社区卫生代理对初级卫生保健防治麻风病属性的评估

Natacha Bolorino, Laís Cristina Gonçalves, Franciely Midori Bueno de Freitas, Natalia Marciano de Araujo Ferreira, Vanessa Luquini, Ludmila Barbosa Bandeira Rodrigues, Tissiane Soares Seixas de Mattos, Flávia Meneguetti Pieri
{"title":"社区卫生代理对初级卫生保健防治麻风病属性的评估","authors":"Natacha Bolorino, Laís Cristina Gonçalves, Franciely Midori Bueno de Freitas, Natalia Marciano de Araujo Ferreira, Vanessa Luquini, Ludmila Barbosa Bandeira Rodrigues, Tissiane Soares Seixas de Mattos, Flávia Meneguetti Pieri","doi":"10.17665/1676-4285.20246700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To evaluate whether the attributes of Primary Healthcare are present in leprosy control actions in Londrina from Community Health Workers (CHW) perspectives. Methods: Observational and evaluative study. Data collection took place between January and March 2020 in Londrina, Paraná, using the questionnaire \"Primary Care Assessment Tool (PCATool) - Hansen's disease - CHW version\" and a population-based census of 246 CHWs from 52 Primary Healthcare Units. The analyses used a cutoff point (≥ 6.6), central tendency, and dispersion measures. One-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc tests were used to analyze differences. Results: The general performance towards the primary healthcare attributes were evaluated as strong (mean = 6.95 / SD = 1.08) and the essential score (mean = 7.39 / SD = 1.0). On the other hand, the derived score was evaluated as poor (mean = 6.07 / sd = 1.06). Concerning the Access attribute, the rural zone had a lower score than the urban (mean = 4.47 / SD = 1.63). As for the Comprehensiveness attribute of services provided to leprosy patients, the central region had a lower mean (mean = 4.87 / SD = 3.44) than the south region (mean = 6.76 / SD = 2, 24). Concerning the Integrality, the rural region presented a higher score (mean = 8.15 / SD = 1.22) than the western (mean = 6.16 / SD = 2.91) and central regions (mean = 6.13 / SD = 3.27). As for Community Orientation, the western region had a lower mean than the others (mean = 5.04 / SD = 2.44). The vocational guidance attribute had a higher average in the rural region (mean = 4.14 / SD = 2.62). Final Considerations: The study highlights issues that can be improved, such as first contact access, catalog of services offered to leprosy patients, information provided to the community, professional training, and differences in PHC performance between urban and rural regions.","PeriodicalId":39759,"journal":{"name":"Online Brazilian Journal of Nursing","volume":"85 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation by Community Health Agents of the attributes of Primary Health Care for fighting leprosy\",\"authors\":\"Natacha Bolorino, Laís Cristina Gonçalves, Franciely Midori Bueno de Freitas, Natalia Marciano de Araujo Ferreira, Vanessa Luquini, Ludmila Barbosa Bandeira Rodrigues, Tissiane Soares Seixas de Mattos, Flávia Meneguetti Pieri\",\"doi\":\"10.17665/1676-4285.20246700\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To evaluate whether the attributes of Primary Healthcare are present in leprosy control actions in Londrina from Community Health Workers (CHW) perspectives. Methods: Observational and evaluative study. Data collection took place between January and March 2020 in Londrina, Paraná, using the questionnaire \\\"Primary Care Assessment Tool (PCATool) - Hansen's disease - CHW version\\\" and a population-based census of 246 CHWs from 52 Primary Healthcare Units. The analyses used a cutoff point (≥ 6.6), central tendency, and dispersion measures. One-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc tests were used to analyze differences. Results: The general performance towards the primary healthcare attributes were evaluated as strong (mean = 6.95 / SD = 1.08) and the essential score (mean = 7.39 / SD = 1.0). On the other hand, the derived score was evaluated as poor (mean = 6.07 / sd = 1.06). Concerning the Access attribute, the rural zone had a lower score than the urban (mean = 4.47 / SD = 1.63). As for the Comprehensiveness attribute of services provided to leprosy patients, the central region had a lower mean (mean = 4.87 / SD = 3.44) than the south region (mean = 6.76 / SD = 2, 24). Concerning the Integrality, the rural region presented a higher score (mean = 8.15 / SD = 1.22) than the western (mean = 6.16 / SD = 2.91) and central regions (mean = 6.13 / SD = 3.27). As for Community Orientation, the western region had a lower mean than the others (mean = 5.04 / SD = 2.44). The vocational guidance attribute had a higher average in the rural region (mean = 4.14 / SD = 2.62). Final Considerations: The study highlights issues that can be improved, such