公共部门管理人员在工作场所采用人工智能的意向决定因素

IF 0.8 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE International Journal of Public Administration in the Digital Age Pub Date : 2024-05-02 DOI:10.4018/ijpada.342849
Khalid Majrashi
{"title":"公共部门管理人员在工作场所采用人工智能的意向决定因素","authors":"Khalid Majrashi","doi":"10.4018/ijpada.342849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigated the determinants of public sector managers' intentions to adopt artificial intelligence (AI) systems within their organizations. An extended technology acceptance model (TAM) was developed, incorporating additional constructs including fairness, humanity, reliability, safety, transparency, accountability, privacy, security, trust, social norms, tolerance, impact, and isomorphic pressure. A survey was conducted among 330 public sector managers, and the data were analyzed using linear regression tests to evaluate the model. The results showed significant positive influences of both perceived usefulness and perceived impact on managers' attitudes and behavioral intentions toward AI adoption. Isomorphic pressure was also a significant determinant of managers' behavioral intentions toward adopting AI systems. Our findings also indicated that perceptions related to AI ethical principles, such as transparency, privacy, and security, influenced managers' trust in AI systems.","PeriodicalId":42809,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Public Administration in the Digital Age","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determinants of Public Sector Managers' Intentions to Adopt AI in the Workplace\",\"authors\":\"Khalid Majrashi\",\"doi\":\"10.4018/ijpada.342849\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study investigated the determinants of public sector managers' intentions to adopt artificial intelligence (AI) systems within their organizations. An extended technology acceptance model (TAM) was developed, incorporating additional constructs including fairness, humanity, reliability, safety, transparency, accountability, privacy, security, trust, social norms, tolerance, impact, and isomorphic pressure. A survey was conducted among 330 public sector managers, and the data were analyzed using linear regression tests to evaluate the model. The results showed significant positive influences of both perceived usefulness and perceived impact on managers' attitudes and behavioral intentions toward AI adoption. Isomorphic pressure was also a significant determinant of managers' behavioral intentions toward adopting AI systems. Our findings also indicated that perceptions related to AI ethical principles, such as transparency, privacy, and security, influenced managers' trust in AI systems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42809,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Public Administration in the Digital Age\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Public Administration in the Digital Age\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4018/ijpada.342849\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Public Administration in the Digital Age","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/ijpada.342849","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究调查了公共部门管理人员在其组织内采用人工智能(AI)系统的意向的决定因素。研究开发了一个扩展的技术接受模型(TAM),其中纳入了公平性、人性化、可靠性、安全性、透明度、问责制、隐私性、安全性、信任度、社会规范、容忍度、影响和同构压力等额外的概念。对 330 名公共部门管理人员进行了调查,并使用线性回归测试对数据进行了分析,以评估模型。结果表明,感知有用性和感知影响对管理人员采用人工智能的态度和行为意向有明显的正向影响。同构压力也是管理人员采用人工智能系统行为意向的重要决定因素。我们的研究结果还表明,与人工智能道德原则相关的认知,如透明度、隐私性和安全性,会影响管理人员对人工智能系统的信任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Determinants of Public Sector Managers' Intentions to Adopt AI in the Workplace
This study investigated the determinants of public sector managers' intentions to adopt artificial intelligence (AI) systems within their organizations. An extended technology acceptance model (TAM) was developed, incorporating additional constructs including fairness, humanity, reliability, safety, transparency, accountability, privacy, security, trust, social norms, tolerance, impact, and isomorphic pressure. A survey was conducted among 330 public sector managers, and the data were analyzed using linear regression tests to evaluate the model. The results showed significant positive influences of both perceived usefulness and perceived impact on managers' attitudes and behavioral intentions toward AI adoption. Isomorphic pressure was also a significant determinant of managers' behavioral intentions toward adopting AI systems. Our findings also indicated that perceptions related to AI ethical principles, such as transparency, privacy, and security, influenced managers' trust in AI systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊最新文献
Lighthouse in the Mist Determinants of Public Sector Managers' Intentions to Adopt AI in the Workplace Configurational Analysis of Infrastructuring in Digital Identity Platforms An Evaluation Framework for the Impact of Digitalization on the Quality of Governance The Correspondence Between PIKSA Model and the Community's Well-Being
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1