Jasmijn M. Westerhoff MD , Pim T.S. Borman PhD , Reijer H.A. Rutgers BSc , Bas W. Raaymakers PhD , Neil Winchester MSc , Helena M. Verkooijen PhD , Martin F. Fast PhD
{"title":"磁共振引导放射治疗过程中的患者体验和焦虑","authors":"Jasmijn M. Westerhoff MD , Pim T.S. Borman PhD , Reijer H.A. Rutgers BSc , Bas W. Raaymakers PhD , Neil Winchester MSc , Helena M. Verkooijen PhD , Martin F. Fast PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.adro.2024.101537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To assess patient experience and anxiety during magnetic resonance (MR)–guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) using a hybrid 1.5Tesla (T) MR-guided linear accelerator (MR-Linac) when offered calming video content.</p></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><p>A single-center study was conducted within the Multi-Outcome Evaluation of Radiation Therapy Using the MR-Linac (MOMENTUM) cohort. Patients were offered to watch calming video content on a video monitor during treatment. Questionnaires were used to assess patient experience (MR-Linac patient-reported experience) and anxiety (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, STAI) at first treatment fraction (M1) and at third, fourth, or fifth treatment fraction (M2). Paired <em>t</em> tests were used to test for significant differences, and effect sizes (ESs) were used to estimate the magnitude of the difference.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Between November 2021 and November 2022, 66 patients were included. The majority were men (n = 59, 89%). MRgRT was most frequently delivered to prostate cancer (n = 45, 68%) followed by a lesion in the pancreas (n = 8, 12%). At M1 and M2, 24 of 59 patients (41%) preferred to watch calming video content. One patient was not able to look at the video monitor comfortably at M1. Patient experience was generally favorable or neutral; tingling sensations were reported by 17% of patients. Anxiety levels were high (16%), moderate (18%), or low to none (67%) prior to M1. STAI scores were 33 (SD, 9) prior to M1 and 29 (SD, 7) after M1 (ES, 0.7; <em>P</em> < .001). STAI scores were 32 (SD, 9) prior to M2 and 31 (SD, 8) after M2 (ES, 0.4; <em>P</em> = .009).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Patients were able to comfortably view the video monitor during MRgRT. Consequently, this setup could be used for future applications, such as biofeedback. A sizable minority of patients preferred to watch calming videos that distracted them during treatment. Although the patients’ experience was overall excellent, anxiety was reported. Anxiety levels were highest prior to treatment and decreased after treatment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7390,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","volume":"9 8","pages":"Article 101537"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109424001003/pdfft?md5=607d9c8c23bc2ef27ab2d5ee8d674bb2&pid=1-s2.0-S2452109424001003-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On Patient Experience and Anxiety During Treatment With Magnetic Resonance–Guided Radiation Therapy\",\"authors\":\"Jasmijn M. Westerhoff MD , Pim T.S. Borman PhD , Reijer H.A. Rutgers BSc , Bas W. Raaymakers PhD , Neil Winchester MSc , Helena M. Verkooijen PhD , Martin F. Fast PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.adro.2024.101537\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To assess patient experience and anxiety during magnetic resonance (MR)–guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) using a hybrid 1.5Tesla (T) MR-guided linear accelerator (MR-Linac) when offered calming video content.</p></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><p>A single-center study was conducted within the Multi-Outcome Evaluation of Radiation Therapy Using the MR-Linac (MOMENTUM) cohort. Patients were offered to watch calming video content on a video monitor during treatment. Questionnaires were used to assess patient experience (MR-Linac patient-reported experience) and anxiety (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, STAI) at first treatment fraction (M1) and at third, fourth, or fifth treatment fraction (M2). Paired <em>t</em> tests were used to test for significant differences, and effect sizes (ESs) were used to estimate the magnitude of the difference.