评估阿哌沙班在心房颤动和需要透析的终末期肾病患者中应用情况的 Meta 分析

IF 2.2 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Arrhythmia Pub Date : 2024-05-06 DOI:10.1002/joa3.13051
Ahmed AlTurki MD, Mariam Marafi MD, Ahmed Dawas MD, Jacqueline Joza MD, Riccardo Proietti MD, PhD, Vincenzo Russo MD, PhD, Thomas Mavrakanas MD, Emilie Trinh MD, MSc, Catherine Weber MD, Rita Suri MD, Vidal Essebag MD, PhD, Thao Huynh MD, PhD
{"title":"评估阿哌沙班在心房颤动和需要透析的终末期肾病患者中应用情况的 Meta 分析","authors":"Ahmed AlTurki MD,&nbsp;Mariam Marafi MD,&nbsp;Ahmed Dawas MD,&nbsp;Jacqueline Joza MD,&nbsp;Riccardo Proietti MD, PhD,&nbsp;Vincenzo Russo MD, PhD,&nbsp;Thomas Mavrakanas MD,&nbsp;Emilie Trinh MD, MSc,&nbsp;Catherine Weber MD,&nbsp;Rita Suri MD,&nbsp;Vidal Essebag MD, PhD,&nbsp;Thao Huynh MD, PhD","doi":"10.1002/joa3.13051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Warfarin is considered the primary oral anticoagulant for patients with atrial fibrillation and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring dialysis. Although warfarin can offer significant stroke prevention in this population, the accompanying major bleeding risks make warfarin nearly prohibitive. Apixaban was shown to be superior to warfarin in preventing stroke or systemic embolism, with a lower risk of bleeding and mortality in a large, randomized trial of individuals with mostly normal renal function but none with ESRD.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We systematically reviewed evidence comparing apixaban versus warfarin for atrial fibrillation in this population, and evaluated outcomes of stroke or systemic embolism, and major bleeding using random-effects models. The main safety outcome was major bleeding, and the main effectiveness outcome was stroke or systemic embolism.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We found five observational studies of 10 036 patients (2638 receiving apixaban, and 7398 receiving warfarin) meeting inclusion criteria. Pooled analysis demonstrated a significant reduction in major bleeding with apixaban as compared to warfarin (odds ratio [OR] 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.42–0.61; <i>p</i> &lt; .0001). Apixaban was also associated with a reduction in intracranial bleeding (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.37–0.92; <i>p</i> = .02) and in gastrointestinal bleeding (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.51–0.73; <i>p</i> &lt; .0001). Furthermore, apixaban was associated with a reduction in stroke/systemic embolism (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.50–0.82; <i>p</i> &lt; .0001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Apixaban was associated with superior outcomes and reduced adverse events compared to warfarin in observational studies of patients with atrial fibrillation on dialysis. Randomized controlled studies are needed to confirm these findings.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15174,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arrhythmia","volume":"40 3","pages":"440-447"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/joa3.13051","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Meta-analysis evaluating apixaban in patients with atrial fibrillation and end-stage renal disease requiring dialysis\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed AlTurki MD,&nbsp;Mariam Marafi MD,&nbsp;Ahmed Dawas MD,&nbsp;Jacqueline Joza MD,&nbsp;Riccardo Proietti MD, PhD,&nbsp;Vincenzo Russo MD, PhD,&nbsp;Thomas Mavrakanas MD,&nbsp;Emilie Trinh MD, MSc,&nbsp;Catherine Weber MD,&nbsp;Rita Suri MD,&nbsp;Vidal Essebag MD, PhD,&nbsp;Thao Huynh MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/joa3.13051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Warfarin is considered the primary oral anticoagulant for patients with atrial fibrillation and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring dialysis. Although warfarin can offer significant stroke prevention in this population, the accompanying major bleeding risks make warfarin nearly prohibitive. Apixaban was shown to be superior to warfarin in preventing stroke or systemic embolism, with a lower risk of bleeding and mortality in a large, randomized trial of individuals with mostly normal renal function but none with ESRD.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We systematically reviewed evidence comparing apixaban versus warfarin for atrial fibrillation in this population, and evaluated outcomes of stroke or systemic embolism, and major bleeding using random-effects models. The main safety outcome was major bleeding, and the main effectiveness outcome was stroke or systemic embolism.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>We found five observational studies of 10 036 patients (2638 receiving apixaban, and 7398 receiving warfarin) meeting inclusion criteria. Pooled analysis demonstrated a significant reduction in major bleeding with apixaban as compared to warfarin (odds ratio [OR] 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.42–0.61; <i>p</i> &lt; .0001). Apixaban was also associated with a reduction in intracranial bleeding (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.37–0.92; <i>p</i> = .02) and in gastrointestinal bleeding (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.51–0.73; <i>p</i> &lt; .0001). Furthermore, apixaban was associated with a reduction in stroke/systemic embolism (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.50–0.82; <i>p</i> &lt; .0001).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Apixaban was associated with superior outcomes and reduced adverse events compared to warfarin in observational studies of patients with atrial fibrillation on dialysis. Randomized controlled studies are needed to confirm these findings.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Arrhythmia\",\"volume\":\"40 3\",\"pages\":\"440-447\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/joa3.13051\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Arrhythmia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joa3.13051\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arrhythmia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joa3.13051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

