Divyanshu Mishra, Varun Chandramohan, Nikhil Sharma, Mudita Gosain, Nitya Wadhwa, Uma Chandra Mouli Natchu, GARBH-Ini study group, Ashok Khurana, J. Alison Noble, Ramachandran Thiruvengadam, Bapu Koundinya Desiraju, Shinjini Bhatnagar
{"title":"开发基于超声图像的深度学习模型并进行外部验证,利用 Garbh-Ini 队列的数据估计怀孕第二和第三个三个月的胎龄:北印度人群的前瞻性队列研究","authors":"Divyanshu Mishra, Varun Chandramohan, Nikhil Sharma, Mudita Gosain, Nitya Wadhwa, Uma Chandra Mouli Natchu, GARBH-Ini study group, Ashok Khurana, J. Alison Noble, Ramachandran Thiruvengadam, Bapu Koundinya Desiraju, Shinjini Bhatnagar","doi":"10.1101/2024.05.13.24305466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Accurate estimation of gestational age (GA) is essential to plan appropriate antenatal care. Current GA estimation models rely on fetal biometry measurements, which are susceptible to ethnic and pathological variations in fetal growth, especially in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy. In this study, we challenge the current paradigm of estimating GA using fetal biometry, by using ultrasound (US) images and deep learning models which can automatically learn image features associated with GA. We developed deep learning models for GA estimation using US images taken at 18-32 weeks of pregnancy from 2207 participants of Garbh-Ini - a hospital-based prospective cohort of pregnant women in North India. Further, we designed a novel conformal prediction (CP) algorithm to detect and reject images when there is a data distribution shift, preventing erroneous predictions. Our best model, GArbh-Ini Ultrasound image-based Gestational age Estimator (GAUGE), which was trained on US images of the fetal head (9647 images from 2207 participants), had a mean absolute error (MAE) of 2.8 days when evaluated on an internal test dataset (N = 204). GAUGE is 44% and 35% more accurate than the widely used Hadlock and INTERGROWTH-21st biometry-based GA models, respectively on the internal test dataset. For an external test dataset (N = 311), collected retrospectively from The Ultrasound Lab, New Delhi, the same model achieved a MAE of 5.9 days. In addition, we show that GAUGE relies on the finer details in the image instead of the fetal biometry and that this leads to a similar performance across small for gestational age (SGA) and appropriate for gestational age (AGA) groups. The ability of GAUGE to consider image features beyond derived biometry suggests that GAUGE offers a better choice for populations with a high prevalence of fetal growth restriction.","PeriodicalId":501409,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Obstetrics and Gynecology","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and external validation of an ultrasound image-based deep learning model to estimate gestational age in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy using data from Garbh-Ini cohort: a prospective cohort study in North Indian population\",\"authors\":\"Divyanshu Mishra, Varun Chandramohan, Nikhil Sharma, Mudita Gosain, Nitya Wadhwa, Uma Chandra Mouli Natchu, GARBH-Ini study group, Ashok Khurana, J. Alison Noble, Ramachandran Thiruvengadam, Bapu Koundinya Desiraju, Shinjini Bhatnagar\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.05.13.24305466\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Accurate estimation of gestational age (GA) is essential to plan appropriate antenatal care. Current GA estimation models rely on fetal biometry measurements, which are susceptible to ethnic and pathological variations in fetal growth, especially in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy. In this study, we challenge the current paradigm of estimating GA using fetal biometry, by using ultrasound (US) images and deep learning models which can automatically learn image features associated with GA. We developed deep learning models for GA estimation using US images taken at 18-32 weeks of pregnancy from 2207 participants of Garbh-Ini - a hospital-based prospective cohort of pregnant women in North India. Further, we designed a novel conformal prediction (CP) algorithm to detect and reject images when there is a data distribution shift, preventing erroneous predictions. Our best model, GArbh-Ini Ultrasound