结直肠内镜黏膜下剥离术后出血的风险因素和卡氮磺酸钠的疗效:一项多中心回顾性队列研究。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Digestion Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-22 DOI:10.1159/000539367
Keitaro Takahashi, Takuya Iwama, Kazuyuki Tanaka, Yuki Miyazawa, Shohei Kuroda, Masashi Horiuchi, Seisuke Saito, Momotaro Muto, Aki Sakatani, Katsuyoshi Ando, Nobuhiro Ueno, Shin Kashima, Kentaro Moriichi, Hiroki Tanabe, Toshikatsu Okumura, Mikihiro Fujiya
{"title":"结直肠内镜黏膜下剥离术后出血的风险因素和卡氮磺酸钠的疗效:一项多中心回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Keitaro Takahashi, Takuya Iwama, Kazuyuki Tanaka, Yuki Miyazawa, Shohei Kuroda, Masashi Horiuchi, Seisuke Saito, Momotaro Muto, Aki Sakatani, Katsuyoshi Ando, Nobuhiro Ueno, Shin Kashima, Kentaro Moriichi, Hiroki Tanabe, Toshikatsu Okumura, Mikihiro Fujiya","doi":"10.1159/000539367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Carbazochrome sodium sulfonate (CSS) is a hemostatic agent that reduces capillary permeability and enhances capillary resistance. However, its specific effects on colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) outcomes remain uncertain. This study aimed to assess the risk factors for post-ESD bleeding and the effect of CSS on colorectal ESD outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>First, we retrospectively analyzed the risk factors for post-ESD bleeding using data from 1,315 lesions in 1,223 patients who underwent ESD for superficial colorectal neoplasms at eight institutions. Second, patients were divided into CSS and non-CSS groups using propensity score matching, and their outcomes from colorectal ESD were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The risk factors for post-colorectal ESD bleeding were identified as age of ≥70 years, tumor located in the rectum, tumor size of ≥40 mm, and post-ESD defect unclosure in both univariate and multivariate analyses. The CSS and non-CSS groups each consisted of 423 lesions after propensity score matching. The post-colorectal ESD bleeding rate was 3.5% (15/423) and 3.3% (14/423) in the CSS and non-CSS groups, respectively, indicating no significant differences. Among patients with the high-risk factors for post-ESD bleeding, the administration of CSS also did not demonstrate a significant reduction in the post-ESD bleeding rate compared to the non-CSS group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CSS administration is ineffective in preventing post-colorectal ESD bleeding in both the general population and individuals at a high risk for such bleeding. Our results indicate the necessity to reconsider the application of CSS for preventing post-colorectal ESD bleeding.</p>","PeriodicalId":11315,"journal":{"name":"Digestion","volume":" ","pages":"310-319"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11318496/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk Factors for Post-Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Bleeding and Efficacy of Carbazochrome Sodium Sulfonate: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Keitaro Takahashi, Takuya Iwama, Kazuyuki Tanaka, Yuki Miyazawa, Shohei Kuroda, Masashi Horiuchi, Seisuke Saito, Momotaro Muto, Aki Sakatani, Katsuyoshi Ando, Nobuhiro Ueno, Shin Kashima, Kentaro Moriichi, Hiroki Tanabe, Toshikatsu Okumura, Mikihiro Fujiya\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000539367\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Carbazochrome sodium sulfonate (CSS) is a hemostatic agent that reduces capillary permeability and enhances capillary resistance. However, its specific effects on colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) outcomes remain uncertain. This study aimed to assess the risk factors for post-ESD bleeding and the effect of CSS on colorectal ESD outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>First, we retrospectively analyzed the risk factors for post-ESD bleeding using data from 1,315 lesions in 1,223 patients who underwent ESD for superficial colorectal neoplasms at eight institutions. Second, patients were divided into CSS and non-CSS groups using propensity score matching, and their outcomes from colorectal ESD were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The risk factors for post-colorectal ESD bleeding were identified as age of ≥70 years, tumor located in the rectum, tumor size of ≥40 mm, and post-ESD defect unclosure in both univariate and multivariate analyses. The CSS and non-CSS groups each consisted of 423 lesions after propensity score matching. The post-colorectal ESD bleeding rate was 3.5% (15/423) and 3.3% (14/423) in the CSS and non-CSS groups, respectively, indicating no significant differences. Among patients with the high-risk factors for post-ESD bleeding, the administration of CSS also did not demonstrate a significant reduction in the post-ESD bleeding rate compared to the non-CSS group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CSS administration is ineffective in preventing post-colorectal ESD bleeding in both the general population and individuals at a high risk for such bleeding. Our results indicate the necessity to reconsider the application of CSS for preventing post-colorectal ESD bleeding.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11315,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digestion\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"310-319\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11318496/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digestion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000539367\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000539367","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:卡络磺酸钠(CSS)是一种止血剂,可降低毛细血管通透性并增强毛细血管阻力。然而,它对结肠直肠内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)结果的具体影响仍不确定。本研究旨在评估ESD术后出血的风险因素以及CSS对结直肠ESD结果的影响:方法:首先,我们利用在八家医疗机构接受ESD治疗浅表结直肠肿瘤的1223名患者的1315个病灶的数据,对ESD术后出血的风险因素进行了回顾性分析。其次,采用倾向得分匹配法将患者分为CSS组和非CSS组,并分析他们的结直肠ESD结果:结果:在单变量和多变量分析中,结直肠ESD术后出血的风险因素被确定为年龄≥70岁、肿瘤位于直肠、肿瘤大小≥40毫米以及ESD术后缺损未闭合。经过倾向评分匹配后,CSS组和非CSS组各有423个病灶。CSS组和非CSS组的结肠直肠ESD术后出血率分别为3.5%(15/423)和3.3%(14/423),无明显差异。在具有ESD术后出血高危因素的患者中,与未使用CSS组相比,使用CSS也未能显著降低ESD术后出血率:结论:在普通人群和ESD出血高危人群中,使用CSS无法有效预防结肠直肠ESD后出血。我们的研究结果表明,有必要重新考虑使用 CSS 预防结肠直肠ESD后出血。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Risk Factors for Post-Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Bleeding and Efficacy of Carbazochrome Sodium Sulfonate: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.

