评估前列腺癌患者千伏机载成像与锥形束计算机断层扫描之间的偏移耦合参数

Tanaporn Guawgumnerdtong, N. Damrongkijudom, Achawee Suwannarat, Piyawan Chailapakul, Tawatchai Ekjeen
{"title":"评估前列腺癌患者千伏机载成像与锥形束计算机断层扫描之间的偏移耦合参数","authors":"Tanaporn Guawgumnerdtong, N. Damrongkijudom, Achawee Suwannarat, Piyawan Chailapakul, Tawatchai Ekjeen","doi":"10.12982/jams.2024.036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: External Beam Radiation Therapy (EBRT) is a curative therapy technique for prostate cancer. Since the prostate is unstable and surrounded by the bladder and rectum, precision of the target location is critical. Image Guided Radiation Therapy (IGRT) can improve treatment precision. The bladder and rectum may alter volume during IGRT, shifting the prostate’s position and resulting in missed target volume doses and extra organs at risk (OARs) doses. Objective: To assess setup error and residual error during patient positioning, as well as the current IGRT protocol efficiency, in prostate cancer patients while recommending a planning target volume (PTV) margin. Materials and methods: The offset couch parameter of on-board imaging (OBI) and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) was computed to determine the error distribution, magnitude, and error difference between treatment phases. The systematic and random errors were calculated using the van Herk equation to determine the planning target volume (PTV) margin. Results: The setup error was -0.86 to 0.25 mm, and the residual error was -0.15 to 0.32 mm. The couch displacement percentage for OBI was 29.44% to 58.89%, and for CBCT was 8.10% to 34.12%. The systematic error was 1.65 to 3.21. The random error was 1.78 to 3.29. The setup error was greatest in the longitudinal (Lng) direction, residual error was greatest in the vertical (Vrt) direction, and systematic and random error were greatest in the Vrt and lateral (Lat) direction, respectively. The PTV margin was greatest in the Vrt direction, while the Lng direction was the narrowest margin for every treatment phase. Conclusion: The highest setup error occurs in the Lng direction for all treatment phases. For the 46 Gy and 60 Gy phases, the highest residual error is in the Vrt direction. However, in the 78 Gy phase, the error is relatively close to 0.01mm in every direction. The current IGRT protocol is effective in detecting setup and residual errors. The 78 Gy phase has the greatest PTV margin, whereas the 46 Gy phase shows the narrowest margins in all directions.","PeriodicalId":298884,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Associated Medical Sciences","volume":"54 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the offset couch parameter between kilovoltage on-board imaging and cone-beam computed tomography in patients with prostate cancer\",\"authors\":\"Tanaporn Guawgumnerdtong, N. Damrongkijudom, Achawee Suwannarat, Piyawan Chailapakul, Tawatchai Ekjeen\",\"doi\":\"10.12982/jams.2024.036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: External Beam Radiation Therapy (EBRT) is a curative therapy technique for prostate cancer. Since the prostate is unstable and surrounded by the bladder and rectum, precision of the target location is critical. Image Guided Radiation Therapy (IGRT) can improve treatment precision. The bladder and rectum may alter volume during IGRT, shifting the prostate’s position and resulting in missed target volume doses and extra organs at risk (OARs) doses. Objective: To assess setup error and residual error during patient positioning, as well as the current IGRT protocol efficiency, in prostate cancer patients while recommending a planning target volume (PTV) margin. Materials and methods: The offset couch parameter of on-board imaging (OBI) and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) was computed to determine the error distribution, magnitude, and error difference between treatment phases. The systematic and random errors were calculated using the van Herk equation to determine the planning target volume (PTV) margin. Results: The setup error was -0.86 to 0.25 mm, and the residual error was -0.15 to 0.32 mm. The couch displacement percentage for OBI was 29.44% to 58.89%, and for CBCT was 8.10% to 34.12%. The systematic error was 1.65 to 3.21. The random error was 1.78 to 3.29. The setup error was greatest in the longitudinal (Lng) direction, residual error was greatest in the vertical (Vrt) direction, and systematic and random error were greatest in the Vrt and lateral (Lat) direction, respectively. The PTV margin was greatest in the Vrt direction, while the Lng direction was the narrowest margin for every treatment phase. Conclusion: The highest setup error occurs in the Lng direction for