image-based Gestational age Estimator (GAUGE), which was trained on US images of the fetal head (9647 images from 2207 participants), had a mean absolute error (MAE) of 2.8 days when evaluated on an internal test dataset (N = 204). GAUGE is 44% and 35% more accurate than the widely used Hadlock and INTERGROWTH-21st biometry-based GA models, respectively on the internal test dataset. For an external test dataset (N = 311), collected retrospectively from The Ultrasound Lab, New Delhi, the same model achieved a MAE of 5.9 days. In addition, we show that GAUGE relies on the finer details in the image instead of the fetal biometry and that this leads to a similar performance across small for gestational age (SGA) and appropriate for gestational age (AGA) groups. The ability of GAUGE to consider image features beyond derived biometry suggests that GAUGE offers a better choice for populations with a high prevalence of fetal growth restriction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501409,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Obstetrics and Gynecology\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Obstetrics and Gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.13.24305466\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Obstetrics and Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.13.24305466","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
准确估计胎龄(GA)对于制定适当的产前保健计划至关重要。目前的胎龄估计模型依赖于胎儿生物测量,而胎儿生物测量容易受到胎儿生长的种族和病理变化的影响,尤其是在怀孕的第二和第三个三个月。在这项研究中,我们利用超声波(US)图像和可自动学习与 GA 相关的图像特征的深度学习模型,对目前使用胎儿生物测量来估计 GA 的模式提出了挑战。我们开发了深度学习模型,利用来自印度北部医院前瞻性孕妇队列 Garbh-Ini 的 2207 名参与者在怀孕 18-32 周时拍摄的 US 图像来估计 GA。此外,我们还设计了一种新颖的保形预测(CP)算法,用于在数据分布发生变化时检测和剔除图像,从而避免错误预测。我们的最佳模型--GArbh-Ini 基于超声图像的妊娠年龄估计器(GAUGE)是在胎儿头部的 US 图像(来自 2207 名参与者的 9647 张图像)上训练出来的,在内部测试数据集(N = 204)上进行评估时,其平均绝对误差(MAE)为 2.8 天。在内部测试数据集上,GAUGE 比广泛使用的 Hadlock 和 INTERGROWTH-21st 基于生物测量的 GA 模型的准确率分别高出 44% 和 35%。对于外部测试数据集(N = 311)(由新德里超声实验室回顾性收集),同一模型的 MAE 为 5.9 天。此外,我们还展示了 GAUGE 依靠图像中更精细的细节而不是胎儿生物测量,这使得小胎龄(SGA)和适龄胎龄(AGA)组的性能相似。高分辨胎儿生长受限的发生率较高,而高分辨胎儿生长受限能够考虑衍生生物测量以外的图像特征,这表明高分辨胎儿生长受限是一种更好的选择。
Development and external validation of an ultrasound image-based deep learning model to estimate gestational age in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy using data from Garbh-Ini cohort: a prospective cohort study in North Indian population
Accurate estimation of gestational age (GA) is essential to plan appropriate antenatal care. Current GA estimation models rely on fetal biometry measurements, which are susceptible to ethnic and pathological variations in fetal growth, especially in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy. In this study, we challenge the current paradigm of estimating GA using fetal biometry, by using ultrasound (US) images and deep learning models which can automatically learn image features associated with GA. We developed deep learning models for GA estimation using US images taken at 18-32 weeks of pregnancy from 2207 participants of Garbh-Ini - a hospital-based prospective cohort of pregnant women in North India. Further, we designed a novel conformal prediction (CP) algorithm to detect and reject images when there is a data distribution shift, preventing erroneous predictions. Our best model, GArbh-Ini Ultrasound image-based Gestational age Estimator (GAUGE), which was trained on US images of the fetal head (9647 images from 2207 participants), had a mean absolute error (MAE) of 2.8 days when evaluated on an internal test dataset (N = 204). GAUGE is 44% and 35% more accurate than the widely used Hadlock and INTERGROWTH-21st biometry-based GA models, respectively on the internal test dataset. For an external test dataset (N = 311), collected retrospectively from The Ultrasound Lab, New Delhi, the same model achieved a MAE of 5.9 days. In addition, we show that GAUGE relies on the finer details in the image instead of the fetal biometry and that this leads to a similar performance across small for gestational age (SGA) and appropriate for gestational age (AGA) groups. The ability of GAUGE to consider image features beyond derived biometry suggests that GAUGE offers a better choice for populations with a high prevalence of fetal growth restriction.