{"title":"温室气体披露的实际效果","authors":"Tong Lu , Lijun Ruan , Yanyan Wang , Lisheng Yu","doi":"10.1016/j.cjar.2024.100360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study investigates the valuation and real effects of the mandatory disclosure of greenhouse gas (GHG) emission costs from the perspective of “double materiality.” We consider a firm with a Cobb-Douglas production function that combines GHG-related and non-GHG-related investments to produce short-term and long-term returns. In particular, the GHG-related investment entails short-term and long-term social costs of GHG emissions, including corporate costs and negative externalities. We demonstrate how the mandatory disclosure of the long-term costs of GHG emissions affects capital market valuations and corporate investment decisions relative to a non-disclosure regime. The social welfare in an accounting regime hinges on three parameters: the persistence of the short-term investment return, the ratio of the productivity of GHG-related investment to that of non-GHG-related investment, and the social cost parameter for GHG emissions. Our findings suggest that disclosing the long-term costs of GHG emissions may be detrimental to social welfare. Specifically, the non-disclosure regime results in higher social welfare than the disclosure regime for high values of these parameters.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45688,"journal":{"name":"China Journal of Accounting Research","volume":"17 2","pages":"Article 100360"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755309124000182/pdfft?md5=e61b9fb620d5cdc8b5cf20a771d90077&pid=1-s2.0-S1755309124000182-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real effects of greenhouse gas disclosures\",\"authors\":\"Tong Lu , Lijun Ruan , Yanyan Wang , Lisheng Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cjar.2024.100360\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study investigates the valuation and real effects of the mandatory disclosure of greenhouse gas (GHG) emission costs from the perspective of “double materiality.” We consider a firm with a Cobb-Douglas production function that combines GHG-related and non-GHG-related investments to produce short-term and long-term returns. In particular, the GHG-related investment entails short-term and long-term social costs of GHG emissions, including corporate costs and negative externalities. We demonstrate how the mandatory disclosure of the long-term costs of GHG emissions affects capital market valuations and corporate investment decisions relative to a non-disclosure regime. The social welfare in an accounting regime hinges on three parameters: the persistence of the short-term investment return, the ratio of the productivity of GHG-related investment to that of non-GHG-related investment, and the social cost parameter for GHG emissions. Our findings suggest that disclosing the long-term costs of GHG emissions may be detrimental to social welfare. Specifically, the non-disclosure regime results in higher social welfare than the disclosure regime for high values of these parameters.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45688,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"China Journal of Accounting Research\",\"volume\":\"17 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 100360\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755309124000182/pdfft?md5=e61b9fb620d5cdc8b5cf20a771d90077&pid=1-s2.0-S1755309124000182-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"China Journal of Accounting Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755309124000182\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"China Journal of Accounting Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755309124000182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
This study investigates the valuation and real effects of the mandatory disclosure of greenhouse gas (GHG) emission costs from the perspective of “double materiality.” We consider a firm with a Cobb-Douglas production function that combines GHG-related and non-GHG-related investments to produce short-term and long-term returns. In particular, the GHG-related investment entails short-term and long-term social costs of GHG emissions, including corporate costs and negative externalities. We demonstrate how the mandatory disclosure of the long-term costs of GHG emissions affects capital market valuations and corporate investment decisions relative to a non-disclosure regime. The social welfare in an accounting regime hinges on three parameters: the persistence of the short-term investment return, the ratio of the productivity of GHG-related investment to that of non-GHG-related investment, and the social cost parameter for GHG emissions. Our findings suggest that disclosing the long-term costs of GHG emissions may be detrimental to social welfare. Specifically, the non-disclosure regime results in higher social welfare than the disclosure regime for high values of these parameters.
期刊介绍:
The focus of the China Journal of Accounting Research is to publish theoretical and empirical research papers that use contemporary research methodologies to investigate issues about accounting, corporate finance, auditing and corporate governance in the Greater China region, countries related to the Belt and Road Initiative, and other emerging and developed markets. The Journal encourages the applications of economic and sociological theories to analyze and explain accounting issues within the legal and institutional framework, and to explore accounting issues under different capital markets accurately and succinctly. The published research articles of the Journal will enable scholars to extract relevant issues about accounting, corporate finance, auditing and corporate governance related to the capital markets and institutional environment.