石榴(Punica granatum L.)品种的形态和分子多样性分析与系统发育相关性研究

IF 0.9 4区 生物学 Q4 PLANT SCIENCES Israel Journal of Plant Sciences Pub Date : 2024-05-02 DOI:10.1163/22238980-bja10092
Rahul Sharma, Som Dev Sharma, Vikas Kumar Sharma, Reena Kumari, Shireen Khatri
{"title":"石榴(Punica granatum L.)品种的形态和分子多样性分析与系统发育相关性研究","authors":"Rahul Sharma, Som Dev Sharma, Vikas Kumar Sharma, Reena Kumari, Shireen Khatri","doi":"10.1163/22238980-bja10092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nIdentification of different pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) genotypes using morphological descriptors and further substantiated through molecular means is essential for a breeding program. Characterization using molecular markers has an advantage over its morphological counterpart due to its low expense, quick and reliable results, and the requirement of less sophisticated equipment. In this study, eight different pomegranate cultivars were characterized based on their morphological and molecular characters in sub-tropical regions between 2018 and 2019. Morphological experiments were conducted in a randomized block design replicated thrice for each cultivar, whereas RAPD markers were employed for molecular studies. Principal component analysis revealed significant morphological variation (79.61%) among the cultivars. A high level of polymorphism, similar to PCA, was observed with RAPD analysis (80.49%). Some discrepancies between morphological and molecular results were noted in UPGMA cluster analysis. However, eight primers (total = 41) distinctively separated the Bhagwa variety from others, with the maximum similarity coefficient value (ca. 0.54) and superior fruit quality distinguished in PCA analysis with the maximum mean Euclidean distance (ca. 16). Hence, RAPD markers could be used along with morphological markers for a quick screening of germplasms in further crop improvement programs.","PeriodicalId":14689,"journal":{"name":"Israel Journal of Plant Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Morphological and molecular diversity analysis vis-a-vis phylogenetic correlation among pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) varieties\",\"authors\":\"Rahul Sharma, Som Dev Sharma, Vikas Kumar Sharma, Reena Kumari, Shireen Khatri\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/22238980-bja10092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nIdentification of different pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) genotypes using morphological descriptors and further substantiated through molecular means is essential for a breeding program. Characterization using molecular markers has an advantage over its morphological counterpart due to its low expense, quick and reliable results, and the requirement of less sophisticated equipment. In this study, eight different pomegranate cultivars were characterized based on their morphological and molecular characters in sub-tropical regions between 2018 and 2019. Morphological experiments were conducted in a randomized block design replicated thrice for each cultivar, whereas RAPD markers were employed for molecular studies. Principal component analysis revealed significant morphological variation (79.61%) among the cultivars. A high level of polymorphism, similar to PCA, was observed with RAPD analysis (80.49%). Some discrepancies between morphological and molecular results were noted in UPGMA cluster analysis. However, eight primers (total = 41) distinctively separated the Bhagwa variety from others, with the maximum similarity coefficient value (ca. 0.54) and superior fruit quality distinguished in PCA analysis with the maximum mean Euclidean distance (ca. 16). Hence, RAPD markers could be used along with morphological markers for a quick screening of germplasms in further crop improvement programs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14689,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Israel Journal of Plant Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Israel Journal of Plant Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/22238980-bja10092\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PLANT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Israel Journal of Plant Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/22238980-bja10092","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

利用形态描述符鉴定不同的石榴(Punica granatum L.)基因型,并通过分子手段进一步证实其基因型,对育种计划至关重要。利用分子标记进行鉴定比形态学鉴定更有优势,因为其费用低、结果快速可靠,而且不需要复杂的设备。在本研究中,2018 年至 2019 年期间,在亚热带地区根据形态和分子特征对 8 个不同的石榴栽培品种进行了表征。形态学实验采用随机区组设计,每个栽培品种重复三次,分子研究则采用 RAPD 标记。主成分分析表明,各栽培品种之间存在明显的形态差异(79.61%)。RAPD 分析也观察到了与 PCA 相似的高水平多态性(80.49%)。在 UPGMA 聚类分析中,形态和分子结果之间存在一些差异。然而,有 8 个引物(共 41 个)将 Bhagwa 品种与其他品种明显区分开来,相似性系数最大(约 0.54),在 PCA 分析中,果实质量上乘,平均欧氏距离最大(约 16)。因此,在进一步的作物改良计划中,RAPD 标记可与形态标记一起用于种质的快速筛选。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Morphological and molecular diversity analysis vis-a-vis phylogenetic correlation among pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) varieties
Identification of different pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) genotypes using morphological descriptors and further substantiated through molecular means is essential for a breeding program. Characterization using molecular markers has an advantage over its morphological counterpart due to its low expense, quick and reliable results, and the requirement of less sophisticated equipment. In this study, eight different pomegranate cultivars were characterized based on their morphological and molecular characters in sub-tropical regions between 2018 and 2019. Morphological experiments were conducted in a randomized block design replicated thrice for each cultivar, whereas RAPD markers were employed for molecular studies. Principal component analysis revealed significant morphological variation (79.61%) among the cultivars. A high level of polymorphism, similar to PCA, was observed with RAPD analysis (80.49%). Some discrepancies between morphological and molecular results were noted in UPGMA cluster analysis. However, eight primers (total = 41) distinctively separated the Bhagwa variety from others, with the maximum similarity coefficient value (ca. 0.54) and superior fruit quality distinguished in PCA analysis with the maximum mean Euclidean distance (ca. 16). Hence, RAPD markers could be used along with morphological markers for a quick screening of germplasms in further crop improvement programs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Israel Journal of Plant Sciences
Israel Journal of Plant Sciences 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Israel Journal of Plant Sciences is an international journal of extensive scope that publishes special issues dealing with all aspects of plant sciences, including but not limited to: physiology, cell biology, development, botany, genetic
期刊最新文献
Morphological and molecular diversity analysis vis-a-vis phylogenetic correlation among pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) varieties Morphological, structural, and ultrastructural key features of hyperhydricity in Beta vulgaris L. var. saccharifera Alternative products for breaking dormancy in ‘Reubennel’ plum in subtropical regions Evaluation of morpho-physiological and biochemical indicators of salinity stress in Argemone mexicana L., medicinal plant from Papaveraceae Effect of salt stress on morpho-physiological and anatomical attributes of Salix clones
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1