乳腺癌预后因素对卵巢储备和生育力保存中卵巢刺激反应的影响

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Reproductive biomedicine online Pub Date : 2024-05-17 DOI:10.1016/j.rbmo.2024.104109
{"title":"乳腺癌预后因素对卵巢储备和生育力保存中卵巢刺激反应的影响","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.rbmo.2024.104109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Research question</h3><p>Do breast cancer prognostic factors influence ovarian reserve and response to ovarian stimulation in the context of fertility preservation?</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Observational, bicentric retrospective study of 352 women with breast cancer who underwent ovarian stimulation using a random start gonadotrophin releasing hormone antagonist protocol and vitrified oocytes between November 2015 and August 2022. Serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels and antral follicle count (AFC) were measured. The number of oocytes recovered, maturation rate and follicular output rate (FORT) were analysed according to patients’ characteristics and breast cancer prognostic factors.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Median age was 34 years (31.1–37.1). Median AFC and serum AMH level were 17 (12–26) follicles and 2 (1.2–3.4) ng/ml, respectively. After ovarian stimulation, 10.5 (6.0–16.0) oocytes were recovered, with eight (4–13) being mature. Mean oocyte maturation rate was 79% (62–92). Antral follicle count (&gt;12) significantly affected the risk of recovering fewer than eight mature oocytes (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001, multivariate analysis). Follicular responsiveness to FSH, assessed by the follicular output rate (FORT index) and number of oocytes recovered, were 31% (21–50) and 10.5% (6.0–16.0), respectively. FORT index and ovarian stimulation outcomes were not influenced by breast cancer prognostic factors.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Breast cancer prognostic factors do not influence ovarian reserve markers or response to ovarian stimulation in fertility preservation. Therefore, tumour grade, triple-negative status, HER2 overexpression and high Ki67 should not alter the fertility-preservation strategy when considering ovarian stimulation for oocyte vitrification.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21134,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive biomedicine online","volume":"49 5","pages":"Article 104109"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1472648324002980/pdfft?md5=57be71477de5d0a955ae8088a69204f3&pid=1-s2.0-S1472648324002980-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of breast cancer prognostic factors on ovarian reserve and response in fertility preservation\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rbmo.2024.104109\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Research question</h3><p>Do breast cancer prognostic factors influence ovarian reserve and response to ovarian stimulation in the context of fertility preservation?</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Observational, bicentric retrospective study of 352 women with breast cancer who underwent ovarian stimulation using a random start gonadotrophin releasing hormone antagonist protocol and vitrified oocytes between November 2015 and August 2022. Serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels and antral follicle count (AFC) were measured. The number of oocytes recovered, maturation rate and follicular output rate (FORT) were analysed according to patients’ characteristics and breast cancer prognostic factors.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Median age was 34 years (31.1–37.1). Median AFC and serum AMH level were 17 (12–26) follicles and 2 (1.2–3.4) ng/ml, respectively. After ovarian stimulation, 10.5 (6.0–16.0) oocytes were recovered, with eight (4–13) being mature. Mean oocyte maturation rate was 79% (62–92). Antral follicle count (&gt;12) significantly affected the risk of recovering fewer than eight mature oocytes (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001, multivariate analysis). Follicular responsiveness to FSH, assessed by the follicular output rate (FORT index) and number of oocytes recovered, were 31% (21–50) and 10.5% (6.0–16.0), respectively. FORT index and ovarian stimulation outcomes were not influenced by breast cancer prognostic factors.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Breast cancer prognostic factors do not influence ovarian reserve markers or response to ovarian stimulation in fertility preservation. Therefore, tumour grade, triple-negative status, HER2 overexpression and high Ki67 should not alter the fertility-preservation strategy when considering ovarian stimulation for oocyte vitrification.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21134,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reproductive biomedicine online\",\"volume\":\"49 5\",\"pages\":\"Article 104109\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1472648324002980/pdfft?md5=57be71477de5d0a955ae8088a69204f3&pid=1-s2.0-S1472648324002980-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reproductive biomedicine online\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1472648324002980\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive biomedicine online","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1472648324002980","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究问题乳腺癌预后因素是否会影响卵巢储备功能以及在保留生育力的情况下对卵巢刺激的反应?设计对2015年11月至2022年8月期间使用随机起始促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂方案和玻璃化卵母细胞进行卵巢刺激的352名乳腺癌女性进行观察性双中心回顾研究。测量了血清抗缪勒氏管激素(AMH)水平和前卵泡计数(AFC)。根据患者特征和乳腺癌预后因素,对回收的卵母细胞数量、成熟率和卵泡产出率(FORT)进行了分析。中位 AFC 和血清 AMH 水平分别为 17 (12-26) 个卵泡和 2 (1.2-3.4) 纳克/毫升。卵巢刺激后,回收了 10.5(6.0-16.0)个卵母细胞,其中 8(4-13)个成熟。平均卵母细胞成熟率为 79%(62-92)。前区卵泡数(>12)显著影响成熟卵母细胞少于 8 个的风险(P <0.0001,多变量分析)。以卵泡产出率(FORT指数)和回收卵母细胞数评估的卵泡对FSH的反应性分别为31%(21-50)和10.5%(6.0-16.0)。FORT指数和卵巢刺激结果不受乳腺癌预后因素的影响。因此,在考虑卵巢刺激卵母细胞玻璃化时,肿瘤分级、三阴状态、HER2过表达和高Ki67不应改变生育力保存策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of breast cancer prognostic factors on ovarian reserve and response in fertility preservation