as first contact access, catalog of services offered to leprosy patients, information provided to the community, professional training, and differences in PHC performance between urban and rural regions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Online Brazilian Journal of Nursing\",\"volume\":\"85 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Online Brazilian Journal of Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17665/1676-4285.20246700\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Online Brazilian Journal of Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17665/1676-4285.20246700","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的从社区医疗工作者(CHW)的角度评估隆德里纳的麻风病控制行动是否具备初级医疗保健的特征。方法: 观察和评估研究:观察和评估研究。数据收集工作于 2020 年 1 月至 3 月在巴拉那州隆德里纳进行,使用了 "初级保健评估工具(PCATool)--麻风病--社区保健员版本 "问卷,并对来自 52 个初级保健单位的 246 名社区保健员进行了人口普查。分析采用了临界点(≥ 6.6)、中心倾向和离散度量。采用单因素方差分析和 Tukey 后检验来分析差异。结果对初级医疗保健属性的总体表现评价为强(平均 = 6.95 / SD = 1.08),基本得分(平均 = 7.39 / SD = 1.0)。另一方面,衍生得分被评定为差(平均 = 6.07 / SD = 1.06)。在获取属性方面,农村地区的得分低于城市地区(平均 = 4.47 / SD = 1.63)。在为麻风病人提供服务的全面性方面,中部地区的平均值(平均值 = 4.87 / SD = 3.44)低于南部地区(平均值 = 6.76 / SD = 2.24)。在整合性方面,农村地区的得分(平均值 = 8.15 / SD = 1.22)高于西部地区(平均值 = 6.16 / SD = 2.91)和中部地区(平均值 = 6.13 / SD = 3.27)。在社区导向方面,西部地区的平均值低于其他地区(平均值 = 5.04 / SD = 2.44)。农村地区的职业指导属性平均值较高(平均值 = 4.14 / SD = 2.62)。最后的考虑:本研究强调了一些可以改进的问题,如首次接触机会、向麻风病人提供的服务目录、向社区提供的信息、专业培训以及城市和农村地区在初级卫生保健方面的表现差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation by Community Health Agents of the attributes of Primary Health Care for fighting leprosy
Objective: To evaluate whether the attributes of Primary Healthcare are present in leprosy control actions in Londrina from Community Health Workers (CHW) perspectives. Methods: Observational and evaluative study. Data collection took place between January and March 2020 in Londrina, Paraná, using the questionnaire "Primary Care Assessment Tool (PCATool) - Hansen's disease - CHW version" and a population-based census of 246 CHWs from 52 Primary Healthcare Units. The analyses used a cutoff point (≥ 6.6), central tendency, and dispersion measures. One-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc tests were used to analyze differences. Results: The general performance towards the primary healthcare attributes were evaluated as strong (mean = 6.95 / SD = 1.08) and the essential score (mean = 7.39 / SD = 1.0). On the other hand, the derived score was evaluated as poor (mean = 6.07 / sd = 1.06). Concerning the Access attribute, the rural zone had a lower score than the urban (mean = 4.47 / SD = 1.63). As for the Comprehensiveness attribute of services provided to leprosy patients, the central region had a lower mean (mean = 4.87 / SD = 3.44) than the south region (mean = 6.76 / SD = 2, 24). Concerning the Integrality, the rural region presented a higher score (mean = 8.15 / SD = 1.22) than the western (mean = 6.16 / SD = 2.91) and central regions (mean = 6.13 / SD = 3.27). As for Community Orientation, the western region had a lower mean than the others (mean = 5.04 / SD = 2.44). The vocational guidance attribute had a higher average in the rural region (mean = 4.14 / SD = 2.62). Final Considerations: The study highlights issues that can be improved, such as first contact access, catalog of services offered to leprosy patients, information provided to the community, professional training, and differences in PHC performance between urban and rural regions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Online Brazilian Journal of Nursing
Online Brazilian Journal of Nursing Nursing-Nursing (all)
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: Online Braz J Nurs was created in April 23rd, 2002. It is a free scientific and peer-reviewed journal published quarterly (April/August/December). It provides knowledge interchange among Brazilian and international researchers and practitioners in the field of nursing, health, and issues related to these fields. Since April 2004, the OBJN is owned by Professional Master in Nursing Program (http://www.uff.br/mpea ), School of Nursing, Fluminense Federal University, RJ, Brazil. The OBJN joined to the Public Knowledge Project.
期刊最新文献
Cuidados de enfermagem para sangria terapêutica em pessoa idosa: um protocolo de revisão de escopo Qualidade de vida profissional em bombeiros: um protocolo de revisão de escopo Posicionamento de entidades do campo da enfermagem brasileira sobre a ampliação do escopo de práticas Cuidados de transição na assistência circulatória mecânica: experiência para uma prática de enfermagem avançada Interconexão entre saúde planetária e resposta ao HIV/aids: Uma reflexão sob a ótica do pensamento complexo
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1