all treatment phases. For the 46 Gy and 60 Gy phases, the highest residual error is in the Vrt direction. However, in the 78 Gy phase, the error is relatively close to 0.01mm in every direction. The current IGRT protocol is effective in detecting setup and residual errors. The 78 Gy phase has the greatest PTV margin, whereas the 46 Gy phase shows the narrowest margins in all directions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":298884,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Associated Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"54 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Associated Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12982/jams.2024.036\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Associated Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12982/jams.2024.036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:体外放射治疗(EBRT)是前列腺癌的一种根治性治疗技术。由于前列腺不稳定,且被膀胱和直肠包围,因此靶点位置的精确性至关重要。图像引导放射治疗(IGRT)可以提高治疗的精确度。在图像引导放射治疗过程中,膀胱和直肠可能会改变体积,移动前列腺的位置,从而导致靶体积剂量遗漏和危险器官(OARs)剂量增加。目的:评估 IGRT 过程中的设置误差和残余剂量:评估前列腺癌患者定位过程中的设置误差和残余误差,以及当前 IGRT 方案的效率,同时建议规划目标容积 (PTV) 边界。材料和方法:计算机载成像(OBI)和锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)的偏移耦合参数,以确定治疗阶段之间的误差分布、误差大小和误差差异。使用范-赫克方程计算系统误差和随机误差,以确定规划靶体积(PTV)余量。结果显示设置误差为-0.86至0.25毫米,残余误差为-0.15至0.32毫米。OBI 耦合位移百分比为 29.44% 至 58.89%,CBCT 耦合位移百分比为 8.10% 至 34.12%。系统误差为 1.65 至 3.21。随机误差为 1.78 到 3.29。纵向(Lng)方向的设置误差最大,垂直(Vrt)方向的残余误差最大,Vrt 和侧向(Lat)方向的系统误差和随机误差分别最大。在每个治疗阶段,纵向(Vrt)方向的 PTV 边界最大,而横向(Lng)方向的边界最窄。结论:在所有治疗阶段,Lng 方向的设置误差最大。在 46 Gy 和 60 Gy 阶段,Vrt 方向的残余误差最大。然而,在 78 Gy 阶段,每个方向的误差都相对接近 0.01 毫米。目前的 IGRT 方案在检测设置误差和残余误差方面是有效的。78 Gy 阶段的 PTV 余量最大,而 46 Gy 阶段在所有方向上的余量最小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of the offset couch parameter between kilovoltage on-board imaging and cone-beam computed tomography in patients with prostate cancer
Background: External Beam Radiation Therapy (EBRT) is a curative therapy technique for prostate cancer. Since the prostate is unstable and surrounded by the bladder and rectum, precision of the target location is critical. Image Guided Radiation Therapy (IGRT) can improve treatment precision. The bladder and rectum may alter volume during IGRT, shifting the prostate’s position and resulting in missed target volume doses and extra organs at risk (OARs) doses. Objective: To assess setup error and residual error during patient positioning, as well as the current IGRT protocol efficiency, in prostate cancer patients while recommending a planning target volume (PTV) margin. Materials and methods: The offset couch parameter of on-board imaging (OBI) and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) was computed to determine the error distribution, magnitude, and error difference between treatment phases. The systematic and random errors were calculated using the van Herk equation to determine the planning target volume (PTV) margin. Results: The setup error was -0.86 to 0.25 mm, and the residual error was -0.15 to 0.32 mm. The couch displacement percentage for OBI was 29.44% to 58.89%, and for CBCT was 8.10% to 34.12%. The systematic error was 1.65 to 3.21. The random error was 1.78 to 3.29. The setup error was greatest in the longitudinal (Lng) direction, residual error was greatest in the vertical (Vrt) direction, and systematic and random error were greatest in the Vrt and lateral (Lat) direction, respectively. The PTV margin was greatest in the Vrt direction, while the Lng direction was the narrowest margin for every treatment phase. Conclusion: The highest setup error occurs in the Lng direction for all treatment phases. For the 46 Gy and 60 Gy phases, the highest residual error is in the Vrt direction. However, in the 78 Gy phase, the error is relatively close to 0.01mm in every direction. The current IGRT protocol is effective in detecting setup and residual errors. The 78 Gy phase has the greatest PTV margin, whereas the 46 Gy phase shows the narrowest margins in all directions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Does mild chronic obstructive pulmonary disease need a standard pulmonary rehabilitation program? A case report Balance abilities in high dynamic-sport athletes with different maximal voluntary contraction Preliminary study of distal forearm bone mineral density in residents of Doi Lo District: Observation and comparison with Mae Chaem, and Omkoi Districts, Chiang Mai Province, Thailand Community rehabilitation by the trained village health volunteers on activities of daily living and quality of life in stroke survivors Sine hunter prey optimization enabled deep residual network for diabetes mellitus detection using tongue image
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1