Research question

Do breast cancer prognostic factors influence ovarian reserve and response to ovarian stimulation in the context of fertility preservation?

Design

Observational, bicentric retrospective study of 352 women with breast cancer who underwent ovarian stimulation using a random start gonadotrophin releasing hormone antagonist protocol and vitrified oocytes between November 2015 and August 2022. Serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels and antral follicle count (AFC) were measured. The number of oocytes recovered, maturation rate and follicular output rate (FORT) were analysed according to patients’ characteristics and breast cancer prognostic factors.

Results

Median age was 34 years (31.1–37.1). Median AFC and serum AMH level were 17 (12–26) follicles and 2 (1.2–3.4) ng/ml, respectively. After ovarian stimulation, 10.5 (6.0–16.0) oocytes were recovered, with eight (4–13) being mature. Mean oocyte maturation rate was 79% (62–92). Antral follicle count (>12) significantly affected the risk of recovering fewer than eight mature oocytes (P < 0.0001, multivariate analysis). Follicular responsiveness to FSH, assessed by the follicular output rate (FORT index) and number of oocytes recovered, were 31% (21–50) and 10.5% (6.0–16.0), respectively. FORT index and ovarian stimulation outcomes were not influenced by breast cancer prognostic factors.

Conclusion

Breast cancer prognostic factors do not influence ovarian reserve markers or response to ovarian stimulation in fertility preservation. Therefore, tumour grade, triple-negative status, HER2 overexpression and high Ki67 should not alter the fertility-preservation strategy when considering ovarian stimulation for oocyte vitrification.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reproductive biomedicine online
Reproductive biomedicine online 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
7.50%
发文量
391
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: Reproductive BioMedicine Online covers the formation, growth and differentiation of the human embryo. It is intended to bring to public attention new research on biological and clinical research on human reproduction and the human embryo including relevant studies on animals. It is published by a group of scientists and clinicians working in these fields of study. Its audience comprises researchers, clinicians, practitioners, academics and patients. Context: The period of human embryonic growth covered is between the formation of the primordial germ cells in the fetus until mid-pregnancy. High quality research on lower animals is included if it helps to clarify the human situation. Studies progressing to birth and later are published if they have a direct bearing on events in the earlier stages of pregnancy.
期刊最新文献
Ultra-fast vitrification and rapid elution of human oocytes: part I. germinal vesicle model validation. Ultra-fast vitrification and rapid elution of human oocytes: Part II - verification of blastocyst development from mature oocytes. Inside Front Cover - Affiliations and First page of TOC Front Matter - Continued TOC Outside Back Cover - Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1