{"title":"儿科癌症护理中的基因组测序研究:青少年及其父母的决策、态度和感知效用","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.gim.2024.101168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Professional guidelines recommend engaging adolescents and young adults (AYAs) in medical decision making<span><span> (DM), including whether to undergo genomic sequencing (GS). We explored </span>DM around GS and attitudes after return of GS results among a diverse group of AYAs with cancer and their parents.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We surveyed AYAs with cancer (<em>n</em> = 75) and their parents (<em>n</em><span> = 52) 6 months after receiving GS results through the Texas KidsCanSeq study. We analyzed AYAs’ DM role in GS research enrollment and their satisfaction with that role. We compared AYAs’ and parents’ self-reported understanding of, attitudes toward, and perceived utility of the AYA’s GS results.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>Most AYAs reported equally sharing DM with their parents (55%) or leading DM (36%) about GS research. Compared with their cancer care DM role, 56% of AYAs reported the same level of involvement in GS research DM, whereas 32% were more involved, and 13% were less involved (</span><em>P</em> = .011). AYAs were satisfied (99%) with their DM role regarding GS study participation. AYAs and parents had similar self-reported understanding of, attitudes toward, and perceived utility of the GS results.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our results support engaging AYAs in DM about GS research and provide insights into AYAs’ DM preferences and positive attitudes toward GS.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12717,"journal":{"name":"Genetics in Medicine","volume":"26 8","pages":"Article 101168"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Genomic sequencing research in pediatric cancer care: Decision making, attitudes, and perceived utility among adolescents and young adults and their parents\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gim.2024.101168\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Professional guidelines recommend engaging adolescents and young adults (AYAs) in medical decision making<span><span> (DM), including whether to undergo genomic sequencing (GS). We explored </span>DM around GS and attitudes after return of GS results among a diverse group of AYAs with cancer and their parents.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We surveyed AYAs with cancer (<em>n</em> = 75) and their parents (<em>n</em><span> = 52) 6 months after receiving GS results through the Texas KidsCanSeq study. We analyzed AYAs’ DM role in GS research enrollment and their satisfaction with that role. We compared AYAs’ and parents’ self-reported understanding of, attitudes toward, and perceived utility of the AYA’s GS results.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>Most AYAs reported equally sharing DM with their parents (55%) or leading DM (36%) about GS research. Compared with their cancer care DM role, 56% of AYAs reported the same level of involvement in GS research DM, whereas 32% were more involved, and 13% were less involved (</span><em>P</em> = .011). AYAs were satisfied (99%) with their DM role regarding GS study participation. AYAs and parents had similar self-reported understanding of, attitudes toward, and perceived utility of the GS results.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our results support engaging AYAs in DM about GS research and provide insights into AYAs’ DM preferences and positive attitudes toward GS.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Genetics in Medicine\",\"volume\":\"26 8\",\"pages\":\"Article 101168\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Genetics in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1098360024001023\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genetics in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1098360024001023","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Genomic sequencing research in pediatric cancer care: Decision making, attitudes, and perceived utility among adolescents and young adults and their parents
Purpose
Professional guidelines recommend engaging adolescents and young adults (AYAs) in medical decision making (DM), including whether to undergo genomic sequencing (GS). We explored DM around GS and attitudes after return of GS results among a diverse group of AYAs with cancer and their parents.
Methods
We surveyed AYAs with cancer (n = 75) and their parents (n = 52) 6 months after receiving GS results through the Texas KidsCanSeq study. We analyzed AYAs’ DM role in GS research enrollment and their satisfaction with that role. We compared AYAs’ and parents’ self-reported understanding of, attitudes toward, and perceived utility of the AYA’s GS results.
Results
Most AYAs reported equally sharing DM with their parents (55%) or leading DM (36%) about GS research. Compared with their cancer care DM role, 56% of AYAs reported the same level of involvement in GS research DM, whereas 32% were more involved, and 13% were less involved (P = .011). AYAs were satisfied (99%) with their DM role regarding GS study participation. AYAs and parents had similar self-reported understanding of, attitudes toward, and perceived utility of the GS results.
Conclusion
Our results support engaging AYAs in DM about GS research and provide insights into AYAs’ DM preferences and positive attitudes toward GS.
期刊介绍:
Genetics in Medicine (GIM) is the official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. The journal''s mission is to enhance the knowledge, understanding, and practice of medical genetics and genomics through publications in clinical and laboratory genetics and genomics, including ethical, legal, and social issues as well as public health.
GIM encourages research that combats racism, includes diverse populations and is written by authors from diverse and underrepresented backgrounds.