开发基于超声图像的深度学习模型并进行外部验证,利用 Garbh-Ini 队列的数据估计怀孕第二和第三个三个月的胎龄:北印度人群的前瞻性队列研究

Divyanshu Mishra, Varun Chandramohan, Nikhil Sharma, Mudita Gosain, Nitya Wadhwa, Uma Chandra Mouli Natchu, GARBH-Ini study group, Ashok Khurana, J. Alison Noble, Ramachandran Thiruvengadam, Bapu Koundinya Desiraju, Shinjini Bhatnagar
{"title":"开发基于超声图像的深度学习模型并进行外部验证,利用 Garbh-Ini 队列的数据估计怀孕第二和第三个三个月的胎龄:北印度人群的前瞻性队列研究","authors":"Divyanshu Mishra, Varun Chandramohan, Nikhil Sharma, Mudita Gosain, Nitya Wadhwa, Uma Chandra Mouli Natchu, GARBH-Ini study group, Ashok Khurana, J. Alison Noble, Ramachandran Thiruvengadam, Bapu Koundinya Desiraju, Shinjini Bhatnagar","doi":"10.1101/2024.05.13.24305466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Accurate estimation of gestational age (GA) is essential to plan appropriate antenatal care. Current GA estimation models rely on fetal biometry measurements, which are susceptible to ethnic and pathological variations in fetal growth, especially in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy. In this study, we challenge the current paradigm of estimating GA using fetal biometry, by using ultrasound (US) images and deep learning models which can automatically learn image features associated with GA. We developed deep learning models for GA estimation using US images taken at 18-32 weeks of pregnancy from 2207 participants of Garbh-Ini - a hospital-based prospective cohort of pregnant women in North India. Further, we designed a novel conformal prediction (CP) algorithm to detect and reject images when there is a data distribution shift, preventing erroneous predictions. Our best model, GArbh-Ini Ultrasound image-based Gestational age Estimator (GAUGE), which was trained on US images of the fetal head (9647 images from 2207 participants), had a mean absolute error (MAE) of 2.8 days when evaluated on an internal test dataset (N = 204). GAUGE is 44% and 35% more accurate than the widely used Hadlock and INTERGROWTH-21st biometry-based GA models, respectively on the internal test dataset. For an external test dataset (N = 311), collected retrospectively from The Ultrasound Lab, New Delhi, the same model achieved a MAE of 5.9 days. In addition, we show that GAUGE relies on the finer details in the image instead of the fetal biometry and that this leads to a similar performance across small for gestational age (SGA) and appropriate for gestational age (AGA) groups. The ability of GAUGE to consider image features beyond derived biometry suggests that GAUGE offers a better choice for populations with a high prevalence of fetal growth restriction.","PeriodicalId":501409,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Obstetrics and Gynecology","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and external validation of an ultrasound image-based deep learning model to estimate gestational age in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy using data from Garbh-Ini cohort: a prospective cohort study in North Indian population\",\"authors\":\"Divyanshu Mishra, Varun Chandramohan, Nikhil Sharma, Mudita Gosain, Nitya Wadhwa, Uma Chandra Mouli Natchu, GARBH-Ini study group, Ashok Khurana, J. Alison Noble, Ramachandran Thiruvengadam, Bapu Koundinya Desiraju, Shinjini Bhatnagar\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.05.13.24305466\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Accurate estimation of gestational age (GA) is essential to plan appropriate antenatal care. Current GA estimation models rely on fetal biometry measurements, which are susceptible to ethnic and pathological variations in fetal growth, especially in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy. In this study, we challenge the current paradigm of estimating GA using fetal biometry, by using ultrasound (US) images and deep learning models which can automatically learn image features associated with GA. We developed deep learning models for GA estimation using US images taken at 18-32 weeks of pregnancy from 2207 participants of Garbh-Ini - a hospital-based prospective cohort of pregnant women in North India. Further, we designed a novel conformal prediction (CP) algorithm to detect and reject images when there is a data distribution shift, preventing erroneous predictions. Our best model, GArbh-Ini Ultrasound image-based Gestational age Estimator (GAUGE), which was trained on US images of the fetal head (9647 images from 2207 participants), had a mean absolute error (MAE) of 2.8 days when evaluated on an internal test dataset (N = 204). GAUGE is 44% and 35% more accurate than the widely used Hadlock and INTERGROWTH-21st biometry-based GA models, respectively on the internal test dataset. For