Vasileios-Menelaos Koufopanos, Pantelis G. Nikolakopoulos
{"title":"有源磁悬浮轴承 - Hiperco 片式转子系统铁损的有限元模拟","authors":"Vasileios-Menelaos Koufopanos, Pantelis G. Nikolakopoulos","doi":"10.1016/j.simpat.2024.102956","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Iron losses appear in Active Magnetic Bearings (AMBs) mostly because of the rotor's movement, but also because of the fluctuation of the control current in the stator's coils. They can be divided into three categories: the hysteresis losses, the eddy current losses and the excess losses and while they depend significantly on the rotating speed and the magnetic flux density applied on the poles, the most contributing factor is the magnetic material used for the core. In this paper, a 2-D Finite Element Method transient model is used to simulate the rotational motion of the shaft inside the AMB and calculate the iron losses that occur due to the alternating magnetic flux inside the rotor, as well as the mechanical load capacity on the vertical direction of the AMB for each case. A simulation is carried out, at first, for a constant control current value and a speed range of 0–30,000 rpm, followed by a second one, for constant rotational speed and control current values 0–0.5 A. Geometry remains the same for all simulations. When it comes to the materials selected for the stator and the rotor, the cases of Hiperco 27, Hiperco 50 and Hiperco 50 HS laminations are tested. The iron losses of the three alloys are compared to the losses of 3 % silicon-iron. The results show that the three iron cobalt alloys have significantly lower losses than the silicon iron for the same AMB size and rotor's speeds. Hiperco 50 has the lowest loss among the three Hiperco alloys, while Hiperco 50 HS provides slightly higher mechanical load capacity under the same operating conditions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49518,"journal":{"name":"Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory","volume":"135 ","pages":"Article 102956"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Finite element simulation of iron losses for an Active Magnetic Bearing–Rotor system constructed of Hiperco laminations\",\"authors\":\"Vasileios-Menelaos Koufopanos, Pantelis G. Nikolakopoulos\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.simpat.2024.102956\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Iron losses appear in Active Magnetic Bearings (AMBs) mostly because of the rotor's movement, but also because of the fluctuation of the control current in the stator's coils. They can be divided into three categories: the hysteresis losses, the eddy current losses and the excess losses and while they depend significantly on the rotating speed and the magnetic flux density applied on the poles, the most contributing factor is the magnetic material used for the core. In this paper, a 2-D Finite Element Method transient model is used to simulate the rotational motion of the shaft inside the AMB and calculate the iron losses that occur due to the alternating magnetic flux inside the rotor, as well as the mechanical load capacity on the vertical direction of the AMB for each case. A simulation is carried out, at first, for a constant control current value and a speed range of 0–30,000 rpm, followed by a second one, for constant rotational speed and control current values 0–0.5 A. Geometry remains the same for all simulations. When it comes to the materials selected for the stator and the rotor, the cases of Hiperco 27, Hiperco 50 and Hiperco 50 HS laminations are tested. The iron losses of the three alloys are compared to the losses of 3 % silicon-iron. The results show that the three iron cobalt alloys have significantly lower losses than the silicon iron for the same AMB size and rotor's speeds. Hiperco 50 has the lowest loss among the three Hiperco alloys, while Hiperco 50 HS provides slightly higher mechanical load capacity under the same operating conditions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory\",\"volume\":\"135 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102956\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569190X24000704\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569190X24000704","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
有源磁悬浮轴承(AMB)中出现铁损的主要原因是转子的运动,但也因为定子线圈中控制电流的波动。它们可分为三类:磁滞损耗、涡流损耗和过剩损耗,虽然它们在很大程度上取决于转速和施加在磁极上的磁通密度,但最主要的影响因素是磁芯所用的磁性材料。本文采用二维有限元法瞬态模型模拟 AMB 内部轴的旋转运动,计算转子内部交变磁通造成的铁损,以及每种情况下 AMB 垂直方向上的机械负载能力。首先对恒定的控制电流值和 0-30,000 rpm 的转速范围进行模拟,然后对恒定的转速和 0-0.5 A 的控制电流值进行模拟。在定子和转子的材料选择方面,对 Hiperco 27、Hiperco 50 和 Hiperco 50 HS 薄片进行了测试。这三种合金的铁损耗与 3% 硅铁的损耗进行了比较。结果表明,在相同的 AMB 尺寸和转子速度下,三种铁钴合金的损耗明显低于硅铁。在三种 Hiperco 合金中,Hiperco 50 的损耗最低,而 Hiperco 50 HS 在相同工作条件下的机械负载能力略高。
Finite element simulation of iron losses for an Active Magnetic Bearing–Rotor system constructed of Hiperco laminations
Iron losses appear in Active Magnetic Bearings (AMBs) mostly because of the rotor's movement, but also because of the fluctuation of the control current in the stator's coils. They can be divided into three categories: the hysteresis losses, the eddy current losses and the excess losses and while they depend significantly on the rotating speed and the magnetic flux density applied on the poles, the most contributing factor is the magnetic material used for the core. In this paper, a 2-D Finite Element Method transient model is used to simulate the rotational motion of the shaft inside the AMB and calculate the iron losses that occur due to the alternating magnetic flux inside the rotor, as well as the mechanical load capacity on the vertical direction of the AMB for each case. A simulation is carried out, at first, for a constant control current value and a speed range of 0–30,000 rpm, followed by a second one, for constant rotational speed and control current values 0–0.5 A. Geometry remains the same for all simulations. When it comes to the materials selected for the stator and the rotor, the cases of Hiperco 27, Hiperco 50 and Hiperco 50 HS laminations are tested. The iron losses of the three alloys are compared to the losses of 3 % silicon-iron. The results show that the three iron cobalt alloys have significantly lower losses than the silicon iron for the same AMB size and rotor's speeds. Hiperco 50 has the lowest loss among the three Hiperco alloys, while Hiperco 50 HS provides slightly higher mechanical load capacity under the same operating conditions.
期刊介绍:
The journal Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory provides a forum for original, high-quality papers dealing with any aspect of systems simulation and modelling.
The journal aims at being a reference and a powerful tool to all those professionally active and/or interested in the methods and applications of simulation. Submitted papers will be peer reviewed and must significantly contribute to modelling and simulation in general or use modelling and simulation in application areas.
Paper submission is solicited on:
• theoretical aspects of modelling and simulation including formal modelling, model-checking, random number generators, sensitivity analysis, variance reduction techniques, experimental design, meta-modelling, methods and algorithms for validation and verification, selection and comparison procedures etc.;
• methodology and application of modelling and simulation in any area, including computer systems, networks, real-time and embedded systems, mobile and intelligent agents, manufacturing and transportation systems, management, engineering, biomedical engineering, economics, ecology and environment, education, transaction handling, etc.;
• simulation languages and environments including those, specific to distributed computing, grid computing, high performance computers or computer networks, etc.;
• distributed and real-time simulation, simulation interoperability;
• tools for high performance computing simulation, including dedicated architectures and parallel computing.