加拿大大肠癌筛查计划:根据国际癌症研究机构的有组织筛查标准,这些计划的效果如何?

Cindy C Y Law, Li Zhang, A. L. Carvalho, Linda Rabeneck, Alan N. Barkun, Anja Nied-Kutterer, David Armstrong, Clarence K Wong, Diane Lamothe, Donald Macintosh, Catherine Dubé, E. Kilfoil, Jennifer Telford, Nancy N. Baxter, Eshwar Kumar, H. Singh, J. Mcgrath, Laura Coulter, Daniel C Sadowski, Karen Efthimiou, Hendrik DuPlessis, Kelly Bunzeluk, L. Gentile, M. Guertin, B. McCurdy, Michael Kohle, Michael Stewart, Ross Stimpson, S. Antle, Shelley Polos, S. Heitman, Tong Zhu, Simbi Ebenuwah, Judy Kosloski, Melissa Mok, Partha Basu, J. Tinmouth
{"title":"加拿大大肠癌筛查计划:根据国际癌症研究机构的有组织筛查标准,这些计划的效果如何?","authors":"Cindy C Y Law, Li Zhang, A. L. Carvalho, Linda Rabeneck, Alan N. Barkun, Anja Nied-Kutterer, David Armstrong, Clarence K Wong, Diane Lamothe, Donald Macintosh, Catherine Dubé, E. Kilfoil, Jennifer Telford, Nancy N. Baxter, Eshwar Kumar, H. Singh, J. Mcgrath, Laura Coulter, Daniel C Sadowski, Karen Efthimiou, Hendrik DuPlessis, Kelly Bunzeluk, L. Gentile, M. Guertin, B. McCurdy, Michael Kohle, Michael Stewart, Ross Stimpson, S. Antle, Shelley Polos, S. Heitman, Tong Zhu, Simbi Ebenuwah, Judy Kosloski, Melissa Mok, Partha Basu, J. Tinmouth","doi":"10.1093/jcag/gwae015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Canada has one of the highest incidences of colorectal cancer (CRC) worldwide. CRC screening improves CRC outcomes and is cost-effective. This study compares Canadian CRC screening programs using essential elements of an organized screening program outlined by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC).\n \n \n \n We collaborated with the Cancer Screening in 5 continents (CanScreen5) program, an initiative of IARC. Standardized data collection forms were sent to representatives of provincial and territorial CRC screening programs. Twenty-five questions were selected to reflect IARC’s essential elements of an organized screening program. We performed a qualitative analysis of Canada’s CRC screening programs and compared programs within Canada and internationally.\n \n \n \n CRC screening programs exist in 10 provinces and 2 territories. None of the programs in Canada met all the essential criteria of an organized screening program outlined by IARC. Three programs do not send invitations to participate in screening. Among those that do, 4 programs do not include a stool test kit in the invitations. While all provinces met the essential elements for leadership, governance, finance, and access to essential services, there was more heterogeneity in the domains of service delivery as well as information systems and quality assurance.\n \n \n \n There is considerable heterogeneity in the design of CRC screening programs in Canada and worldwide. Programs should strive to meet all the essential IARC criteria for organized screening if local resources allow, such as issuing invitations and implementing systems to track and compare outcomes to maximize screening program quality, effectiveness, and impact.\n","PeriodicalId":508018,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology","volume":"2 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Canadian colorectal cancer screening programs: How do they measure up using the International Agency for Research on Cancer criteria for organized screening?\",\"authors\":\"Cindy C Y Law, Li Zhang, A. L. Carvalho, Linda Rabeneck, Alan N. Barkun, Anja Nied-Kutterer, David Armstrong, Clarence K Wong, Diane Lamothe, Donald Macintosh, Catherine Dubé, E. Kilfoil, Jennifer Telford, Nancy N. Baxter, Eshwar Kumar, H. Singh, J. Mcgrath, Laura Coulter, Daniel C Sadowski, Karen Efthimiou, Hendrik DuPlessis, Kelly Bunzeluk, L. Gentile, M. Guertin, B. McCurdy, Michael Kohle, Michael Stewart, Ross Stimpson, S. Antle, Shelley Polos, S. Heitman, Tong Zhu, Simbi Ebenuwah, Judy Kosloski, Melissa Mok, Partha Basu, J. Tinmouth\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jcag/gwae015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n Canada has one of the highest incidences of colorectal cancer (CRC) worldwide. CRC screening improves CRC outcomes and is cost-effective. This study compares Canadian CRC screening programs using essential elements of an organized screening program outlined by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC).\\n \\n \\n \\n We collaborated with the Cancer Screening in 5 continents (CanScreen5) program, an initiative of IARC. Standardized data collection forms were sent to representatives of provincial and territorial CRC screening programs. Twenty-five questions were selected to reflect IARC’s essential elements of an organized screening program. We performed a qualitative analysis of Canada’s CRC screening programs and compared programs within Canada and internationally.