积极主动的境外跨国并购对企业研发有效吗?新兴市场企业的新证据

IF 5.9 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Journal of International Management Pub Date : 2024-05-10 DOI:10.1016/j.intman.2024.101155
Xianming Wu , Maoqiong Wang , Victor Cui
{"title":"积极主动的境外跨国并购对企业研发有效吗?新兴市场企业的新证据","authors":"Xianming Wu ,&nbsp;Maoqiong Wang ,&nbsp;Victor Cui","doi":"10.1016/j.intman.2024.101155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>As emerging market enterprises (EMEs) shift from passive foreign capital acquisition to proactive “going global” strategies, do their outbound cross-border mergers and acquisitions (M&amp;As) stimulate innovation? By analyzing China's M&amp;A data from 2007 to 2020, we explore firms' total R&amp;D, exploitative R&amp;D, and exploratory R&amp;D. Employing difference-in-differences (DID) and propensity score matching (PSM) methodologies, our findings indicate that, compared to inbound cross-border M&amp;As, proactive outbound cross-border M&amp;As promote firms' exploitative R&amp;D but inhibit total and exploratory R&amp;D. EMEs engaged in outbound and inbound cross-border M&amp;As exhibit distinct R&amp;D orientations. The effects of outbound cross-border M&amp;As on firms' R&amp;D are moderated differently by government subsidies and the intensity of regional intellectual property protection. Further analysis underscores the advantages of participating in cross-border M&amp;As (firms as acquirers and targets) over domestic M&amp;As. Moreover, outbound cross-border M&amp;As increase firms' substantial innovation outputs. Our study further proves that what drives the results is not solely the international dimension of M&amp;As; proactive engagement in outbound cross-border M&amp;As holds greater significance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47937,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Management","volume":"30 4","pages":"Article 101155"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are proactive outbound cross-border mergers and acquisitions effective for firms' R&D? New evidence from emerging market enterprises\",\"authors\":\"Xianming Wu ,&nbsp;Maoqiong Wang ,&nbsp;Victor Cui\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.intman.2024.101155\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>As emerging market enterprises (EMEs) shift from passive foreign capital acquisition to proactive “going global” strategies, do their outbound cross-border mergers and acquisitions (M&amp;As) stimulate innovation? By analyzing China's M&amp;A data from 2007 to 2020, we explore firms' total R&amp;D, exploitative R&amp;D, and exploratory R&amp;D. Employing difference-in-differences (DID) and propensity score matching (PSM) methodologies, our findings indicate that, compared to inbound cross-border M&amp;As, proactive outbound cross-border M&amp;As promote firms' exploitative R&amp;D but inhibit total and exploratory R&amp;D. EMEs engaged in outbound and inbound cross-border M&amp;As exhibit distinct R&amp;D orientations. The effects of outbound cross-border M&amp;As on firms' R&amp;D are moderated differently by government subsidies and the intensity of regional intellectual property protection. Further analysis underscores the advantages of participating in cross-border M&amp;As (firms as acquirers and targets) over domestic M&amp;As. Moreover, outbound cross-border M&amp;As increase firms' substantial innovation outputs. Our study further proves that what drives the results is not solely the international dimension of M&amp;As; proactive engagement in outbound cross-border M&amp;As holds greater significance.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47937,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of International Management\",\"volume\":\"30 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 101155\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of International Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S107542532400036X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S107542532400036X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着新兴市场企业(EMEs)从被动的外资并购向主动的 "走出去 "战略转变,它们的境外跨国并购(M&As)是否刺激了创新?通过分析中国 2007 年至 2020 年的并购数据,我们探讨了企业的研发总量、开发性研发和探索性研发。利用差分法(DID)和倾向得分匹配法(PSM),我们的研究结果表明,与入境跨境并购相比,主动出境跨境并购促进了企业的开发性研发,但抑制了总研发和探索性研发。参与出境和入境跨境并购的中小企业表现出不同的研发导向。出境跨境并购对企业研发的影响受政府补贴和地区知识产权保护强度的不同影响。进一步的分析强调了参与跨国并购(企业作为收购方和目标)比参与国内并购更有优势。此外,对外跨境并购增加了企业的实质性创新产出。我们的研究进一步证明,推动研究结果的不仅仅是跨国并购的国际层面,主动参与境外跨国并购具有更大的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Are proactive outbound cross-border mergers and acquisitions effective for firms' R&D? New evidence from emerging market enterprises

As emerging market enterprises (EMEs) shift from passive foreign capital acquisition to proactive “going global” strategies, do their outbound cross-border mergers and acquisitions (M&As) stimulate innovation? By analyzing China's M&A data from 2007 to 2020, we explore firms' total R&D, exploitative R&D, and exploratory R&D. Employing difference-in-differences (DID) and propensity score matching (PSM) methodologies, our findings indicate that, compared to inbound cross-border M&As, proactive outbound cross-border M&As promote firms' exploitative R&D but inhibit total and exploratory R&D. EMEs engaged in outbound and inbound cross-border M&As exhibit distinct R&D orientations. The effects of outbound cross-border M&As on firms' R&D are moderated differently by government subsidies and the intensity of regional intellectual property protection. Further analysis underscores the advantages of participating in cross-border M&As (firms as acquirers and targets) over domestic M&As. Moreover, outbound cross-border M&As increase firms' substantial innovation outputs. Our study further proves that what drives the results is not solely the international dimension of M&As; proactive engagement in outbound cross-border M&As holds greater significance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
9.80%
发文量
67
审稿时长
81 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of International Management is devoted to advancing an understanding of issues in the management of global enterprises, global management theory, and practice; and providing theoretical and managerial implications useful for the further development of research. It is designed to serve an audience of academic researchers and educators, as well as business professionals, by publishing both theoretical and empirical research relating to international management and strategy issues. JIM publishes theoretical and empirical research addressing international business strategy, comparative and cross-cultural management, risk management, organizational behavior, and human resource management, among others.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Editorial on Doing business in Africa: Navigating opportunities and challenges in Africa's emerging markets Global strategy evolution, devolution or revolution: Disruptions to globalization and international business introversion When Global is Not Enough: Applying a Paradox Lens to Sustainability Transitions in Interorganizational Systems The joint effects of institutional logic multiplicity and distance on within-MNE CSR performance differences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1