C. Collinge, Kashmeera Giga, Thomas Roser, George F. Lebus, Michael J. Beltran, Brett Crist, S. Sems, Michael J. Gardner, H. Sagi, M. Archdeacon, H. Mir, A. Rodriguez-Buitrago, P. Mitchell, P. Tornetta
{"title":"按 \"生命十年 \"比较股骨颈移位骨折患者修复后的治疗失败率:对 565 例 60 岁以下成人病例的分析","authors":"C. Collinge, Kashmeera Giga, Thomas Roser, George F. Lebus, Michael J. Beltran, Brett Crist, S. Sems, Michael J. Gardner, H. Sagi, M. Archdeacon, H. Mir, A. Rodriguez-Buitrago, P. Mitchell, P. Tornetta","doi":"10.1097/bot.0000000000002840","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n To study the results of displaced femoral neck fractures (FNFs) in adults less than 60 years of age by comparing patients, injury, treatment, and the characteristics of treatment failure specifically according to patients’ age at injury, i.e. by their “decade of life” (i.e. “under 30” [29 years and younger], “the 30’s” [30 to 39 years], “the 40’s” [40 to 49 years], and “the 50’s” [50 to 59 years]).\n \n \n \n \n Design: Multicenter retrospective comparative cohort series\n \n \n \n 26 North American Level 1 Trauma Centers.\n \n \n \n Skeletally mature patients aged 18 to 59 with operative repair of displaced FNFs.\n \n Outcome Measures and Comparisons: Main outcome measures were treatment failures (fixation failure and/or nonunion, osteonecrosis, malunion, and the need for subsequent major reconstructive surgery (arthroplasty or proximal femoral osteotomy). These were compared across decades of adult life through middle age (<30 years old, 30 to 39 years, 40 to 49 years, and 50-59 years).\n \n \n \n Overall, treatment failure was observed in 264 of 565 (47%) of all hips. The mean age was 42.2 years, 35.8% of patients were female, and the mean Pauwels’ angle was 53.8°. Complications and the need for major secondary surgeries increased with each increasing decade of life assessed: 36% failure occurred in 36% of patients ages <30 years, 40% in the 30’s, 48 in the 40’s, and 57% in the 50’s, respectively; p <0.001). Rates of osteonecrosis increased with decades of life (under 30’s and 30’s vs. 40’s vs. 50’s developed osteonecrosis in 10%, 10%, 20%, and 27% of hips, p <0.001), while fixation failure and/or nonunion only increased by decade of life to a level of trend (p =0.06). Reparative methods varied widely between decade-long age groups, including reduction type (open vs. closed, p<0.001), reduction quality (p=0.030), and construct type (cannulated screws (CS) vs. fixed angle devices,p=0.024), while some variables evaluated did not change with age group.\n \n \n \n Displaced FNFs in young and middle-aged adults are a challenging clinical problem with a high rate of treatment failure. Major complications and the need for complex reconstructive surgery increased greatly by decade of life with the patients in their 6th decade experiencing osteonecrosis at the highest rate seen among patients in the decades studied. Interestingly, treatments provided to patients in their 50’s were notably different than those provided to younger patient groups.\n \n \n \n Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.\n","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":"28 110","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":17.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treatment Failure After Repair of Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures in Patients compared by “Decade of Life”: An Analysis of 565 Cases in Adults Less than 60 Years Old\",\"authors\":\"C. Collinge, Kashmeera Giga, Thomas Roser, George F. Lebus, Michael J. Beltran, Brett Crist, S. Sems, Michael J. Gardner, H. Sagi, M. Archdeacon, H. Mir, A. Rodriguez-Buitrago, P. Mitchell, P. Tornetta\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/bot.0000000000002840\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n To study the results of displaced femoral neck fractures (FNFs) in adults less than 60 years of age by comparing patients, injury, treatment, and the characteristics of treatment failure specifically according to patients’ age at injury, i.e. by their “decade of life” (i.e. “under 30” [29 years and younger], “the 30’s” [30 to 39 years], “the 40’s” [40 to 49 years], and “the 50’s” [50 to 59 years]).\\n \\n \\n \\n \\n Design: Multicenter retrospective comparative cohort series\\n \\n \\n \\n 26 North American Level 1 Trauma Centers.\\n \\n \\n \\n Skeletally mature patients aged 18 to 59 with operative repair of displaced FNFs.\\n \\n Outcome Measures and Comparisons: Main outcome measures were treatment failures (fixation failure and/or nonunion, osteonecrosis, malunion, and the need for subsequent major reconstructive surgery (arthroplasty or proximal femoral osteotomy). These were compared across decades of adult life through middle age (<30 years old, 30 to 39 years, 40 to 49 years, and 50-59 years).