{"title":"将动机教学设计模式应用于脑卒中康复:职业和吞咽治疗可行性研究","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.arrct.2024.100344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To investigate the feasibility of poststroke interventions using a motivational instructional design model with occupational therapy (OT) and swallowing therapy (ST) and the model's potential physical and mental health effects.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>An open-label, single-arm, feasibility study on the Attention, Relevance, Confidence, and Satisfaction model.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Two convalescent rehabilitation wards.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Twenty-five patients with stroke (N=25) (19 men; mean age, 62.4±11.9y; 61.9±36.8d from the first stroke) were recruited.</p></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><p>Twelve participants received a motivational approach based on the Attention, Relevance, Confidence, and Satisfaction model during OT (OT group), and 13 received it during ST (ST group). The intervention lasted 40-60 minutes daily, 5 days weekly, for 4 weeks.</p></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><p>The primary outcomes included the dropout rate, an adverse event, and the participants’ acceptability of the intervention. Paretic arm function was assessed in the OT group; swallowing ability was assessed in the ST group; and activities of daily living, depressive symptoms, and apathy were assessed in both groups.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>No participants dropped out of the intervention or experienced an adverse event. Twenty-one participants (84%) were satisfied with the intervention, and 19 (76%) hoped to continue receiving it. The OT group showed statistically significant improvements in paretic arm function and activities of daily living (Cohen's <em>r</em>=0.68-0.77), whereas the ST group improved in swallowing ability, activities of daily living, and depressive symptoms (Cohen's <em>r</em>=0.62-0.85).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The interventions using the motivational instructional model with OT and ST were feasible and could improve poststroke paretic arm function, swallowing ability, and activities of daily living after stroke.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72291,"journal":{"name":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","volume":"6 3","pages":"Article 100344"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259010952400034X/pdfft?md5=f9644f729d605623ce86b7d6f3667b03&pid=1-s2.0-S259010952400034X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Applying a Motivational Instructional Design Model to Stroke Rehabilitation: A Feasibility Study on Occupational and Swallowing Therapies\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.arrct.2024.100344\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To investigate the feasibility of poststroke interventions using a motivational instructional design model with occupational therapy (OT) and swallowing therapy (ST) and the model's potential physical and mental health effects.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>An open-label, single-arm, feasibility study on the Attention, Relevance, Confidence, and Satisfaction model.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Two convalescent rehabilitation wards.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Twenty-five patients with stroke (N=25) (19 men; mean age, 62.4±11.9y; 61.9±36.8d from the first stroke) were recruited.</p></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><p>Twelve participants received a motivational approach based on the Attention, Relevance, Confidence, and Satisfaction model during OT (OT group), and 13 received it during ST (ST group). The intervention lasted 40-60 minutes daily, 5 days weekly, for 4 weeks.</p></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><p>The primary outcomes included the dropout rate, an adverse event, and the participants’ acceptability of the intervention. Paretic arm function was assessed in the OT group; swallowing ability was assessed in the ST group; and activities of daily living, depressive symptoms, and apathy were assessed in both groups.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>No participants dropped out of the intervention or experienced an adverse event. Twenty-one participants (84%) were satisfied with the intervention, and 19 (76%) hoped to continue receiving it. The OT group showed statistically significant improvements in paretic arm function and activities of daily living (Cohen's <em>r</em>=0.68-0.77), whereas the ST group improved in swallowing ability, activities of daily living, and depressive symptoms (Cohen's <em>r</em>=0.62-0.85).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The interventions using the motivational instructional model with OT and ST were feasible and could improve poststroke paretic arm function, swallowing ability, and activities of daily living after stroke.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72291,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation\",\"volume\":\"6 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100344\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259010952400034X/pdfft?md5=f9644f729d605623ce86b7d6f3667b03&pid=1-s2.0-S259010952400034X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259010952400034X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259010952400034X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要]目的研究脑卒中后使用职业治疗(OT)和吞咽治疗(ST)的动机教学设计模式进行干预的可行性,以及该模式对身心健康的潜在影响。干预12名参与者在OT(OT组)期间接受了基于注意力、相关性、信心和满意度模型的激励方法,13名参与者在ST(ST组)期间接受了基于注意力、相关性、信心和满意度模型的激励方法。主要结果测量主要结果包括辍学率、不良事件和参与者对干预的接受程度。在 OT 组中评估瘫痪手臂的功能;在 ST 组中评估吞咽能力;在两组中评估日常生活活动、抑郁症状和冷漠。21名参与者(84%)对干预表示满意,19名参与者(76%)希望继续接受干预。OT组在瘫痪手臂功能和日常生活活动方面有显著改善(Cohen's r=0.68-0.77),而ST组在吞咽能力、日常生活活动和抑郁症状方面有显著改善(Cohen's r=0.62-0.85)。
Applying a Motivational Instructional Design Model to Stroke Rehabilitation: A Feasibility Study on Occupational and Swallowing Therapies
Objective
To investigate the feasibility of poststroke interventions using a motivational instructional design model with occupational therapy (OT) and swallowing therapy (ST) and the model's potential physical and mental health effects.
Design
An open-label, single-arm, feasibility study on the Attention, Relevance, Confidence, and Satisfaction model.
Setting
Two convalescent rehabilitation wards.
Participants
Twenty-five patients with stroke (N=25) (19 men; mean age, 62.4±11.9y; 61.9±36.8d from the first stroke) were recruited.
Interventions
Twelve participants received a motivational approach based on the Attention, Relevance, Confidence, and Satisfaction model during OT (OT group), and 13 received it during ST (ST group). The intervention lasted 40-60 minutes daily, 5 days weekly, for 4 weeks.
Main Outcome Measures
The primary outcomes included the dropout rate, an adverse event, and the participants’ acceptability of the intervention. Paretic arm function was assessed in the OT group; swallowing ability was assessed in the ST group; and activities of daily living, depressive symptoms, and apathy were assessed in both groups.
Results
No participants dropped out of the intervention or experienced an adverse event. Twenty-one participants (84%) were satisfied with the intervention, and 19 (76%) hoped to continue receiving it. The OT group showed statistically significant improvements in paretic arm function and activities of daily living (Cohen's r=0.68-0.77), whereas the ST group improved in swallowing ability, activities of daily living, and depressive symptoms (Cohen's r=0.62-0.85).
Conclusions
The interventions using the motivational instructional model with OT and ST were feasible and could improve poststroke paretic arm function, swallowing ability, and activities of daily living after stroke.