\\n \\n \\n \\n CRC screening programs exist in 10 provinces and 2 territories. None of the programs in Canada met all the essential criteria of an organized screening program outlined by IARC. Three programs do not send invitations to participate in screening. Among those that do, 4 programs do not include a stool test kit in the invitations. While all provinces met the essential elements for leadership, governance, finance, and access to essential services, there was more heterogeneity in the domains of service delivery as well as information systems and quality assurance.\\n \\n \\n \\n There is considerable heterogeneity in the design of CRC screening programs in Canada and worldwide. Programs should strive to meet all the essential IARC criteria for organized screening if local resources allow, such as issuing invitations and implementing systems to track and compare outcomes to maximize screening program quality, effectiveness, and impact.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":508018,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\"2 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jcag/gwae015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jcag/gwae015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

加拿大是全球大肠癌(CRC)发病率最高的国家之一。CRC 筛查可改善 CRC 的治疗效果,而且具有成本效益。本研究采用国际癌症研究机构(IARC)概述的有组织筛查计划的基本要素,对加拿大的 CRC 筛查计划进行了比较。 我们与国际癌症研究机构发起的五大洲癌症筛查(CanScreen5)计划进行了合作。我们向各省和地区的 CRC 筛查项目代表发送了标准化的数据收集表。我们选择了 25 个问题来反映 IARC 提出的有组织筛查计划的基本要素。我们对加拿大的 CRC 筛查计划进行了定性分析,并对加拿大国内和国际上的计划进行了比较。 加拿大有 10 个省和 2 个地区实施了 CRC 筛查计划。加拿大没有任何一项筛查计划符合 IARC 提出的有组织筛查计划的所有基本标准。有三个项目没有发出参加筛查的邀请。在发出邀请的计划中,有 4 个计划的邀请函中不包括粪便检测试剂盒。虽然所有省份都符合领导力、管理、财务和获得基本服务的基本要素,但在提供服务以及信息系统和质量保证等领域存在更多差异。 加拿大和世界范围内的 CRC 筛查项目在设计上存在很大差异。在当地资源允许的情况下,筛查计划应努力满足 IARC 关于有组织筛查的所有基本标准,如发出邀请、实施跟踪和比较结果的系统,以最大限度地提高筛查计划的质量、有效性和影响力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Canadian colorectal cancer screening programs: How do they measure up using the International Agency for Research on Cancer criteria for organized screening?
Canada has one of the highest incidences of colorectal cancer (CRC) worldwide. CRC screening improves CRC outcomes and is cost-effective. This study compares Canadian CRC screening programs using essential elements of an organized screening program outlined by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). We collaborated with the Cancer Screening in 5 continents (CanScreen5) program, an initiative of IARC. Standardized data collection forms were sent to representatives of provincial and territorial CRC screening programs. Twenty-five questions were selected to reflect IARC’s essential elements of an organized screening program. We performed a qualitative analysis of Canada’s CRC screening programs and compared programs within Canada and internationally. CRC screening programs exist in 10 provinces and 2 territories. None of the programs in Canada met all the essential criteria of an organized screening program outlined by IARC. Three programs do not send invitations to participate in screening. Among those that do, 4 programs do not include a stool test kit in the invitations. While all provinces met the essential elements for leadership, governance, finance, and access to essential services, there was more heterogeneity in the domains of service delivery as well as information systems and quality assurance. There is considerable heterogeneity in the design of CRC screening programs in Canada and worldwide. Programs should strive to meet all the essential IARC criteria for organized screening if local resources allow, such as issuing invitations and implementing systems to track and compare outcomes to maximize screening program quality, effectiveness, and impact.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Contemporary epidemiology of hepatocellular carcinoma: understanding risk factors and surveillance strategies Identification and prioritization of patient-centred strategies to enhance IBD-related care for older adults: a modified Delphi approach Rectal varices treated by retrograde transvenous obliteration Canadian colorectal cancer screening programs: How do they measure up using the International Agency for Research on Cancer criteria for organized screening? A78 VALIDITY EVIDENCE FOR OBSERVATIONAL EUS COMPETENCY ASSESSMENT: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1