\\n \\n \\n \\n Overall, treatment failure was observed in 264 of 565 (47%) of all hips. The mean age was 42.2 years, 35.8% of patients were female, and the mean Pauwels’ angle was 53.8°. Complications and the need for major secondary surgeries increased with each increasing decade of life assessed: 36% failure occurred in 36% of patients ages <30 years, 40% in the 30’s, 48 in the 40’s, and 57% in the 50’s, respectively; p <0.001). Rates of osteonecrosis increased with decades of life (under 30’s and 30’s vs. 40’s vs. 50’s developed osteonecrosis in 10%, 10%, 20%, and 27% of hips, p <0.001), while fixation failure and/or nonunion only increased by decade of life to a level of trend (p =0.06). Reparative methods varied widely between decade-long age groups, including reduction type (open vs. closed, p<0.001), reduction quality (p=0.030), and construct type (cannulated screws (CS) vs. fixed angle devices,p=0.024), while some variables evaluated did not change with age group.\\n \\n \\n \\n Displaced FNFs in young and middle-aged adults are a challenging clinical problem with a high rate of treatment failure. Major complications and the need for complex reconstructive surgery increased greatly by decade of life with the patients in their 6th decade experiencing osteonecrosis at the highest rate seen among patients in the decades studied. Interestingly, treatments provided to patients in their 50’s were notably different than those provided to younger patient groups.\\n \\n \\n \\n Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":\"28 110\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":17.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/bot.0000000000002840\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/bot.0000000000002840","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Treatment Failure After Repair of Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures in Patients compared by “Decade of Life”: An Analysis of 565 Cases in Adults Less than 60 Years Old
To study the results of displaced femoral neck fractures (FNFs) in adults less than 60 years of age by comparing patients, injury, treatment, and the characteristics of treatment failure specifically according to patients’ age at injury, i.e. by their “decade of life” (i.e. “under 30” [29 years and younger], “the 30’s” [30 to 39 years], “the 40’s” [40 to 49 years], and “the 50’s” [50 to 59 years]).
Design: Multicenter retrospective comparative cohort series
26 North American Level 1 Trauma Centers.
Skeletally mature patients aged 18 to 59 with operative repair of displaced FNFs.
Outcome Measures and Comparisons: Main outcome measures were treatment failures (fixation failure and/or nonunion, osteonecrosis, malunion, and the need for subsequent major reconstructive surgery (arthroplasty or proximal femoral osteotomy). These were compared across decades of adult life through middle age (<30 years old, 30 to 39 years, 40 to 49 years, and 50-59 years).
Overall, treatment failure was observed in 264 of 565 (47%) of all hips. The mean age was 42.2 years, 35.8% of patients were female, and the mean Pauwels’ angle was 53.8°. Complications and the need for major secondary surgeries increased with each increasing decade of life assessed: 36% failure occurred in 36% of patients ages <30 years, 40% in the 30’s, 48 in the 40’s, and 57% in the 50’s, respectively; p <0.001). Rates of osteonecrosis increased with decades of life (under 30’s and 30’s vs. 40’s vs. 50’s developed osteonecrosis in 10%, 10%, 20%, and 27% of hips, p <0.001), while fixation failure and/or nonunion only increased by decade of life to a level of trend (p =0.06). Reparative methods varied widely between decade-long age groups, including reduction type (open vs. closed, p<0.001), reduction quality (p=0.030), and construct type (cannulated screws (CS) vs. fixed angle devices,p=0.024), while some variables evaluated did not change with age group.
Displaced FNFs in young and middle-aged adults are a challenging clinical problem with a high rate of treatment failure. Major complications and the need for complex reconstructive surgery increased greatly by decade of life with the patients in their 6th decade experiencing osteonecrosis at the highest rate seen among patients in the decades studied. Interestingly, treatments provided to patients in their 50’s were notably different than those provided to younger patient groups.
Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
期刊介绍:
Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance.
Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.