与儿科急诊室护理有关的安全事故

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS Anales de pediatria Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.anpedi.2024.04.010
Dolores Beteta Fernández , Ana Miriam Seva Llor , Laura Martínez Alarcón , Carlos Pérez Cánovas , Manuel Pardo Rios , Julián Alcaraz Martínez
{"title":"与儿科急诊室护理有关的安全事故","authors":"Dolores Beteta Fernández ,&nbsp;Ana Miriam Seva Llor ,&nbsp;Laura Martínez Alarcón ,&nbsp;Carlos Pérez Cánovas ,&nbsp;Manuel Pardo Rios ,&nbsp;Julián Alcaraz Martínez","doi":"10.1016/j.anpedi.2024.04.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To characterize safety incidents in paediatric emergency departments (PEDs): frequency, sources, root causes, and consequences.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>We conducted a cross-sectional, observational and descriptive study in the PED of the Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca (HCUVA). Patients were recruited through opportunity sampling and the data were collected during care delivery and one week later through a telephone survey. The methodology was based on the ERIDA study on patient safety incidents related to emergency care, which in turn was based on the ENEAS and EVADUR studies.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The study included a total of 204 cases. At least one incident was detected in 25 cases, with two incidents detected in 3 cases, for a total incidence of 12.3%. Twelve incidents were detected during care delivery and the rest during the telephone call. Ten percent did not reach the patient, 7.1% reached the patient but caused no harm, and 82.1% reached the patient and caused harm. Thirteen incidents (46.4%) did not have an impact on care delivery, 8 (28.6%) required a new visit or referral, 6 (21.4%) required additional observation and 1 (3.6%) medical or surgical treatment. The most frequent root causes were health care delivery and medication. Incidents related to procedures and medication were most frequent. Of all incidents, 78.6% were considered preventable, with 50% identified as clear failures in health care delivery.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Safety incidents affected 12.3% of children managed in the PED of the HCUVA, of which 78.6% were preventable.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7783,"journal":{"name":"Anales de pediatria","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1695403324000924/pdfft?md5=f54b8ff8272d360a77df1b8806a9c610&pid=1-s2.0-S1695403324000924-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incidentes de seguridad ligados a la asistencia en los servicios de urgencias pediátricas\",\"authors\":\"Dolores Beteta Fernández ,&nbsp;Ana Miriam Seva Llor ,&nbsp;Laura Martínez Alarcón ,&nbsp;Carlos Pérez Cánovas ,&nbsp;Manuel Pardo Rios ,&nbsp;Julián Alcaraz Martínez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.anpedi.2024.04.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To characterize safety incidents in paediatric emergency departments (PEDs): frequency, sources, root causes, and consequences.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>We conducted a cross-sectional, observational and descriptive study in the PED of the Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca (HCUVA). Patients were recruited through opportunity sampling and the data were collected during care delivery and one week later through a telephone survey. The methodology was based on the ERIDA study on patient safety incidents related to emergency care, which in turn was based on the ENEAS and EVADUR studies.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The study included a total of 204 cases. At least one incident was detected in 25 cases, with two incidents detected in 3 cases, for a total incidence of 12.3%. Twelve incidents were detected during care delivery and the rest during the telephone call. Ten percent did not reach the patient, 7.1% reached the patient but caused no harm, and 82.1% reached the patient and caused harm. Thirteen incidents (46.4%) did not have an impact on care delivery, 8 (28.6%) required a new visit or referral, 6 (21.4%) required additional observation and 1 (3.6%) medical or surgical treatment. The most frequent root causes were health care delivery and medication. Incidents related to procedures and medication were most frequent. Of all incidents, 78.6% were considered preventable, with 50% identified as clear failures in health care delivery.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Safety incidents affected 12.3% of children managed in the PED of the HCUVA, of which 78.6% were preventable.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7783,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anales de pediatria\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1695403324000924/pdfft?md5=f54b8ff8272d360a77df1b8806a9c610&pid=1-s2.0-S1695403324000924-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anales de pediatria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1695403324000924\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anales de pediatria","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1695403324000924","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