Introduction: Carbazochrome sodium sulfonate (CSS) is a hemostatic agent that reduces capillary permeability and enhances capillary resistance. However, its specific effects on colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) outcomes remain uncertain. This study aimed to assess the risk factors for post-ESD bleeding and the effect of CSS on colorectal ESD outcomes.

Methods: First, we retrospectively analyzed the risk factors for post-ESD bleeding using data from 1,315 lesions in 1,223 patients who underwent ESD for superficial colorectal neoplasms at eight institutions. Second, patients were divided into CSS and non-CSS groups using propensity score matching, and their outcomes from colorectal ESD were analyzed.

Results: The risk factors for post-colorectal ESD bleeding were identified as age of ≥70 years, tumor located in the rectum, tumor size of ≥40 mm, and post-ESD defect unclosure in both univariate and multivariate analyses. The CSS and non-CSS groups each consisted of 423 lesions after propensity score matching. The post-colorectal ESD bleeding rate was 3.5% (15/423) and 3.3% (14/423) in the CSS and non-CSS groups, respectively, indicating no significant differences. Among patients with the high-risk factors for post-ESD bleeding, the administration of CSS also did not demonstrate a significant reduction in the post-ESD bleeding rate compared to the non-CSS group.

Conclusion: CSS administration is ineffective in preventing post-colorectal ESD bleeding in both the general population and individuals at a high risk for such bleeding. Our results indicate the necessity to reconsider the application of CSS for preventing post-colorectal ESD bleeding.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Digestion
Digestion 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Digestion'' concentrates on clinical research reports: in addition to editorials and reviews, the journal features sections on Stomach/Esophagus, Bowel, Neuro-Gastroenterology, Liver/Bile, Pancreas, Metabolism/Nutrition and Gastrointestinal Oncology. Papers cover physiology in humans, metabolic studies and clinical work on the etiology, diagnosis, and therapy of human diseases. It is thus especially cut out for gastroenterologists employed in hospitals and outpatient units. Moreover, the journal''s coverage of studies on the metabolism and effects of therapeutic drugs carries considerable value for clinicians and investigators beyond the immediate field of gastroenterology.
期刊最新文献
Estimation of invasion depth of early colorectal cancer using Endoscopic ultrasonography and Magnifying chromoendoscopy: a meta-analysis. Effects of a protease inhibitor camostat mesilate on gut microbial function in patients with irritable bowel syndrome: A pilot randomized placebo-controlled study. Surveillance after endoscopic resection for colorectal tumors: a comprehensive review. DYRK2 regulates epithelial-mesenchymal transition restriction in pancreatic cancer liver metastasis by inhibiting Twist. Endoscopic resection for colorectal tumors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1