剖腹产后强化恢复(ERAC)与传统护理:对 18,368 名受试者进行的扩大系统回顾和荟萃分析

M. Lestari, Djayanti Sari, Susilo Chandra, Purwoko Purwoko, I. Isngadi, Tungki Pratama Umar
{"title":"剖腹产后强化恢复(ERAC)与传统护理:对 18,368 名受试者进行的扩大系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"M. Lestari, Djayanti Sari, Susilo Chandra, Purwoko Purwoko, I. Isngadi, Tungki Pratama Umar","doi":"10.4103/joacp.joacp_339_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Enhanced recovery after cesarean (ERAC) is an interdisciplinary approach to improve patient outcomes following cesarean section. ERAC’s execution must be constantly evaluated. Thus, we aimed to analyze parameters associated with ERAC adoption for clinical care in this expanded systematic review.\n \n \n \n A systematic literature search using Epistemonikos, Google Scholar, PubMed, and Scopus was done until February 2023. The appropriate observational and experimental research comparing the effects of ERAC protocols with conventional care on postoperative adverse events, operation-related characteristics, time to first (oral intake, mobilization, bowel movement, and urinary catheter removal), and opioid use. Meta-analyses were conducted using the RevMan 5.4.1. and Comprehensive Meta-Analysis version 3.3 software.\n \n \n \n In total, 23 studies were included in this systematic review. ERAC implementation was found to be associated with improvement in terms of shorter postoperative hospital stays and faster time to first liquid intake, first solid diet, urinary catheter removal, and mobilization. Furthermore, the rate of opioid-free treatment, total in-hospital morphine milligram equivalent (MME), daily in-hospital MME, and total prescribed opioid pills at discharge (all parameters, P < 0.01) were significantly better in the ERAC group than in the conventional care group. However, no significant difference was observed regarding postoperative adverse events, blood loss, operation duration, and total prescribed MME at discharge parameters between the two observed groups.\n \n \n \n ERAC implementation is associated with better healthcare delivery, as determined by shorter time to first, lower opioid consumption, and shorter postoperative length of stay compared with conventional care. However, it is not associated with a lower dosage of opioid prescription at discharge.\n \n Key Message:\n ERAC has demonstrated immense advantages and appears to be the future of cesarean delivery methods worldwide. However, based on our analysis, it is not associated with a lower dosage of opioid prescription at discharge.\n","PeriodicalId":508221,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology","volume":" 35","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhanced recovery after cesarean (ERAC) versus conventional care: An expanded systematic review and meta-analysis of 18,368 subjects\",\"authors\":\"M. Lestari, Djayanti Sari, Susilo Chandra, Purwoko Purwoko, I. Isngadi, Tungki Pratama Umar\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/joacp.joacp_339_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n Enhanced recovery after cesarean (ERAC) is an interdisciplinary approach to improve patient outcomes following cesarean section. ERAC’s execution must be constantly evaluated. Thus, we aimed to analyze parameters associated with ERAC adoption for clinical care in this expanded systematic review.\\n \\n \\n \\n A systematic literature search using Epistemonikos, Google Scholar, PubMed, and Scopus was done until February 2023. The appropriate observational and experimental research comparing the effects of ERAC protocols with conventional care on postoperative adverse events, operation-related characteristics, time to first (oral intake, mobilization, bowel movement, and urinary catheter removal), and opioid use. Meta-analyses were conducted using the RevMan 5.4.1. and Comprehensive Meta-Analysis version 3.3 software.\\n \\n \\n \\n In total, 23 studies were included in this systematic review. ERAC implementation was found to be associated with improvement in terms of shorter postoperative hospital stays and faster time to first liquid intake, first solid diet, urinary catheter removal, and mobilization. Furthermore, the rate of opioid-free treatment, total in-hospital morphine milligram equivalent (MME), daily in-hospital MME, and total prescribed opioid pills at discharge (all parameters, P < 0.01) were significantly better in the ERAC group than in the conventional care group. However, no significant difference was observed regarding postoperative adverse events, blood loss, operation duration, and total prescribed MME at discharge parameters between the two observed groups.