风险规避挤出的异质性:评估《美国医疗补助法案》(ACA)医疗补助扩展的效果

IF 1.1 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE Risk Management and Insurance Review Pub Date : 2024-05-06 DOI:10.1111/rmir.12267
Sezen O. Onal
{"title":"风险规避挤出的异质性:评估《美国医疗补助法案》(ACA)医疗补助扩展的效果","authors":"Sezen O. Onal","doi":"10.1111/rmir.12267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, I estimate the heterogeneity in the crowd‐out of private health insurance by risk aversion with the Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act. Using data from the Health and Retirement Study, I find that the Medicaid expansion led to a decrease in private coverage among risk‐loving individuals by 5 percentage points. However, the expansion did not lead to any meaningful change in private coverage for risk‐averse individuals. This finding suggests that risk‐averse individuals are willing to keep their private coverage, even though they become eligible for Medicaid. This potentially signals a sorting effect into private insurance. Under the assumption that highly risk‐averse individuals typically display superior health conditions, this preferential behavior could signify a form of advantageous selection into private insurance. Furthermore, the expansion increased Medicaid coverage by 3.4 percentage points for risk‐loving individuals, while not causing any discernible change in coverage among risk‐averse individuals. Such differential responses could potentially influence the risk composition of Medicaid coverage, and subsequently impact the cumulative expenditure associated with it.","PeriodicalId":35338,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Insurance Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Heterogeneity in crowd‐out by risk aversion: Assessing the effect of the ACA Medicaid expansion\",\"authors\":\"Sezen O. Onal\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/rmir.12267\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this study, I estimate the heterogeneity in the crowd‐out of private health insurance by risk aversion with the Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act. Using data from the Health and Retirement Study, I find that the Medicaid expansion led to a decrease in private coverage among risk‐loving individuals by 5 percentage points. However, the expansion did not lead to any meaningful change in private coverage for risk‐averse individuals. This finding suggests that risk‐averse individuals are willing to keep their private coverage, even though they become eligible for Medicaid. This potentially signals a sorting effect into private insurance. Under the assumption that highly risk‐averse individuals typically display superior health conditions, this preferential behavior could signify a form of advantageous selection into private insurance. Furthermore, the expansion increased Medicaid coverage by 3.4 percentage points for risk‐loving individuals, while not causing any discernible change in coverage among risk‐averse individuals. Such differential responses could potentially influence the risk composition of Medicaid coverage, and subsequently impact the cumulative expenditure associated with it.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35338,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Risk Management and Insurance Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Risk Management and Insurance Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/rmir.12267\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Insurance Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/rmir.12267","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本研究中,我估算了《平价医疗法案》扩大医疗补助计划后,风险规避对私人医疗保险挤出的异质性。利用《健康与退休研究》(Health and Retirement Study)的数据,我发现《医疗补助计划》(Medicaid)的扩大导致风险偏好者的私人保险减少了 5 个百分点。然而,对于规避风险的个人来说,医疗补助的扩大并没有导致私人保险发生任何有意义的变化。这一发现表明,规避风险的个人愿意保留他们的私人保险,即使他们有资格获得《医疗补助计划》。这可能预示着私人保险的分类效应。根据高风险规避者通常表现出优越的健康状况这一假设,这种偏好行为可能意味着对私人保险的一种有利选择。此外,医疗补助计划的扩大使风险偏好者的覆盖率提高了 3.4 个百分点,而风险规避者的覆盖率却没有明显变化。这种不同的反应可能会影响《医疗补助计划》的风险构成,进而影响与之相关的累计支出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Heterogeneity in crowd‐out by risk aversion: Assessing the effect of the ACA Medicaid expansion
In this study, I estimate the heterogeneity in the crowd‐out of private health insurance by risk aversion with the Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act. Using data from the Health and Retirement Study, I find that the Medicaid expansion led to a decrease in private coverage among risk‐loving individuals by 5 percentage points. However, the expansion did not lead to any meaningful change in private coverage for risk‐averse individuals. This finding suggests that risk‐averse individuals are willing to keep their private coverage, even though they become eligible for Medicaid. This potentially signals a sorting effect into private insurance. Under the assumption that highly risk‐averse individuals typically display superior health conditions, this preferential behavior could signify a form of advantageous selection into private insurance. Furthermore, the expansion increased Medicaid coverage by 3.4 percentage points for risk‐loving individuals, while not causing any discernible change in coverage among risk‐averse individuals. Such differential responses could potentially influence the risk composition of Medicaid coverage, and subsequently impact the cumulative expenditure associated with it.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Risk Management and Insurance Review
Risk Management and Insurance Review Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Finance
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Risk Management and Insurance Review publishes respected, accessible, and high-quality applied research, and well-reasoned opinion and discussion in the field of risk and insurance. The Review"s "Feature Articles" section includes original research involving applications and applied techniques. The "Perspectives" section contains articles providing new insights on the research literature, business practice, and public policy. The "Educational Insights" section provides a repository of high-caliber model lectures in risk and insurance, along with articles discussing and evaluating instructional techniques.
期刊最新文献
Determinants and value of corporate social responsibility management: Empirical evidence from the insurance industry Unaffordable, untrustworthy, or unnecessary? Reasons for foregoing building, home contents, and comprehensive car insurance in disaster‐prone Australia The impact of brokers on ACA marketplace growth Introduction: The ACA marketplace experience Medical care services interplay between individual and Medicaid managed care markets in expansion versus non‐expansion states
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1