Reema Kashif, Biljana Horn, Jordan Milner, Michael Joyce, Mansi Dalal, Jin-Ju Lee, Kevin McNerney, Jessica Cline, John Fort, Paul Castillo, Jorge Galvez, Warren Alperstein, John Ligon, Edward Ziga, David Crawford, Deepak Chellapandian
{"title":"供体类型和移植前免疫抑制对重型再生障碍性贫血儿童和青少年造血干细胞移植结果的影响。","authors":"Reema Kashif, Biljana Horn, Jordan Milner, Michael Joyce, Mansi Dalal, Jin-Ju Lee, Kevin McNerney, Jessica Cline, John Fort, Paul Castillo, Jorge Galvez, Warren Alperstein, John Ligon, Edward Ziga, David Crawford, Deepak Chellapandian","doi":"10.1111/petr.14784","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The goal of this study was to assess the effect of donor type and pre-transplant immunotherapy (IST) on outcomes of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for children and young adults with severe aplastic anemia (SAA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, multi-center study included 52 SAA patients, treated in 5 pediatric transplant programs in Florida, who received HSCT between 2010 and 2020 as the first- or second-line treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age at HSCT for all 52 patients was 15 years (range 1-25). The 3-year overall survival (OS) by donor type were as follows: 95% [95% CI 85.4-99] for matched related donors (MRD) (N = 24), 84% [95% CI 63.5-99] for haploidentical (N = 13), and 71% [95% CI 36-99] for matched unrelated donors (MUD) (N = 7). The 3-year OS was 81% [95% CI 69.7-99] for all patients, 90.5% [95% CI 79.5-99] for non-IST patients (N = 27), and 70% [95% CI 51-99] for IST patients (N = 24) (log-rank p = .04). Survival of haploidentical HSCT (haplo-HSCT) recipients with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) (N = 13) was excellent for both groups: 100% for non-IST patients (N = 3) and 80% for IST patients (N = 10). The 3-year OS for patients with previous IST by donor type in groups where >5 patients were available was 78.8% [95% CI 52.3-99] for haplo-HSCT (N = 10) and 66.7% [95% CI 28.7-99] for MUD (N = 6). Although it appears that patients receiving HSCT ≥6 months after the start of IST had worse survival, the number of patients in each category was small and log-rank was not significant(p = .65).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients receiving MUD and haplo-HSCT with PTCy had similar outcomes, suggesting that haplo-HSCT with PTCy could be included in randomized trials of upfront IST versus alternative donor HSCT.</p>","PeriodicalId":20038,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Transplantation","volume":"28 4","pages":"e14784"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of donor type and pre-transplant immunosuppression on outcomes of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in children and young adults with severe aplastic anemia.\",\"authors\":\"Reema Kashif, Biljana Horn, Jordan Milner, Michael Joyce, Mansi Dalal, Jin-Ju Lee, Kevin McNerney, Jessica Cline, John Fort, Paul Castillo, Jorge Galvez, Warren Alperstein, John Ligon, Edward Ziga, David Crawford, Deepak Chellapandian\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/petr.14784\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The goal of this study was to assess the effect of donor type and pre-transplant immunotherapy (IST) on outcomes of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for children and young adults with severe aplastic anemia (SAA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, multi-center study included 52 SAA patients, treated in 5 pediatric transplant programs in Florida, who received HSCT between 2010 and 2020 as the first- or second-line treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age at HSCT for all 52 patients was 15 years (range 1-25). The 3-year overall survival (OS) by donor type were as follows: 95% [95% CI 85.4-99] for matched related donors (MRD) (N = 24), 84% [95% CI 63.5-99] for haploidentical (N = 13), and 71% [95% CI 36-99] for matched unrelated donors (MUD) (N = 7). The 3-year OS was 81% [95% CI 69.7-99] for all patients, 90.5% [95% CI 79.5-99] for non-IST patients (N = 27), and 70% [95% CI 51-99] for IST patients (N = 24) (log-rank p = .04). Survival of haploidentical HSCT (haplo-HSCT) recipients with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) (N = 13) was excellent for both groups: 100% for non-IST patients (N = 3) and 80% for IST patients (N = 10). The 3-year OS for patients with previous IST by donor type in groups where >5 patients were available was 78.8% [95% CI 52.3-99] for haplo-HSCT (N = 10) and 66.7% [95% CI 28.7-99] for MUD (N = 6). Although it appears that patients receiving HSCT ≥6 months after the start of IST had worse survival, the number of patients in each category was small and log-rank was not significant(p = .65).