations and contributions of the so-called Italian dogmatic school (Del Giudice, Giacchi, d’Avack and others). Systematic approach and dialogue with secular culture dispose to the acquisition of constitutionalist categories; however, mature and thoughtful elaborations of the modern constitutional approach are not yet found. Prior to the Second Vatican Council, the ecclesiological and conceptual premises (fundamental equality and charismatic variety) for a change of approach to canonical juridicity are lacking. The hierarchical structural and organizational aspect tends to prevail over the centrality of the person and the community. The juridical-dogmatic imprint, purified of positivistic and structuralist deviations, can form the basis for the maturation of a constitutional paradigm. \nSOMMARIO - 1. Il senso di una ricerca storica parziale e settoriale - 2. Un antesignano del sistema costituzionale? - 3. La proposta del Forchielli e il dibattito coevo - 4. L’esplicita emersione dell’esigenza costituzionale - 4.1. Il corso di Bertola - 4.2. L’indagine sulla potestà di Ragazzini - 4.3. La ‘Summa juris constitutionalis Ecclesiae’ del Ferrante - 5. Il contesto stimolante della dottrina laica italiana e la teoria sull’ordinamento canonico - 6. I limiti dell’impostazione costituzionalistica anteriore al Vaticano II - 7. Il legato di un approccio culturale originale. \n \n \n \n \n \n","PeriodicalId":516304,"journal":{"name":"Stato, Chiese e pluralismo confessionale","volume":" 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"La sensibilità costituzionalistica della canonistica italiana anteriore al Vaticano II\",\"authors\":\"Massimo del Pozzo\",\"doi\":\"10.54103/1971-8543/23310\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\nThe Constitutionalist Sensibility of Italian Canonists prior to Vatican II \\n \\n \\n \\nABSTRACT: The paper traces the main contributions of Italian canonists to canonical constitutionalism prior to Vatican II. Starting with Emmanuele de Sarzana’s textbook, it examines Giuseppe Forchielli’s proposal in the debate on the Ecclesiastical Law Archive and the approach of Bertola, Ragazzini and Ferrante’s texts. Special attention is paid to the foundations and contributions of the so-called Italian dogmatic school (Del Giudice, Giacchi, d’Avack and others). Systematic approach and dialogue with secular culture dispose to the acquisition of constitutionalist categories; however, mature and thoughtful elaborations of the modern constitutional approach are not yet found. Prior to the Second Vatican Council, the ecclesiological and conceptual premises (fundamental equality and charismatic variety) for a change of approach to canonical juridicity are lacking. The hierarchical structural and organizational aspect tends to prevail over the centrality of the person and the community. The juridical-dogmatic imprint, purified of positivistic and structuralist deviations, can form the basis for the maturation of a constitutional paradigm. \\nSOMMARIO - 1. Il senso di una ricerca storica parziale e settoriale - 2. Un antesignano del sistema costituzionale? - 3. La proposta del Forchielli e il dibattito coevo - 4. L’esplicita emersione dell’esigenza costituzionale - 4.1. Il corso di Bertola - 4.2. L’indagine sulla potestà di Ragazzini - 4.3. La ‘Summa juris constitutionalis Ecclesiae’ del Ferrante - 5. Il contesto stimolante della dottrina laica italiana e la teoria sull’ordinamento canonico - 6. I limiti dell’impostazione costituzionalistica anteriore al Vaticano II - 7. Il legato di un approccio culturale originale. \\n \\n \\n \\n \\n \\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":516304,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stato, Chiese e pluralismo confessionale\",\"volume\":\" 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stato, Chiese e pluralismo confessionale\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54103/1971-8543/23310\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stato, Chiese e pluralismo confessionale","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54103/1971-8543/23310","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
梵二会议前意大利教规学家的立宪主义情怀 ABSTRACT: 本文追溯了梵二会议前意大利教规学家对教规立宪主义的主要贡献。从 Emmanuele de Sarzana 的教科书开始,研究了 Giuseppe Forchielli 在教会法档案辩论中提出的建议以及 Bertola、Ragazzini 和 Ferrante 的文本方法。特别关注所谓的意大利教条学派(Del Giudice、Giacchi、d'Avack 等)的基础和贡献。系统的方法和与世俗文化的对话有助于获得宪政范畴;然而,尚未发现对现代宪政方法的成熟和深思熟虑的阐述。在梵蒂冈第二次大公会议之前,缺乏改变教规法学方法的教会学和概念前提(基本平等和神恩多样性)。等级森严的结构和组织方面往往优先于人和团体的中心地位。摒弃了实证主义和结构主义偏差的司法教条主义印记,可以为宪法范式的成熟奠定基础。SOMMARIO - 1. Il senso di un ricerca storica parziale e settoriale - 2. Un antesignano del sistema costituzionale?- 3.La proposta del Forchielli e il dibattito coevo - 4.L'esplicita emersione dell'esigenza costituzionale - 4.1.Il corso di Bertola - 4.2.L'indagine sulla potestà di Ragazzini - 4.3.La 'Summa juris constitutionalis Ecclesiae' del Ferrante - 5.Il contesto stimolante della dottrina laica italiana e la teoria sull'ordinamento canonico - 6.I limiti dell'impostazione costituzionalistica anteriore al Vaticano II - 7.Il legato di un approccio culturale originale.
La sensibilità costituzionalistica della canonistica italiana anteriore al Vaticano II
The Constitutionalist Sensibility of Italian Canonists prior to Vatican II
ABSTRACT: The paper traces the main contributions of Italian canonists to canonical constitutionalism prior to Vatican II. Starting with Emmanuele de Sarzana’s textbook, it examines Giuseppe Forchielli’s proposal in the debate on the Ecclesiastical Law Archive and the approach of Bertola, Ragazzini and Ferrante’s texts. Special attention is paid to the foundations and contributions of the so-called Italian dogmatic school (Del Giudice, Giacchi, d’Avack and others). Systematic approach and dialogue with secular culture dispose to the acquisition of constitutionalist categories; however, mature and thoughtful elaborations of the modern constitutional approach are not yet found. Prior to the Second Vatican Council, the ecclesiological and conceptual premises (fundamental equality and charismatic variety) for a change of approach to canonical juridicity are lacking. The hierarchical structural and organizational aspect tends to prevail over the centrality of the person and the community. The juridical-dogmatic imprint, purified of positivistic and structuralist deviations, can form the basis for the maturation of a constitutional paradigm.
SOMMARIO - 1. Il senso di una ricerca storica parziale e settoriale - 2. Un antesignano del sistema costituzionale? - 3. La proposta del Forchielli e il dibattito coevo - 4. L’esplicita emersione dell’esigenza costituzionale - 4.1. Il corso di Bertola - 4.2. L’indagine sulla potestà di Ragazzini - 4.3. La ‘Summa juris constitutionalis Ecclesiae’ del Ferrante - 5. Il contesto stimolante della dottrina laica italiana e la teoria sull’ordinamento canonico - 6. I limiti dell’impostazione costituzionalistica anteriore al Vaticano II - 7. Il legato di un approccio culturale originale.