\\n \\n \\n \\n ERAC implementation is associated with better healthcare delivery, as determined by shorter time to first, lower opioid consumption, and shorter postoperative length of stay compared with conventional care. However, it is not associated with a lower dosage of opioid prescription at discharge.\\n \\n Key Message:\\n ERAC has demonstrated immense advantages and appears to be the future of cesarean delivery methods worldwide. However, based on our analysis, it is not associated with a lower dosage of opioid prescription at discharge.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":508221,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\" 35\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_339_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_339_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

加强剖宫产术后恢复(ERAC)是一种跨学科方法,旨在改善剖宫产术后患者的治疗效果。必须不断评估 ERAC 的执行情况。因此,我们旨在通过本扩展系统综述分析与采用ERAC进行临床护理相关的参数。 我们使用 Epistemonikos、Google Scholar、PubMed 和 Scopus 对文献进行了系统检索,直至 2023 年 2 月。适当的观察性和实验性研究比较了 ERAC 方案与传统护理在术后不良事件、手术相关特征、首次(口服、移动、排便和拔除导尿管)时间和阿片类药物使用方面的效果。元分析使用 RevMan 5.4.1 和 Comprehensive Meta-Analysis 3.3 版软件进行。 本系统综述共纳入 23 项研究。研究发现,实施ERAC可缩短术后住院时间,加快首次进食流质食物、首次进食固体食物、拔除导尿管和下床活动的时间。此外,ERAC组的无阿片类药物治疗率、院内吗啡毫克当量总量、每日院内吗啡毫克当量总量和出院时阿片类药物处方总量(所有参数,P<0.01)均显著优于常规护理组。然而,在术后不良事件、失血量、手术持续时间和出院时处方的阿片类药物总量等参数方面,两组之间没有观察到明显差异。 与传统护理相比,ERAC 的实施与更好的医疗服务相关,这体现在更短的首次手术时间、更低的阿片类药物用量以及更短的术后住院时间。然而,这与出院时阿片类药物处方剂量更低无关。 关键信息:ERAC 显示了巨大的优势,似乎是全球剖宫产方法的未来。然而,根据我们的分析,ERAC 与降低出院时阿片类药物处方剂量无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Enhanced recovery after cesarean (ERAC) versus conventional care: An expanded systematic review and meta-analysis of 18,368 subjects
Enhanced recovery after cesarean (ERAC) is an interdisciplinary approach to improve patient outcomes following cesarean section. ERAC’s execution must be constantly evaluated. Thus, we aimed to analyze parameters associated with ERAC adoption for clinical care in this expanded systematic review. A systematic literature search using Epistemonikos, Google Scholar, PubMed, and Scopus was done until February 2023. The appropriate observational and experimental research comparing the effects of ERAC protocols with conventional care on postoperative adverse events, operation-related characteristics, time to first (oral intake, mobilization, bowel movement, and urinary catheter removal), and opioid use. Meta-analyses were conducted using the RevMan 5.4.1. and Comprehensive Meta-Analysis version 3.3 software. In total, 23 studies were included in this systematic review. ERAC implementation was found to be associated with improvement in terms of shorter postoperative hospital stays and faster time to first liquid intake, first solid diet, urinary catheter removal, and mobilization. Furthermore, the rate of opioid-free treatment, total in-hospital morphine milligram equivalent (MME), daily in-hospital MME, and total prescribed opioid pills at discharge (all parameters, P < 0.01) were significantly better in the ERAC group than in the conventional care group. However, no significant difference was observed regarding postoperative adverse events, blood loss, operation duration, and total prescribed MME at discharge parameters between the two observed groups. ERAC implementation is associated with better healthcare delivery, as determined by shorter time to first, lower opioid consumption, and shorter postoperative length of stay compared with conventional care. However, it is not associated with a lower dosage of opioid prescription at discharge. Key Message: ERAC has demonstrated immense advantages and appears to be the future of cesarean delivery methods worldwide. However, based on our analysis, it is not associated with a lower dosage of opioid prescription at discharge.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided retrolaminar block in truncal surgeries: A narrative review Anesthetic challenges in using posterior retroperitoneoscopic approach for phaeochromocytoma in pregnancy A case of lost endotracheal tube PONV, beyond “Apfel” score Clinical experience with stellate ganglion block in a neonate
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1