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Between November 2021 and November 2022, 66 patients were included. The majority were men (n = 59, 89%). MRgRT was most frequently delivered to prostate cancer (n = 45, 68%) followed by a lesion in the pancreas (n = 8, 12%). At M1 and M2, 24 of 59 patients (41%) preferred to watch calming video content. One patient was not able to look at the video monitor comfortably at M1. Patient experience was generally favorable or neutral; tingling sensations were reported by 17% of patients. Anxiety levels were high (16%), moderate (18%), or low to none (67%) prior to M1. STAI scores were 33 (SD, 9) prior to M1 and 29 (SD, 7) after M1 (ES, 0.7; <em>P</em> < .001). STAI scores were 32 (SD, 9) prior to M2 and 31 (SD, 8) after M2 (ES, 0.4; <em>P</em> = .009).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Patients were able to comfortably view the video monitor during MRgRT. Consequently, this setup could be used for future applications, such as biofeedback. A sizable minority of patients preferred to watch calming videos that distracted them during treatment. Although the patients’ experience was overall excellent, anxiety was reported. Anxiety levels were highest prior to treatment and decreased after treatment.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":\"9 8\",\"pages\":\"Article 101537\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109424001003/pdfft?md5=607d9c8c23bc2ef27ab2d5ee8d674bb2&pid=1-s2.0-S2452109424001003-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109424001003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109424001003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
On Patient Experience and Anxiety During Treatment With Magnetic Resonance–Guided Radiation Therapy
Purpose
To assess patient experience and anxiety during magnetic resonance (MR)–guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) using a hybrid 1.5Tesla (T) MR-guided linear accelerator (MR-Linac) when offered calming video content.
Methods and Materials
A single-center study was conducted within the Multi-Outcome Evaluation of Radiation Therapy Using the MR-Linac (MOMENTUM) cohort. Patients were offered to watch calming video content on a video monitor during treatment. Questionnaires were used to assess patient experience (MR-Linac patient-reported experience) and anxiety (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, STAI) at first treatment fraction (M1) and at third, fourth, or fifth treatment fraction (M2). Paired t tests were used to test for significant differences, and effect sizes (ESs) were used to estimate the magnitude of the difference.
Results
Between November 2021 and November 2022, 66 patients were included. The majority were men (n = 59, 89%). MRgRT was most frequently delivered to prostate cancer (n = 45, 68%) followed by a lesion in the pancreas (n = 8, 12%). At M1 and M2, 24 of 59 patients (41%) preferred to watch calming video content. One patient was not able to look at the video monitor comfortably at M1. Patient experience was generally favorable or neutral; tingling sensations were reported by 17% of patients. Anxiety levels were high (16%), moderate (18%), or low to none (67%) prior to M1. STAI scores were 33 (SD, 9) prior to M1 and 29 (SD, 7) after M1 (ES, 0.7; P < .001). STAI scores were 32 (SD, 9) prior to M2 and 31 (SD, 8) after M2 (ES, 0.4; P = .009).
Conclusions
Patients were able to comfortably view the video monitor during MRgRT. Consequently, this setup could be used for future applications, such as biofeedback. A sizable minority of patients preferred to watch calming videos that distracted them during treatment. Although the patients’ experience was overall excellent, anxiety was reported. Anxiety levels were highest prior to treatment and decreased after treatment.
期刊介绍：
The purpose of Advances is to provide information for clinicians who use radiation therapy by publishing: Clinical trial reports and reanalyses. Basic science original reports. Manuscripts examining health services research, comparative and cost effectiveness research, and systematic reviews. Case reports documenting unusual problems and solutions. High quality multi and single institutional series, as well as other novel retrospective hypothesis generating series. Timely critical reviews on important topics in radiation oncology, such as side effects. Articles reporting the natural history of disease and patterns of failure, particularly as they relate to treatment volume delineation. Articles on safety and quality in radiation therapy. Essays on clinical experience. Articles on practice transformation in radiation oncology, in particular: Aspects of health policy that may impact the future practice of radiation oncology. How information technology, such as data analytics and systems innovations, will change radiation oncology practice. Articles on imaging as they relate to radiation therapy treatment.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