an external test dataset (N = 311), collected retrospectively from The Ultrasound Lab, New Delhi, the same model achieved a MAE of 5.9 days. In addition, we show that GAUGE relies on the finer details in the image instead of the fetal biometry and that this leads to a similar performance across small for gestational age (SGA) and appropriate for gestational age (AGA) groups. The ability of GAUGE to consider image features beyond derived biometry suggests that GAUGE offers a better choice for populations with a high prevalence of fetal growth restriction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501409,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Obstetrics and Gynecology\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Obstetrics and Gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.13.24305466\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Obstetrics and Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.13.24305466","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

准确估计胎龄(GA)对于制定适当的产前保健计划至关重要。目前的胎龄估计模型依赖于胎儿生物测量,而胎儿生物测量容易受到胎儿生长的种族和病理变化的影响,尤其是在怀孕的第二和第三个三个月。在这项研究中,我们利用超声波(US)图像和可自动学习与 GA 相关的图像特征的深度学习模型,对目前使用胎儿生物测量来估计 GA 的模式提出了挑战。我们开发了深度学习模型,利用来自印度北部医院前瞻性孕妇队列 Garbh-Ini 的 2207 名参与者在怀孕 18-32 周时拍摄的 US 图像来估计 GA。此外,我们还设计了一种新颖的保形预测(CP)算法,用于在数据分布发生变化时检测和剔除图像,从而避免错误预测。我们的最佳模型--GArbh-Ini 基于超声图像的妊娠年龄估计器(GAUGE)是在胎儿头部的 US 图像(来自 2207 名参与者的 9647 张图像)上训练出来的,在内部测试数据集(N = 204)上进行评估时,其平均绝对误差(MAE)为 2.8 天。在内部测试数据集上,GAUGE 比广泛使用的 Hadlock 和 INTERGROWTH-21st 基于生物测量的 GA 模型的准确率分别高出 44% 和 35%。对于外部测试数据集(N = 311)(由新德里超声实验室回顾性收集),同一模型的 MAE 为 5.9 天。此外,我们还展示了 GAUGE 依靠图像中更精细的细节而不是胎儿生物测量,这使得小胎龄(SGA)和适龄胎龄(AGA)组的性能相似。高分辨胎儿生长受限的发生率较高,而高分辨胎儿生长受限能够考虑衍生生物测量以外的图像特征,这表明高分辨胎儿生长受限是一种更好的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development and external validation of an ultrasound image-based deep learning model to estimate gestational age in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy using data from Garbh-Ini cohort: a prospective cohort study in North Indian population
Accurate estimation of gestational age (GA) is essential to plan appropriate antenatal care. Current GA estimation models rely on fetal biometry measurements, which are susceptible to ethnic and pathological variations in fetal growth, especially in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy. In this study, we challenge the current paradigm of estimating GA using fetal biometry, by using ultrasound (US) images and deep learning models which can automatically learn image features associated with GA. We developed deep learning models for GA estimation using US images taken at 18-32 weeks of pregnancy from 2207 participants of Garbh-Ini - a hospital-based prospective cohort of pregnant women in North India. Further, we designed a novel conformal prediction (CP) algorithm to detect and reject images when there is a data distribution shift, preventing erroneous predictions. Our best model, GArbh-Ini Ultrasound image-based Gestational age Estimator (GAUGE), which was trained on US images of the fetal head (9647 images from 2207 participants), had a mean absolute error (MAE) of 2.8 days when evaluated on an internal test dataset (N = 204). GAUGE is 44% and 35% more accurate than the widely used Hadlock and INTERGROWTH-21st biometry-based GA models, respectively on the internal test dataset. For an external test dataset (N = 311), collected retrospectively from The Ultrasound Lab, New Delhi, the same model achieved a MAE of 5.9 days. In addition, we show that GAUGE relies on the finer details in the image instead of the fetal biometry and that this leads to a similar performance across small for gestational age (SGA) and appropriate for gestational age (AGA) groups. The ability of GAUGE to consider image features beyond derived biometry suggests that GAUGE offers a better choice for populations with a high prevalence of fetal growth restriction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Contraceptive Outcomes of the Natural Cycles Birth Control App: A Study of Canadian Women Uptake of Intrauterine Contraception after Medical Management of First Trimester Incomplete Abortion: A Cross-sectional study in central Uganda Impact and factors affecting unplanned out-of-hospital birth on newborns at University Hospital compared to in-hospital born newborns Effectiveness of the modified WHO labour care guide to detect prolonged and obstructed labour among women admitted at publicly funded facilities in rural Mbarara district, Southwestern Uganda: an ambispective cohort study ACVR2A Facilitates Trophoblast Cell Invasion through TCF7/c-JUN Pathway in Pre-eclampsia Progression
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1