右美托咪定在南印度重症患者中的镇静和血流动力学反应

Arunkumar Muthalu, Arthi Asokan, Vimala Ananthy
{"title":"右美托咪定在南印度重症患者中的镇静和血流动力学反应","authors":"Arunkumar Muthalu, Arthi Asokan, Vimala Ananthy","doi":"10.3126/ajms.v15i5.63114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Dexmedetomidine is a selective alpha-2-adrenoceptor agonist. It exerts both sedative and analgesic effects through mechanisms different from those of other sedatives. The safety and efficacy of dexmedetomidine are altered by various factors.\nAims and Objectives: This study aims at identifying the various factors that will affect the sedative and hemodynamic responses of dexmedetomidine in seriously ill patients.\nMaterials and Methods: A continuous infusion of dexmedetomidine (0.2–0.7 μg/kg/h) was administered to intensive care unit patients who needed sedation. We investigated the safety and effectiveness of administering dexmedetomidine between responders and non-responders over a short (≤24 h) and lengthy (>24 h) period.\nResults: A total of 84 patients were analyzed who received dexmedetomidine. The longest possible duration of dexmedetomidine administration was 24.7 days and 7.8 days, respectively. Compared to the first 24 h, the number of patients who needed more sedatives or analgesics was not increasing beyond that time. In the first 24 h and after the first 24 h, 35 out of 84 patients (41.2%) and 22 out of 84 patients (26.3%), respectively, needed more sedatives; in the first 24 h and after the first 24 h, 22 out of 84 patients (26.0%) and 18 out of 84 patients (21.4%) needed more analgesics.\nConclusion: The safety and effectiveness of dexmedetomidine were similar across the demographic factors in this study. The interindividual variability due to pharmacokinetic parameters can be further studied along with pharmacogenomic factors that may cause the difference in the responses to dexmedetomidine use.","PeriodicalId":8522,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sedative and hemodynamic response of dexmedetomidine in critically ill South Indian population\",\"authors\":\"Arunkumar Muthalu, Arthi Asokan, Vimala Ananthy\",\"doi\":\"10.3126/ajms.v15i5.63114\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Dexmedetomidine is a selective alpha-2-adrenoceptor agonist. It exerts both sedative and analgesic effects through mechanisms different from those of other sedatives. The safety and efficacy of dexmedetomidine are altered by various factors.\\nAims and Objectives: This study aims at identifying the various factors that will affect the sedative and hemodynamic responses of dexmedetomidine in seriously ill patients.\\nMaterials and Methods: A continuous infusion of dexmedetomidine (0.2–0.7 μg/kg/h) was administered to intensive care unit patients who needed sedation. We investigated the safety and effectiveness of administering dexmedetomidine between responders and non-responders over a short (≤24 h) and lengthy (>24 h) period.\\nResults: A total of 84 patients were analyzed who received dexmedetomidine. The longest possible duration of dexmedetomidine administration was 24.7 days and 7.8 days, respectively. Compared to the first 24 h, the number of patients who needed more sedatives or analgesics was not increasing beyond that time. In the first 24 h and after the first 24 h, 35 out of 84 patients (41.2%) and 22 out of 84 patients (26.3%), respectively, needed more sedatives; in the first 24 h and after the first 24 h, 22 out of 84 patients (26.0%) and 18 out of 84 patients (21.4%) needed more analgesics.\\nConclusion: The safety and effectiveness of dexmedetomidine were similar across the demographic factors in this study. The interindividual variability due to pharmacokinetic parameters can be further studied along with pharmacogenomic factors that may cause the difference in the responses to dexmedetomidine use.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3126/ajms.v15i5.63114\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/ajms.v15i5.63114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景介绍右美托咪定是一种选择性α-2-肾上腺素受体激动剂。它通过不同于其他镇静剂的机制发挥镇静和镇痛作用。右美托咪定的安全性和有效性受多种因素影响:本研究旨在确定影响重症患者右美托咪定镇静和血流动力学反应的各种因素:对需要镇静的重症监护室患者持续输注右美托咪定(0.2-0.7 μg/kg/h)。我们研究了在短时间(≤24小时)和长时间(>24小时)内对有反应者和无反应者使用右美托咪定的安全性和有效性:结果:共分析了84名接受右美托咪定治疗的患者。使用右美托咪定的最长时间分别为 24.7 天和 7.8 天。与最初的 24 小时相比,超过 24 小时后需要更多镇静剂或镇痛剂的患者人数没有增加。在最初的24小时和24小时后,84名患者中分别有35名(41.2%)和22名(26.3%)需要更多镇静剂;在最初的24小时和24小时后,84名患者中分别有22名(26.0%)和18名(21.4%)需要更多镇痛剂:结论:在本研究中,右美托咪定的安全性和有效性在不同的人口统计学因素中具有相似性。可以进一步研究药代动力学参数导致的个体间差异,以及可能导致右美托咪定使用反应差异的药物基因组学因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sedative and hemodynamic response of dexmedetomidine in critically ill South Indian population
Background: Dexmedetomidine is a selective alpha-2-adrenoceptor agonist. It exerts both sedative and analgesic effects through mechanisms different from those of other sedatives. The safety and efficacy of dexmedetomidine are altered by various factors. Aims and Objectives: This study aims at identifying the various factors that will affect the sedative and hemodynamic responses of dexmedetomidine in seriously ill patients. Materials and Methods: A continuous infusion of dexmedetomidine (0.2–0.7 μg/kg/h) was administered to intensive care unit patients who needed sedation. We investigated the safety and effectiveness of administering dexmedetomidine between responders and non-responders over a short (≤24 h) and lengthy (>24 h) period. Results: A total of 84 patients were analyzed who received dexmedetomidine. The longest possible duration of dexmedetomidine administration was 24.7 days and 7.8 days, respectively. Compared to the first 24 h, the number of patients who needed more sedatives or analgesics was not increasing beyond that time. In the first 24 h and after the first 24 h, 35 out of 84 patients (41.2%) and 22 out of 84 patients (26.3%), respectively, needed more sedatives; in the first 24 h and after the first 24 h, 22 out of 84 patients (26.0%) and 18 out of 84 patients (21.4%) needed more analgesics. Conclusion: The safety and effectiveness of dexmedetomidine were similar across the demographic factors in this study. The interindividual variability due to pharmacokinetic parameters can be further studied along with pharmacogenomic factors that may cause the difference in the responses to dexmedetomidine use.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
A comparative study of efficacy of intravenous dexmedetomidine with perineural dexmedetomidine as adjuvant to ropivacaine in supraclavicular brachial plexus block in upper limb surgery Efficacy and safety of low-dose celecoxib with chemoradiation in locally advanced head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma Comparison between mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intra renal surgery for the management of lower calyceal calculi of size less than 1.5 cm : Our institutional experience A study on clinicoradiological profile of patients with hydropneumothorax in a tertiary care hospital in Eastern India Role of low-dose deflazacort with tamsulosin versus tamsulosin alone for medical expulsive therapy of ureteric stone
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1