{"title":"作为非自由政治的边界制造","authors":"J. W. Scott","doi":"10.1075/jlp.23089.sco","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Radical Right-wing populism frequently involves ‘divide and rule’ strategies as a means to attain and consolidate\n political power. In the cases of Viktor Orban’s political regime in Hungary and Donald Trump’s four-year presidency (and its\n aftermath), we find a pronounced attempt to create narrative hegemony of a sense of nation built upon Christian civilization and\n foundationalist understandings of national identity. Moreover, both cases reveal processes of social border-making that are\n reflected in norming and the creation of distinctions based on degrees of national authenticity. Applying an ontological security\n and critical borders studies approach, this paper will specifically focus on the different ways in which border-making processes,\n or bordering, are implicated in the exercise of illiberal political power in the Hungarian and US cases. Despite many\n similarities, the actual mobilization of popular support reflects local conditions and has resulted in rather different political\n outcomes.","PeriodicalId":51676,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Language and Politics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Border-making as illiberal politics\",\"authors\":\"J. W. Scott\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/jlp.23089.sco\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Radical Right-wing populism frequently involves ‘divide and rule’ strategies as a means to attain and consolidate\\n political power. In the cases of Viktor Orban’s political regime in Hungary and Donald Trump’s four-year presidency (and its\\n aftermath), we find a pronounced attempt to create narrative hegemony of a sense of nation built upon Christian civilization and\\n foundationalist understandings of national identity. Moreover, both cases reveal processes of social border-making that are\\n reflected in norming and the creation of distinctions based on degrees of national authenticity. Applying an ontological security\\n and critical borders studies approach, this paper will specifically focus on the different ways in which border-making processes,\\n or bordering, are implicated in the exercise of illiberal political power in the Hungarian and US cases. Despite many\\n similarities, the actual mobilization of popular support reflects local conditions and has resulted in rather different political\\n outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51676,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Language and Politics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Language and Politics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.23089.sco\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Language and Politics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.23089.sco","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Radical Right-wing populism frequently involves ‘divide and rule’ strategies as a means to attain and consolidate
political power. In the cases of Viktor Orban’s political regime in Hungary and Donald Trump’s four-year presidency (and its
aftermath), we find a pronounced attempt to create narrative hegemony of a sense of nation built upon Christian civilization and
foundationalist understandings of national identity. Moreover, both cases reveal processes of social border-making that are
reflected in norming and the creation of distinctions based on degrees of national authenticity. Applying an ontological security
and critical borders studies approach, this paper will specifically focus on the different ways in which border-making processes,
or bordering, are implicated in the exercise of illiberal political power in the Hungarian and US cases. Despite many
similarities, the actual mobilization of popular support reflects local conditions and has resulted in rather different political
outcomes.