妊娠糖尿病的一步式诊断测试与两步式诊断测试

Sukriti Gupta, Shashi Bala Arya, Rashmi Ramanuj, ‡. Prasad, JK Goel TARIQ MAHMOOD, Dr Shashi Bala
{"title":"妊娠糖尿病的一步式诊断测试与两步式诊断测试","authors":"Sukriti Gupta, Shashi Bala Arya, Rashmi Ramanuj, ‡. Prasad, JK Goel TARIQ MAHMOOD, Dr Shashi Bala","doi":"10.59793/ijcp.v24i4.966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Comparison between one-step Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group India (DIPSI) andAmerican Diabetes Association (ADA) recommended two-step oral glucose tolerance test(OGTT). Material and methods: This study has a sample size of 200; 100 participants eachwere subjected to either of the two tests. Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and non-GDMdiagnosed by one-step test versus two-step test, respectively, were compared to one anotherand results were compared on the basis of various antenatal complications and fetomaternaloutcomes. Results: No statistical difference was found between both the groups on the basis ofvarious antenatal and fetomaternal outcomes. Conclusion: In Indian subcontinent with poorresources and lack of follow-up, single-step DIPSI can be preferred to ADA recommendedtwo-step OGTT; however, large database studies are still required.","PeriodicalId":506647,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal Of Clinical Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"One-Step versus Two-Step Diagnostic Test for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus\",\"authors\":\"Sukriti Gupta, Shashi Bala Arya, Rashmi Ramanuj, ‡. Prasad, JK Goel TARIQ MAHMOOD, Dr Shashi Bala\",\"doi\":\"10.59793/ijcp.v24i4.966\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Comparison between one-step Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group India (DIPSI) andAmerican Diabetes Association (ADA) recommended two-step oral glucose tolerance test(OGTT). Material and methods: This study has a sample size of 200; 100 participants eachwere subjected to either of the two tests. Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and non-GDMdiagnosed by one-step test versus two-step test, respectively, were compared to one anotherand results were compared on the basis of various antenatal complications and fetomaternaloutcomes. Results: No statistical difference was found between both the groups on the basis ofvarious antenatal and fetomaternal outcomes. Conclusion: In Indian subcontinent with poorresources and lack of follow-up, single-step DIPSI can be preferred to ADA recommendedtwo-step OGTT; however, large database studies are still required.\",\"PeriodicalId\":506647,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal Of Clinical Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal Of Clinical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.59793/ijcp.v24i4.966\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal Of Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59793/ijcp.v24i4.966","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一步式印度妊娠糖尿病研究小组(DIPSI)与美国糖尿病协会(ADA)推荐的两步式口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)的比较。材料和方法:本研究的样本量为 200 人,其中 100 人接受了两种测试中的任何一种。将分别通过一步法测试和两步法测试诊断出的妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)和非GDM进行比较,并根据各种产前并发症和胎儿-产妇结局对结果进行比较。结果显示两组在各种产前并发症和胎儿结局方面均无统计学差异。结论在资源贫乏和缺乏随访的印度次大陆,单步 DIPSI 可优于 ADA 推荐的两步 OGTT;然而,仍需进行大型数据库研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
One-Step versus Two-Step Diagnostic Test for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus
Comparison between one-step Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group India (DIPSI) andAmerican Diabetes Association (ADA) recommended two-step oral glucose tolerance test(OGTT). Material and methods: This study has a sample size of 200; 100 participants eachwere subjected to either of the two tests. Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and non-GDMdiagnosed by one-step test versus two-step test, respectively, were compared to one anotherand results were compared on the basis of various antenatal complications and fetomaternaloutcomes. Results: No statistical difference was found between both the groups on the basis ofvarious antenatal and fetomaternal outcomes. Conclusion: In Indian subcontinent with poorresources and lack of follow-up, single-step DIPSI can be preferred to ADA recommendedtwo-step OGTT; however, large database studies are still required.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Medication Reconciliation Is It Structural or Metabolic? A Diagnostic Dilemma One-Step versus Two-Step Diagnostic Test for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Hydroxychloroquine - An Antimalarial and Anti-inflammatory Drug Study of Thyroid Function Tests in Patients with Metabolic Syndrome
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1