Ex ovo omnia - 为什么我们不能通过成像更多地了解卵子质量?

IF 3.1 2区 生物学 Q2 REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY Biology of Reproduction Pub Date : 2024-06-12 DOI:10.1093/biolre/ioae080
Caitlin F Boylan, Keshia M Sambo, Genevieve Neal-Perry, Lynae M Brayboy
{"title":"Ex ovo omnia - 为什么我们不能通过成像更多地了解卵子质量?","authors":"Caitlin F Boylan, Keshia M Sambo, Genevieve Neal-Perry, Lynae M Brayboy","doi":"10.1093/biolre/ioae080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Determining egg quality is the foremost challenge in assisted reproductive technology (ART). Although extensive advances have been made in multiple areas of ART over the last 40 years, oocyte quality assessment tools have not much evolved beyond standard morphological observation. The oocyte not only delivers half of the nuclear genetic material and all of the mitochondrial DNA to an embryo but also provides complete developmental support during embryonic growth. Oocyte mitochondrial numbers far exceed those of any somatic cell, yet little work has been done to evaluate the mitochondrial bioenergetics of an oocyte. Current standard oocyte assessment in in vitro fertilization (IVF) centers include the observation of oocytes and their surrounding cell complex (cumulus cells) via stereomicroscope or inverted microscope, which is largely primitive. Additional oocyte assessments include polar body grading and polarized light meiotic spindle imaging. However, the evidence regarding the aforementioned methods of oocyte quality assessment and IVF outcomes is contradictory and non-reproducible. High-resolution microscopy techniques have also been implemented in animal and human models with promising outcomes. The current era of oocyte imaging continues to evolve with discoveries in artificial intelligence models of oocyte morphology selection albeit at a slow rate. In this review, the past, current, and future oocyte imaging techniques will be examined with the goal of drawing attention to the gap which limits our ability to assess oocytes in real time. The implications of improved oocyte imaging techniques on patients undergoing IVF will be discussed as well as the need to develop point of care oocyte assessment testing in IVF labs.</p>","PeriodicalId":8965,"journal":{"name":"Biology of Reproduction","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11180616/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ex ovo omnia-why don't we know more about egg quality via imaging?\",\"authors\":\"Caitlin F Boylan, Keshia M Sambo, Genevieve Neal-Perry, Lynae M Brayboy\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/biolre/ioae080\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Determining egg quality is the foremost challenge in assisted reproductive technology (ART). Although extensive advances have been made in multiple areas of ART over the last 40 years, oocyte quality assessment tools have not much evolved beyond standard morphological observation. The oocyte not only delivers half of the nuclear genetic material and all of the mitochondrial DNA to an embryo but also provides complete developmental support during embryonic growth. Oocyte mitochondrial numbers far exceed those of any somatic cell, yet little work has been done to evaluate the mitochondrial bioenergetics of an oocyte. Current standard oocyte assessment in in vitro fertilization (IVF) centers include the observation of oocytes and their surrounding cell complex (cumulus cells) via stereomicroscope or inverted microscope, which is largely primitive. Additional oocyte assessments include polar body grading and polarized light meiotic spindle imaging. However, the evidence regarding the aforementioned methods of oocyte quality assessment and IVF outcomes is contradictory and non-reproducible. High-resolution microscopy techniques have also been implemented in animal and human models with promising outcomes. The current era of oocyte imaging continues to evolve with discoveries in artificial intelligence models of oocyte morphology selection albeit at a slow rate. In this review, the past, current, and future oocyte imaging techniques will be examined with the goal of drawing attention to the gap which limits our ability to assess oocytes in real time. The implications of improved oocyte imaging techniques on patients undergoing IVF will be discussed as well as the need to develop point of care oocyte assessment testing in IVF labs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8965,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biology of Reproduction\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11180616/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biology of Reproduction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/biolre/ioae080\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biology of Reproduction","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/biolre/ioae080","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

确定卵子质量是辅助生殖技术(ART)的首要挑战。尽管在过去的四十年中,辅助生殖技术的多个领域都取得了长足的进步,但卵母细胞质量评估工具的发展还远远没有超越标准的形态学观察。卵母细胞不仅能为胚胎提供一半的核遗传物质和全部的线粒体 DNA,还能在胚胎生长过程中提供完整的发育支持。卵母细胞线粒体的数量远远超过任何体细胞,但目前很少有人对卵母细胞线粒体生物能进行评估。目前,体外受精(IVF)中心的标准卵母细胞评估包括通过体视显微镜或倒置显微镜观察卵母细胞及其周围的细胞复合体(积层细胞),这在很大程度上是原始的。其他卵母细胞评估包括极体分级和偏振光减数分裂纺锤体成像。然而,上述卵母细胞质量评估方法和试管婴儿结果的相关证据相互矛盾,且不可再现。高分辨率显微镜技术也已应用于动物和人体模型,并取得了可喜的成果。随着卵母细胞形态选择人工智能模型的发现,当前的卵母细胞成像技术仍在不断发展,尽管发展速度缓慢。在这篇综述中,将对过去、现在和未来的卵母细胞成像技术进行研究,目的是让人们注意到限制我们实时评估卵母细胞能力的差距。本文将讨论改进的卵母细胞成像技术对试管婴儿患者的影响,以及在试管婴儿实验室开发护理点卵母细胞评估测试的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ex ovo omnia-why don't we know more about egg quality via imaging?

Determining egg quality is the foremost challenge in assisted reproductive technology (ART). Although extensive advances have been made in multiple areas of ART over the last 40 years, oocyte quality assessment tools have not much evolved beyond standard morphological observation. The oocyte not only delivers half of the nuclear genetic material and all of the mitochondrial DNA to an embryo but also provides complete developmental support during embryonic growth. Oocyte mitochondrial numbers far exceed those of any somatic cell, yet little work has been done to evaluate the mitochondrial bioenergetics of an oocyte. Current standard oocyte assessment in in vitro fertilization (IVF) centers include the observation of oocytes and their surrounding cell complex (cumulus cells) via stereomicroscope or inverted microscope, which is largely primitive. Additional oocyte assessments include polar body grading and polarized light meiotic spindle imaging. However, the evidence regarding the aforementioned methods of oocyte quality assessment and IVF outcomes is contradictory and non-reproducible. High-resolution microscopy techniques have also been implemented in animal and human models with promising outcomes. The current era of oocyte imaging continues to evolve with discoveries in artificial intelligence models of oocyte morphology selection albeit at a slow rate. In this review, the past, current, and future oocyte imaging techniques will be examined with the goal of drawing attention to the gap which limits our ability to assess oocytes in real time. The implications of improved oocyte imaging techniques on patients undergoing IVF will be discussed as well as the need to develop point of care oocyte assessment testing in IVF labs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biology of Reproduction
Biology of Reproduction 生物-生殖生物学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
214
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Biology of Reproduction (BOR) is the official journal of the Society for the Study of Reproduction and publishes original research on a broad range of topics in the field of reproductive biology, as well as reviews on topics of current importance or controversy. BOR is consistently one of the most highly cited journals publishing original research in the field of reproductive biology.
期刊最新文献
The RNA-binding protein road map of spermatogenesis. Replacing sperm with genotyped haploid androgenetic blastomeres to generate cattle with predetermined paternal genomes. The loss of dNK1/2 and EVT1 cells at the maternal-fetal Interface is associated with recurrent miscarriage. Loss of CCDC188 causes male infertility with defects in the sperm head–neck connection in mice Decoding recurrent pregnancy loss: insights from comparative proteomics studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1