作为非自由政治的边界制造

IF 1.7 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Journal of Language and Politics Pub Date : 2024-05-07 DOI:10.1075/jlp.23089.sco
J. W. Scott
{"title":"作为非自由政治的边界制造","authors":"J. W. Scott","doi":"10.1075/jlp.23089.sco","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Radical Right-wing populism frequently involves ‘divide and rule’ strategies as a means to attain and consolidate\n political power. In the cases of Viktor Orban’s political regime in Hungary and Donald Trump’s four-year presidency (and its\n aftermath), we find a pronounced attempt to create narrative hegemony of a sense of nation built upon Christian civilization and\n foundationalist understandings of national identity. Moreover, both cases reveal processes of social border-making that are\n reflected in norming and the creation of distinctions based on degrees of national authenticity. Applying an ontological security\n and critical borders studies approach, this paper will specifically focus on the different ways in which border-making processes,\n or bordering, are implicated in the exercise of illiberal political power in the Hungarian and US cases. Despite many\n similarities, the actual mobilization of popular support reflects local conditions and has resulted in rather different political\n outcomes.","PeriodicalId":51676,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Language and Politics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Border-making as illiberal politics\",\"authors\":\"J. W. Scott\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/jlp.23089.sco\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Radical Right-wing populism frequently involves ‘divide and rule’ strategies as a means to attain and consolidate\\n political power. In the cases of Viktor Orban’s political regime in Hungary and Donald Trump’s four-year presidency (and its\\n aftermath), we find a pronounced attempt to create narrative hegemony of a sense of nation built upon Christian civilization and\\n foundationalist understandings of national identity. Moreover, both cases reveal processes of social border-making that are\\n reflected in norming and the creation of distinctions based on degrees of national authenticity. Applying an ontological security\\n and critical borders studies approach, this paper will specifically focus on the different ways in which border-making processes,\\n or bordering, are implicated in the exercise of illiberal political power in the Hungarian and US cases. Despite many\\n similarities, the actual mobilization of popular support reflects local conditions and has resulted in rather different political\\n outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51676,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Language and Politics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Language and Politics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.23089.sco\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Language and Politics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.23089.sco","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

激进的右翼民粹主义经常采取 "分而治之 "的策略,以此作为获得和巩固政治权力的手段。在维克多-欧尔班(Viktor Orban)的匈牙利政权和唐纳德-特朗普(Donald Trump)的四年总统任期(及其后)中,我们发现了一种明显的企图,即建立在基督教文明和对国家认同的基础主义理解之上的国家意识的叙事霸权。此外,这两个案例都揭示了社会边界的形成过程,这种过程反映在规范化和基于国家真实性程度的区分上。本文将运用本体论安全和批判性边界研究的方法,特别关注匈牙利和美国案例中边界形成过程或边界与行使非自由政治权力的不同牵连方式。尽管有许多相似之处,但实际动员民众支持的情况反映了当地的条件,并导致了相当不同的政治结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Border-making as illiberal politics
Radical Right-wing populism frequently involves ‘divide and rule’ strategies as a means to attain and consolidate political power. In the cases of Viktor Orban’s political regime in Hungary and Donald Trump’s four-year presidency (and its aftermath), we find a pronounced attempt to create narrative hegemony of a sense of nation built upon Christian civilization and foundationalist understandings of national identity. Moreover, both cases reveal processes of social border-making that are reflected in norming and the creation of distinctions based on degrees of national authenticity. Applying an ontological security and critical borders studies approach, this paper will specifically focus on the different ways in which border-making processes, or bordering, are implicated in the exercise of illiberal political power in the Hungarian and US cases. Despite many similarities, the actual mobilization of popular support reflects local conditions and has resulted in rather different political outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
50
期刊最新文献
Shaping gender policies at the COPs Demarcating rights in divided social worlds Claims of ownership, claims of dignity Reverberations Discourse and transformation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1