材料和方法 我们在阿里亚卡圣女大学医院(HCUVA)急诊科进行了一项横断面观察性描述研究。我们通过机会抽样的方式招募患者,并在护理过程中和一周后通过电话调查收集数据。研究方法以ERIDA急诊患者安全事故研究为基础,而ERIDA研究又以ENEAS和EVADUR研究为基础。其中 25 例至少发现一起事故,3 例发现两起事故,总发生率为 12.3%。有 12 起事件是在护理过程中发现的,其余是在电话呼叫过程中发现的。10%的事件未发生在患者身上,7.1%的事件发生在患者身上但未造成伤害,82.1%的事件发生在患者身上但造成了伤害。13起事件(46.4%)未对护理服务造成影响,8起(28.6%)需要重新就诊或转诊,6起(21.4%)需要额外观察,1起(3.6%)需要内科或外科治疗。最常见的根本原因是医疗服务和用药。与手术和用药有关的事故最为常见。在所有事件中,78.6%被认为是可以预防的,其中50%被认定为医疗服务中的明显失误。结论安全事件影响了12.3%在克罗地亚儿童医护人员学院PED接受管理的儿童,其中78.6%是可以预防的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Incidentes de seguridad ligados a la asistencia en los servicios de urgencias pediátricas

Objective

To characterize safety incidents in paediatric emergency departments (PEDs): frequency, sources, root causes, and consequences.

Materials and methods

We conducted a cross-sectional, observational and descriptive study in the PED of the Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca (HCUVA). Patients were recruited through opportunity sampling and the data were collected during care delivery and one week later through a telephone survey. The methodology was based on the ERIDA study on patient safety incidents related to emergency care, which in turn was based on the ENEAS and EVADUR studies.

Results

The study included a total of 204 cases. At least one incident was detected in 25 cases, with two incidents detected in 3 cases, for a total incidence of 12.3%. Twelve incidents were detected during care delivery and the rest during the telephone call. Ten percent did not reach the patient, 7.1% reached the patient but caused no harm, and 82.1% reached the patient and caused harm. Thirteen incidents (46.4%) did not have an impact on care delivery, 8 (28.6%) required a new visit or referral, 6 (21.4%) required additional observation and 1 (3.6%) medical or surgical treatment. The most frequent root causes were health care delivery and medication. Incidents related to procedures and medication were most frequent. Of all incidents, 78.6% were considered preventable, with 50% identified as clear failures in health care delivery.

Conclusions

Safety incidents affected 12.3% of children managed in the PED of the HCUVA, of which 78.6% were preventable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Anales de pediatria
Anales de pediatria 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
4.80%
发文量
155
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: La Asociación Española de Pediatría tiene como uno de sus objetivos principales la difusión de información científica rigurosa y actualizada sobre las distintas áreas de la pediatría. Anales de Pediatría es el Órgano de Expresión Científica de la Asociación y constituye el vehículo a través del cual se comunican los asociados. Publica trabajos originales sobre investigación clínica en pediatría procedentes de España y países latinoamericanos, así como artículos de revisión elaborados por los mejores profesionales de cada especialidad, las comunicaciones del congreso anual y los libros de actas de la Asociación, y guías de actuación elaboradas por las diferentes Sociedades/Secciones Especializadas integradas en la Asociación Española de Pediatría.
期刊最新文献
Mielitis transversa y síndrome cauda equino por Streptococcus pyogenes Duración de la lactancia materna y condición nutricional de los lactantes en España. Estudio LAyDI (PAPenRed) Cierre percutáneo versus quirúrgico del ductus arterioso persistente en prematuros de bajo peso: experiencia de 10 años en un centro de tercer nivel Presentación de estudios en congresos y publicación final completa de los mismos en el ámbito de la neonatología española Producción científica tras los congresos de la Sociedad Española de Neonatología de 2017, 2019 y 2021
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1