华法林被认为是心房颤动和需要透析的终末期肾病 (ESRD) 患者的主要口服抗凝药。虽然华法林可以有效预防这类人群的中风,但伴随而来的大出血风险让华法林几乎望而却步。阿哌沙班在预防中风或全身性栓塞方面优于华法林,而且出血风险和死亡率较低。我们系统地回顾了阿哌沙班与华法林治疗该人群心房颤动的比较证据,并使用随机效应模型评估了中风或全身性栓塞以及大出血的结局。我们发现有五项观察性研究的 10 036 名患者(2638 人接受阿哌沙班治疗,7398 人接受华法林治疗)符合纳入标准。汇总分析表明,与华法林相比,阿哌沙班可显著减少大出血(几率比 [OR] 0.51,95% 置信区间 [CI] 0.42-0.61; p < .0001)。阿哌沙班还可减少颅内出血(OR 0.58,95% CI 0.37-0.92;P = .02)和胃肠道出血(OR 0.61,95% CI 0.51-0.73;P < .0001)。此外,阿哌沙班还能减少中风/系统性栓塞(OR 0.64,95% CI 0.50-0.82;p < .0001)。在对透析中的心房颤动患者进行的观察性研究中,阿哌沙班的疗效优于华法林,不良反应也少于华法林。需要进行随机对照研究来证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Meta-analysis evaluating apixaban in patients with atrial fibrillation and end-stage renal disease requiring dialysis

Background

Warfarin is considered the primary oral anticoagulant for patients with atrial fibrillation and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring dialysis. Although warfarin can offer significant stroke prevention in this population, the accompanying major bleeding risks make warfarin nearly prohibitive. Apixaban was shown to be superior to warfarin in preventing stroke or systemic embolism, with a lower risk of bleeding and mortality in a large, randomized trial of individuals with mostly normal renal function but none with ESRD.

Methods

We systematically reviewed evidence comparing apixaban versus warfarin for atrial fibrillation in this population, and evaluated outcomes of stroke or systemic embolism, and major bleeding using random-effects models. The main safety outcome was major bleeding, and the main effectiveness outcome was stroke or systemic embolism.

Results

We found five observational studies of 10 036 patients (2638 receiving apixaban, and 7398 receiving warfarin) meeting inclusion criteria. Pooled analysis demonstrated a significant reduction in major bleeding with apixaban as compared to warfarin (odds ratio [OR] 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.42–0.61; p < .0001). Apixaban was also associated with a reduction in intracranial bleeding (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.37–0.92; p = .02) and in gastrointestinal bleeding (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.51–0.73; p < .0001). Furthermore, apixaban was associated with a reduction in stroke/systemic embolism (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.50–0.82; p < .0001).

Conclusion

Apixaban was associated with superior outcomes and reduced adverse events compared to warfarin in observational studies of patients with atrial fibrillation on dialysis. Randomized controlled studies are needed to confirm these findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Arrhythmia
Journal of Arrhythmia CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
127
审稿时长
45 weeks
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Dementia risk reduction between DOACs and VKAs in AF: A systematic review and meta-analysis Electro-anatomically confirmed sites of origin of ventricular tachycardia and premature ventricular contractions and occurrence of R wave in lead aVR: A proof of concept study The Japanese Catheter Ablation Registry (J-AB): Annual report in 2022 Slow left atrial conduction velocity in the anterior wall calculated by electroanatomic mapping predicts atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation—Systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1