关于对人类的信任和对人工智能的信任:以新加坡和德国的样本为基础,扩展近期研究的一项研究

Christian Montag , Benjamin Becker , Benjamin J. Li
{"title":"关于对人类的信任和对人工智能的信任:以新加坡和德国的样本为基础,扩展近期研究的一项研究","authors":"Christian Montag ,&nbsp;Benjamin Becker ,&nbsp;Benjamin J. Li","doi":"10.1016/j.chbah.2024.100070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The AI revolution is shaping societies around the world. People interact daily with a growing number of products and services that feature AI integration. Without doubt rapid developments in AI will bring positive outcomes, but also challenges. In this realm it is important to understand if people trust this omni-use technology, because trust represents an essential prerequisite (to be willing) to use AI products and this in turn likely has an impact on how much AI will be embraced by national economies with consequences for the local work forces. To shed more light on trusting AI, the present work aims to understand how much the variables <em>trust in AI</em> and <em>trust in humans</em> overlap. This is important to understand, because much is already known about trust in humans, and if the concepts overlap, much of our understanding of trust in humans might be transferable to trusting AI. In samples from Singapore (n = 535) and Germany (n = 954) we could observe varying degrees of positive relations between the <em>trust in AI/humans</em> variables. Whereas <em>trust in AI/humans</em> showed a small positive association in Germany, there was a moderate positive association in Singapore. Further, this paper revisits associations between individual differences in the Big Five of Personality and general attitudes towards AI including trust.</p><p>The present work shows that <em>trust in humans</em> and <em>trust in AI</em> share only small amounts of variance, but this depends on culture (varying here from about 4 to 11 percent of shared variance). Future research should further investigate such associations but by also considering assessments of trust in specific AI-empowered-products and AI-empowered-services, where things might be different.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100324,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans","volume":"2 2","pages":"Article 100070"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949882124000306/pdfft?md5=79d1e52e0296b5cc72a13b7bfacaaf35&pid=1-s2.0-S2949882124000306-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On trust in humans and trust in artificial intelligence: A study with samples from Singapore and Germany extending recent research\",\"authors\":\"Christian Montag ,&nbsp;Benjamin Becker ,&nbsp;Benjamin J. Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chbah.2024.100070\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The AI revolution is shaping societies around the world. People interact daily with a growing number of products and services that feature AI integration. Without doubt rapid developments in AI will bring positive outcomes, but also challenges. In this realm it is important to understand if people trust this omni-use technology, because trust represents an essential prerequisite (to be willing) to use AI products and this in turn likely has an impact on how much AI will be embraced by national economies with consequences for the local work forces. To shed more light on trusting AI, the present work aims to understand how much the variables <em>trust in AI</em> and <em>trust in humans</em> overlap. This is important to understand, because much is already known about trust in humans, and if the concepts overlap, much of our understanding of trust in humans might be transferable to trusting AI. In samples from Singapore (n = 535) and Germany (n = 954) we could observe varying degrees of positive relations between the <em>trust in AI/humans</em> variables. Whereas <em>trust in AI/humans</em> showed a small positive association in Germany, there was a moderate positive association in Singapore. Further, this paper revisits associations between individual differences in the Big Five of Personality and general attitudes towards AI including trust.</p><p>The present work shows that <em>trust in humans</em> and <em>trust in AI</em> share only small amounts of variance, but this depends on culture (varying here from about 4 to 11 percent of shared variance). Future research should further investigate such associations but by also considering assessments of trust in specific AI-empowered-products and AI-empowered-services, where things might be different.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100324,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans\",\"volume\":\"2 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 100070\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949882124000306/pdfft?md5=79d1e52e0296b5cc72a13b7bfacaaf35&pid=1-s2.0-S2949882124000306-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949882124000306\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949882124000306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人工智能革命正在塑造世界各地的社会。人们每天都在与越来越多集成了人工智能的产品和服务打交道。毫无疑问,人工智能的快速发展将带来积极的成果,但也会带来挑战。在这一领域,重要的是要了解人们是否信任这种全方位使用的技术,因为信任是(愿意)使用人工智能产品的基本前提,而这反过来又可能影响到人工智能在多大程度上被国家经济所接受,并对当地劳动力产生影响。为了进一步阐明对人工智能的信任,本研究旨在了解对人工智能的信任和对人类的信任这两个变量的重叠程度。了解这一点非常重要,因为人们已经对人类的信任有了很多了解,如果这两个概念重叠,我们对人类信任的很多理解可能就会转移到对人工智能的信任上。在新加坡(n = 535)和德国(n = 954)的样本中,我们可以观察到人工智能/人类信任变量之间不同程度的正相关关系。在德国,对人工智能/人类的信任显示出微小的正相关,而在新加坡则显示出中等程度的正相关。此外,本文还重新探讨了五大人格中的个体差异与对人工智能的一般态度(包括信任)之间的关联。目前的研究表明,对人类的信任和对人工智能的信任只存在少量的共同差异,但这取决于文化(共同差异约为 4% 到 11%)。未来的研究应进一步调查这种关联,但也应考虑对特定人工智能产品和人工智能服务的信任评估,因为在这些产品和服务中,情况可能会有所不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
On trust in humans and trust in artificial intelligence: A study with samples from Singapore and Germany extending recent research

The AI revolution is shaping societies around the world. People interact daily with a growing number of products and services that feature AI integration. Without doubt rapid developments in AI will bring positive outcomes, but also challenges. In this realm it is important to understand if people trust this omni-use technology, because trust represents an essential prerequisite (to be willing) to use AI products and this in turn likely has an impact on how much AI will be embraced by national economies with consequences for the local work forces. To shed more light on trusting AI, the present work aims to understand how much the variables trust in AI and trust in humans overlap. This is important to understand, because much is already known about trust in humans, and if the concepts overlap, much of our understanding of trust in humans might be transferable to trusting AI. In samples from Singapore (n = 535) and Germany (n = 954) we could observe varying degrees of positive relations between the trust in AI/humans variables. Whereas trust in AI/humans showed a small positive association in Germany, there was a moderate positive association in Singapore. Further, this paper revisits associations between individual differences in the Big Five of Personality and general attitudes towards AI including trust.

The present work shows that trust in humans and trust in AI share only small amounts of variance, but this depends on culture (varying here from about 4 to 11 percent of shared variance). Future research should further investigate such associations but by also considering assessments of trust in specific AI-empowered-products and AI-empowered-services, where things might be different.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Can ChatGPT read who you are? Understanding young adults’ attitudes towards using AI chatbots for psychotherapy: The role of self-stigma Aversion against machines with complex mental abilities: The role of individual differences Differences between human and artificial/augmented intelligence in medicine Integrating sound effects and background music in Robotic storytelling – A series of online studies across different story genres
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1