新型腔内平台和先进技术:应由消化内科医生还是外科医生铺平道路?

Alberto Arezzo , Filippo Pepe
{"title":"新型腔内平台和先进技术:应由消化内科医生还是外科医生铺平道路?","authors":"Alberto Arezzo ,&nbsp;Filippo Pepe","doi":"10.1016/j.scrs.2024.101025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Nowadays, endoscopy has achieved amazing results in the treatment of benign and malignant pathologies, but it has yet to establish itself fully in the sense of an operative endoscopy. It is commonly believed that traditional endoscopy has reached its limits due to the intrinsic characteristics of existing platforms. Numerous robotic endoluminal platforms have been developed to overcome limitations in recent years. Existing robotic endoluminal platforms can be divided into three categories: fully robotic flexible endoscopic, robotic add-on systems, and traditional surgery-based platforms. These platforms are incredible pieces of technology, but in reality, they can only be considered a bridge to a genuinely robotic surgical system. Nowadays, both gastroenterologists and surgeons perform endoscopic procedures all over the world. We believe these platforms, leading to increased manipulation possibilities, may require an increasingly excellent knowledge of surgical techniques to develop their potential fully. Surgeons' unique training and experience push surgeons to take the lead in endoscopic operations over gastroenterologists due to the potential advantages in surgical precision and patient outcomes. However, gastroenterologists deeply understand gastrointestinal disorders and a collaborative effort between them and surgeons can lead to an efficient approach to endoscopic surgery.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55956,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery","volume":"35 2","pages":"Article 101025"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043148924000241/pdfft?md5=1c7c82c30dfcb4e5d5dfe60fb76cba8e&pid=1-s2.0-S1043148924000241-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New Endoluminal platforms and advancements in technology: Should Gastroenterologists or Surgeons pave the way?\",\"authors\":\"Alberto Arezzo ,&nbsp;Filippo Pepe\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.scrs.2024.101025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Nowadays, endoscopy has achieved amazing results in the treatment of benign and malignant pathologies, but it has yet to establish itself fully in the sense of an operative endoscopy. It is commonly believed that traditional endoscopy has reached its limits due to the intrinsic characteristics of existing platforms. Numerous robotic endoluminal platforms have been developed to overcome limitations in recent years. Existing robotic endoluminal platforms can be divided into three categories: fully robotic flexible endoscopic, robotic add-on systems, and traditional surgery-based platforms. These platforms are incredible pieces of technology, but in reality, they can only be considered a bridge to a genuinely robotic surgical system. Nowadays, both gastroenterologists and surgeons perform endoscopic procedures all over the world. We believe these platforms, leading to increased manipulation possibilities, may require an increasingly excellent knowledge of surgical techniques to develop their potential fully. Surgeons' unique training and experience push surgeons to take the lead in endoscopic operations over gastroenterologists due to the potential advantages in surgical precision and patient outcomes. However, gastroenterologists deeply understand gastrointestinal disorders and a collaborative effort between them and surgeons can lead to an efficient approach to endoscopic surgery.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55956,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery\",\"volume\":\"35 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 101025\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043148924000241/pdfft?md5=1c7c82c30dfcb4e5d5dfe60fb76cba8e&pid=1-s2.0-S1043148924000241-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043148924000241\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043148924000241","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

如今,内窥镜在治疗良性和恶性病变方面取得了令人惊叹的成果,但它在手术内窥镜的意义上尚未完全确立。人们普遍认为,由于现有平台的固有特性,传统内窥镜已经达到了极限。近年来,许多机器人内腔镜平台应运而生,以克服其局限性。现有的机器人腔内平台可分为三类:全机器人柔性内窥镜、机器人附加系统和基于传统手术的平台。这些平台都是令人难以置信的技术,但实际上,它们只能被视为通向真正机器人手术系统的桥梁。如今,世界各地的消化内科医生和外科医生都在进行内窥镜手术。我们认为,这些平台提高了操作的可能性,但要充分发挥其潜力,可能需要越来越精湛的外科技术知识。外科医生的独特培训和经验促使他们在内窥镜手术方面领先于消化内科医生,因为这可能在手术精确度和患者疗效方面具有优势。然而,胃肠病学家对胃肠道疾病有着深刻的理解,他们与外科医生之间的合作可以为内窥镜手术带来高效的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
New Endoluminal platforms and advancements in technology: Should Gastroenterologists or Surgeons pave the way?

Nowadays, endoscopy has achieved amazing results in the treatment of benign and malignant pathologies, but it has yet to establish itself fully in the sense of an operative endoscopy. It is commonly believed that traditional endoscopy has reached its limits due to the intrinsic characteristics of existing platforms. Numerous robotic endoluminal platforms have been developed to overcome limitations in recent years. Existing robotic endoluminal platforms can be divided into three categories: fully robotic flexible endoscopic, robotic add-on systems, and traditional surgery-based platforms. These platforms are incredible pieces of technology, but in reality, they can only be considered a bridge to a genuinely robotic surgical system. Nowadays, both gastroenterologists and surgeons perform endoscopic procedures all over the world. We believe these platforms, leading to increased manipulation possibilities, may require an increasingly excellent knowledge of surgical techniques to develop their potential fully. Surgeons' unique training and experience push surgeons to take the lead in endoscopic operations over gastroenterologists due to the potential advantages in surgical precision and patient outcomes. However, gastroenterologists deeply understand gastrointestinal disorders and a collaborative effort between them and surgeons can lead to an efficient approach to endoscopic surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: Seminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery offers a comprehensive and coordinated review of a single, timely topic related to the diagnosis and treatment of proctologic diseases. Each issue is an organized compendium of practical information that serves as a lasting reference for colorectal surgeons, general surgeons, surgeons in training and their colleagues in medicine with an interest in colorectal disorders.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Introduction Consilience of healthcare legislation, complexity science & computational analysis Artificial intelligence for the colorectal surgeon in 2024 – A narrative review of Prevalence, Policies, and (needed) Protections The impact of federally legislated colon and rectal cancer screening programs and policy in the United States
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1