护理革命:释放老年病综合评估的力量,为重症监护后的虚弱患者量身定制治疗方案

João Gabriel Rosa Ramos, Michele Melo Bautista, Rafael Calazans, Luciulo Melo, Cassiano Teixeira
{"title":"护理革命:释放老年病综合评估的力量,为重症监护后的虚弱患者量身定制治疗方案","authors":"João Gabriel Rosa Ramos, Michele Melo Bautista, Rafael Calazans, Luciulo Melo, Cassiano Teixeira","doi":"10.62675/2965-2774.20240023-en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Frailty represents a condition of vulnerability leading to inadequate recovery following a stressful event, such as an acute illness or injury. This inadequate recovery results from cumulative, multisystem physiological depletion over a lifetime. (1) The frailty state implies that the available functional reserve is insufficient for complete recovery, often leading to a maladaptive response disproportionate to the degree of insult. (2) Frailty syndrome comprises five core components: vulnerability to stressors, multifactorial etiology causing multisystem dysregulation, heterogeneous presentation, clinical measurability, and association with adverse outcomes. (3) These components underscore frailty as a treatable clinical syndrome with a measurable biological basis. (2) Importantly, frailty is separate from but related to older age, multimorbidity or disability. For example, up to 4% of adults less than 65 years of age are frail, and up to 38% are prefrail, with an increasing prevalence in multimorbid patients. (4) Additionally, even though disability and comorbidities overlap with frailty, 8.6% of frail patients have no disabilities or comorbidities. (5) Thus, while conventionally linked to older age and health issues, frailty is now recognized as a dynamic transitional state from robustness to functional decline, potentially preventable or reversible in some cases. (2) The trajectory of critical illness closely aligns with the frailty process. Critical illness affects patients’ functional trajectory, with a substantial proportion of patients facing death or functional decline within a year after intensive care unit (ICU","PeriodicalId":72721,"journal":{"name":"Critical care science","volume":"75 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revolutionizing care: unleashing the power of comprehensive geriatric assessment in tailoring treatment for frail postintensive care patients\",\"authors\":\"João Gabriel Rosa Ramos, Michele Melo Bautista, Rafael Calazans, Luciulo Melo, Cassiano Teixeira\",\"doi\":\"10.62675/2965-2774.20240023-en\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Frailty represents a condition of vulnerability leading to inadequate recovery following a stressful event, such as an acute illness or injury. This inadequate recovery results from cumulative, multisystem physiological depletion over a lifetime. (1) The frailty state implies that the available functional reserve is insufficient for complete recovery, often leading to a maladaptive response disproportionate to the degree of insult. (2) Frailty syndrome comprises five core components: vulnerability to stressors, multifactorial etiology causing multisystem dysregulation, heterogeneous presentation, clinical measurability, and association with adverse outcomes. (3) These components underscore frailty as a treatable clinical syndrome with a measurable biological basis. (2) Importantly, frailty is separate from but related to older age, multimorbidity or disability. For example, up to 4% of adults less than 65 years of age are frail, and up to 38% are prefrail, with an increasing prevalence in multimorbid patients. (4) Additionally, even though disability and comorbidities overlap with frailty, 8.6% of frail patients have no disabilities or comorbidities. (5) Thus, while conventionally linked to older age and health issues, frailty is now recognized as a dynamic transitional state from robustness to functional decline, potentially preventable or reversible in some cases. (2) The trajectory of critical illness closely aligns with the frailty process. Critical illness affects patients’ functional trajectory, with a substantial proportion of patients facing death or functional decline within a year after intensive care unit (ICU\",\"PeriodicalId\":72721,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical care science\",\"volume\":\"75 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical care science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.62675/2965-2774.20240023-en\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62675/2965-2774.20240023-en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虚弱是一种脆弱的状态,导致在急性疾病或受伤等应激事件后恢复不足。这种恢复不足是一生中累积的多系统生理消耗造成的。(1) 衰弱状态意味着可用的功能储备不足以完全恢复,往往会导致与损伤程度不相称的不适应反应。(2)虚弱综合征由五个核心部分组成:易受压力因素影响、多因素病因导致多系统失调、表现异质性、临床可测性以及与不良后果相关。(3)这些要素强调了虚弱是一种可治疗的临床综合征,具有可测量的生物学基础。(2) 重要的是,虚弱与年老、多病或残疾是分开的,但又是相关的。例如,在 65 岁以下的成年人中,多达 4% 的人体弱,多达 38% 的人体弱前期,在多病病人中的发病率越来越高。(4)此外,尽管残疾和合并症与体弱重叠,但 8.6% 的体弱患者没有残疾或合并症。(5)因此,虽然虚弱通常与老年和健康问题相关,但现在人们已认识到它是一种从健康到功能衰退的动态过渡状态,在某些情况下是可以预防或逆转的。(2) 危重病的发展轨迹与虚弱过程密切相关。危重病会影响患者的功能轨迹,相当一部分患者在重症监护室(ICU)治疗后一年内就会面临死亡或功能衰退。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Revolutionizing care: unleashing the power of comprehensive geriatric assessment in tailoring treatment for frail postintensive care patients
Frailty represents a condition of vulnerability leading to inadequate recovery following a stressful event, such as an acute illness or injury. This inadequate recovery results from cumulative, multisystem physiological depletion over a lifetime. (1) The frailty state implies that the available functional reserve is insufficient for complete recovery, often leading to a maladaptive response disproportionate to the degree of insult. (2) Frailty syndrome comprises five core components: vulnerability to stressors, multifactorial etiology causing multisystem dysregulation, heterogeneous presentation, clinical measurability, and association with adverse outcomes. (3) These components underscore frailty as a treatable clinical syndrome with a measurable biological basis. (2) Importantly, frailty is separate from but related to older age, multimorbidity or disability. For example, up to 4% of adults less than 65 years of age are frail, and up to 38% are prefrail, with an increasing prevalence in multimorbid patients. (4) Additionally, even though disability and comorbidities overlap with frailty, 8.6% of frail patients have no disabilities or comorbidities. (5) Thus, while conventionally linked to older age and health issues, frailty is now recognized as a dynamic transitional state from robustness to functional decline, potentially preventable or reversible in some cases. (2) The trajectory of critical illness closely aligns with the frailty process. Critical illness affects patients’ functional trajectory, with a substantial proportion of patients facing death or functional decline within a year after intensive care unit (ICU
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analyzing how the components of the SOFA score change over time in their contribution to mortality. To: Clinical outcomes of intensive care unit-acquired weakness in critically ill COVID-19 patients. A prospective cohort study. Challenges in using the dynamic components of the SOFA score in health care databases. Impact of intensive care unit admission on cancer patients: enhancing long-term survival through better understanding. Rate of non-metastatic solid tumor progression following critical illness: a prospective cohort study of UK Biobank participants.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1