Shacl4Bib:自定义验证图书馆数据

Péter Király
{"title":"Shacl4Bib:自定义验证图书馆数据","authors":"Péter Király","doi":"arxiv-2405.09177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL) is a formal language for validating\nRDF graphs against a set of conditions. Following this idea and implementing a\nsubset of the language, the Metadata Quality Assessment Framework provides\nShacl4Bib: a mechanism to define SHACL-like rules for data sources in non-RDF\nbased formats, such as XML, CSV and JSON. QA catalogue extends this concept\nfurther to MARC21, UNIMARC and PICA data. The criteria can be defined either\nwith YAML or JSON configuration files or with Java code. Libraries can validate\ntheir data against criteria expressed in a unified language, that improves the\nclarity and the reusability of custom validation processes.","PeriodicalId":501285,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Digital Libraries","volume":"68 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shacl4Bib: custom validation of library data\",\"authors\":\"Péter Király\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2405.09177\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL) is a formal language for validating\\nRDF graphs against a set of conditions. Following this idea and implementing a\\nsubset of the language, the Metadata Quality Assessment Framework provides\\nShacl4Bib: a mechanism to define SHACL-like rules for data sources in non-RDF\\nbased formats, such as XML, CSV and JSON. QA catalogue extends this concept\\nfurther to MARC21, UNIMARC and PICA data. The criteria can be defined either\\nwith YAML or JSON configuration files or with Java code. Libraries can validate\\ntheir data against criteria expressed in a unified language, that improves the\\nclarity and the reusability of custom validation processes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501285,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - CS - Digital Libraries\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - CS - Digital Libraries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2405.09177\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Digital Libraries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2405.09177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

形状约束语言(SHACL)是一种根据一系列条件验证 RDF 图形的正式语言。元数据质量评估框架(Metadata Quality Assessment Framework)遵循这一理念并实现了该语言的子集,提供了 SHACL4Bib:一种为非基于 RDF 格式(如 XML、CSV 和 JSON)的数据源定义类似 SHACL 规则的机制。QA 目录将这一概念进一步扩展到 MARC21、UNIMARC 和 PICA 数据。标准既可以用 YAML 或 JSON 配置文件定义,也可以用 Java 代码定义。图书馆可以根据用统一语言表达的标准验证自己的数据,从而提高了自定义验证流程的清晰度和可重用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Shacl4Bib: custom validation of library data
The Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL) is a formal language for validating RDF graphs against a set of conditions. Following this idea and implementing a subset of the language, the Metadata Quality Assessment Framework provides Shacl4Bib: a mechanism to define SHACL-like rules for data sources in non-RDF based formats, such as XML, CSV and JSON. QA catalogue extends this concept further to MARC21, UNIMARC and PICA data. The criteria can be defined either with YAML or JSON configuration files or with Java code. Libraries can validate their data against criteria expressed in a unified language, that improves the clarity and the reusability of custom validation processes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Publishing Instincts: An Exploration-Exploitation Framework for Studying Academic Publishing Behavior and "Home Venues" Research Citations Building Trust in Wikipedia Evaluating the Linguistic Coverage of OpenAlex: An Assessment of Metadata Accuracy and Completeness Towards understanding evolution of science through language model series Ensuring Adherence to Standards in Experiment-Related Metadata Entered Via Spreadsheets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1