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients receiving MUD and haplo-HSCT with PTCy had similar outcomes, suggesting that haplo-HSCT with PTCy could be included in randomized trials of upfront IST versus alternative donor HSCT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20038,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Transplantation\",\"volume\":\"28 4\",\"pages\":\"e14784\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/petr.14784\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/petr.14784","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
研究背景本研究旨在评估供体类型和移植前免疫疗法(IST)对重型再生障碍性贫血(SAA)儿童和年轻成人造血干细胞移植(HSCT)结果的影响:这项多中心回顾性研究纳入了佛罗里达州5个儿科移植项目治疗的52名SAA患者,他们在2010年至2020年间接受了造血干细胞移植作为一线或二线治疗:所有52名患者接受造血干细胞移植时的中位年龄为15岁(1-25岁不等)。按捐献者类型分列的3年总生存率(OS)如下95%[95%CI 85.4-99]为匹配的亲缘供体(MRD)(24例),84%[95%CI 63.5-99]为单倍体(13例),71%[95%CI 36-99]为匹配的非亲缘供体(MUD)(7例)。所有患者的 3 年 OS 为 81% [95% CI 69.7-99],非 IST 患者为 90.5% [95% CI 79.5-99](N = 27),IST 患者为 70% [95% CI 51-99](N = 24)(log-rank p = .04)。移植后使用环磷酰胺(PTCy)的单倍体造血干细胞移植(haplo-HSCT)受者(N = 13)的存活率在两组中都非常好:非IST患者为100%(N = 3),IST患者为80%(N = 10)。曾接受过 IST 的患者,在有 >5 例患者的组别中,按供体类型划分,单倍体造血干细胞移植患者的 3 年 OS 为 78.8% [95% CI 52.3-99](N = 10),MUD 患者的 3 年 OS 为 66.7% [95% CI 28.7-99](N = 6)。虽然在IST开始后≥6个月接受造血干细胞移植的患者生存率似乎较低,但每类患者人数较少,对数秩不显著(P = .65):结论:接受MUD和PTCy单倍体造血干细胞移植的患者具有相似的预后,这表明PTCy单倍体造血干细胞移植可纳入前期IST与替代供体造血干细胞移植的随机试验中。
The role of donor type and pre-transplant immunosuppression on outcomes of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in children and young adults with severe aplastic anemia.
Background: The goal of this study was to assess the effect of donor type and pre-transplant immunotherapy (IST) on outcomes of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for children and young adults with severe aplastic anemia (SAA).
Methods: This retrospective, multi-center study included 52 SAA patients, treated in 5 pediatric transplant programs in Florida, who received HSCT between 2010 and 2020 as the first- or second-line treatment.
Results: The median age at HSCT for all 52 patients was 15 years (range 1-25). The 3-year overall survival (OS) by donor type were as follows: 95% [95% CI 85.4-99] for matched related donors (MRD) (N = 24), 84% [95% CI 63.5-99] for haploidentical (N = 13), and 71% [95% CI 36-99] for matched unrelated donors (MUD) (N = 7). The 3-year OS was 81% [95% CI 69.7-99] for all patients, 90.5% [95% CI 79.5-99] for non-IST patients (N = 27), and 70% [95% CI 51-99] for IST patients (N = 24) (log-rank p = .04). Survival of haploidentical HSCT (haplo-HSCT) recipients with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) (N = 13) was excellent for both groups: 100% for non-IST patients (N = 3) and 80% for IST patients (N = 10). The 3-year OS for patients with previous IST by donor type in groups where >5 patients were available was 78.8% [95% CI 52.3-99] for haplo-HSCT (N = 10) and 66.7% [95% CI 28.7-99] for MUD (N = 6). Although it appears that patients receiving HSCT ≥6 months after the start of IST had worse survival, the number of patients in each category was small and log-rank was not significant(p = .65).
Conclusions: Patients receiving MUD and haplo-HSCT with PTCy had similar outcomes, suggesting that haplo-HSCT with PTCy could be included in randomized trials of upfront IST versus alternative donor HSCT.
期刊介绍:
The aim of Pediatric Transplantation is to publish original articles of the highest quality on clinical experience and basic research in transplantation of tissues and solid organs in infants, children and adolescents. The journal seeks to disseminate the latest information widely to all individuals involved in kidney, liver, heart, lung, intestine and stem cell (bone-marrow) transplantation. In addition, the journal publishes focused reviews on topics relevant to pediatric transplantation as well as timely editorial comment on controversial issues.