{"title":"乳腺癌预后因素对卵巢储备和生育力保存中卵巢刺激反应的影响","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.rbmo.2024.104109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Research question</h3><p>Do breast cancer prognostic factors influence ovarian reserve and response to ovarian stimulation in the context of fertility preservation?</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Observational, bicentric retrospective study of 352 women with breast cancer who underwent ovarian stimulation using a random start gonadotrophin releasing hormone antagonist protocol and vitrified oocytes between November 2015 and August 2022. Serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels and antral follicle count (AFC) were measured. The number of oocytes recovered, maturation rate and follicular output rate (FORT) were analysed according to patients’ characteristics and breast cancer prognostic factors.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Median age was 34 years (31.1–37.1). Median AFC and serum AMH level were 17 (12–26) follicles and 2 (1.2–3.4) ng/ml, respectively. After ovarian stimulation, 10.5 (6.0–16.0) oocytes were recovered, with eight (4–13) being mature. Mean oocyte maturation rate was 79% (62–92). Antral follicle count (>12) significantly affected the risk of recovering fewer than eight mature oocytes (<em>P</em> < 0.0001, multivariate analysis). Follicular responsiveness to FSH, assessed by the follicular output rate (FORT index) and number of oocytes recovered, were 31% (21–50) and 10.5% (6.0–16.0), respectively. FORT index and ovarian stimulation outcomes were not influenced by breast cancer prognostic factors.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Breast cancer prognostic factors do not influence ovarian reserve markers or response to ovarian stimulation in fertility preservation. Therefore, tumour grade, triple-negative status, HER2 overexpression and high Ki67 should not alter the fertility-preservation strategy when considering ovarian stimulation for oocyte vitrification.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21134,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive biomedicine online","volume":"49 5","pages":"Article 104109"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1472648324002980/pdfft?md5=57be71477de5d0a955ae8088a69204f3&pid=1-s2.0-S1472648324002980-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of breast cancer prognostic factors on ovarian reserve and response in fertility preservation\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rbmo.2024.104109\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Research question</h3><p>Do breast cancer prognostic factors influence ovarian reserve and response to ovarian stimulation in the context of fertility preservation?</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Observational, bicentric retrospective study of 352 women with breast cancer who underwent ovarian stimulation using a random start gonadotrophin releasing hormone antagonist protocol and vitrified oocytes between November 2015 and August 2022. Serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels and antral follicle count (AFC) were measured. The number of oocytes recovered, maturation rate and follicular output rate (FORT) were analysed according to patients’ characteristics and breast cancer prognostic factors.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Median age was 34 years (31.1–37.1). Median AFC and serum AMH level were 17 (12–26) follicles and 2 (1.2–3.4) ng/ml, respectively. After ovarian stimulation, 10.5 (6.0–16.0) oocytes were recovered, with eight (4–13) being mature. Mean oocyte maturation rate was 79% (62–92). Antral follicle count (>12) significantly affected the risk of recovering fewer than eight mature oocytes (<em>P</em> < 0.0001, multivariate analysis). Follicular responsiveness to FSH, assessed by the follicular output rate (FORT index) and number of oocytes recovered, were 31% (21–50) and 10.5% (6.0–16.0), respectively. FORT index and ovarian stimulation outcomes were not influenced by breast cancer prognostic factors.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Breast cancer prognostic factors do not influence ovarian reserve markers or response to ovarian stimulation in fertility preservation. Therefore, tumour grade, triple-negative status, HER2 overexpression and high Ki67 should not alter the fertility-preservation strategy when considering ovarian stimulation for oocyte vitrification.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21134,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reproductive biomedicine online\",\"volume\":\"49 5\",\"pages\":\"Article 104109\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1472648324002980/pdfft?md5=57be71477de5d0a955ae8088a69204f3&pid=1-s2.0-S1472648324002980-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reproductive biomedicine online\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1472648324002980\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive biomedicine online","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1472648324002980","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effect of breast cancer prognostic factors on ovarian reserve and response in fertility preservation
Research question
Do breast cancer prognostic factors influence ovarian reserve and response to ovarian stimulation in the context of fertility preservation?
Design
Observational, bicentric retrospective study of 352 women with breast cancer who underwent ovarian stimulation using a random start gonadotrophin releasing hormone antagonist protocol and vitrified oocytes between November 2015 and August 2022. Serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels and antral follicle count (AFC) were measured. The number of oocytes recovered, maturation rate and follicular output rate (FORT) were analysed according to patients’ characteristics and breast cancer prognostic factors.
Results
Median age was 34 years (31.1–37.1). Median AFC and serum AMH level were 17 (12–26) follicles and 2 (1.2–3.4) ng/ml, respectively. After ovarian stimulation, 10.5 (6.0–16.0) oocytes were recovered, with eight (4–13) being mature. Mean oocyte maturation rate was 79% (62–92). Antral follicle count (>12) significantly affected the risk of recovering fewer than eight mature oocytes (P < 0.0001, multivariate analysis). Follicular responsiveness to FSH, assessed by the follicular output rate (FORT index) and number of oocytes recovered, were 31% (21–50) and 10.5% (6.0–16.0), respectively. FORT index and ovarian stimulation outcomes were not influenced by breast cancer prognostic factors.
Conclusion
Breast cancer prognostic factors do not influence ovarian reserve markers or response to ovarian stimulation in fertility preservation. Therefore, tumour grade, triple-negative status, HER2 overexpression and high Ki67 should not alter the fertility-preservation strategy when considering ovarian stimulation for oocyte vitrification.
期刊介绍:
Reproductive BioMedicine Online covers the formation, growth and differentiation of the human embryo. It is intended to bring to public attention new research on biological and clinical research on human reproduction and the human embryo including relevant studies on animals. It is published by a group of scientists and clinicians working in these fields of study. Its audience comprises researchers, clinicians, practitioners, academics and patients.
Context:
The period of human embryonic growth covered is between the formation of the primordial germ cells in the fetus until mid-pregnancy. High quality research on lower animals is included if it helps to clarify the human situation. Studies progressing to birth and later are published if they have a direct bearing on events in the earlier stages of pregnancy.