神经认知障碍的诊断编码。

IF 3 3区 心理学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Clinical Neuropsychologist Pub Date : 2024-05-19 DOI:10.1080/13854046.2024.2345925
Suzan Uysal
{"title":"神经认知障碍的诊断编码。","authors":"Suzan Uysal","doi":"10.1080/13854046.2024.2345925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective</b>: Diagnosis coding is a core clinical competency. A basic understanding of the structure of the <i>International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification</i> (ICD-10-CM), the conventions and rules for diagnosis coding, and what constitutes accurate coding, is fundamental to the clinician's knowledge base. This commentary seeks to provide a practical framework for clinicians to perform accurate diagnosis coding of neurocognitive disorders. <b>Method</b>: This paper: (1) summarizes the structure of the ICD-10-CM, (2) describes the rules and conventions of diagnosis coding for diagnostic categories relevant to neurocognitive disorders, (3) presents clinical examples and pragmatic recommendations to help readers improve their day-to-day use of diagnosis codes, and (4) describes limitations and discrepancies in the diagnosis coding advice for neurocognitive disorders presented within the <i>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Text Revision</i> (DSM-5-TR) and the <i>DSM-5-TR Neurocognitive Disorders Supplement</i>. Its content originates from the ICD-10-CM itself and its companion document, the <i>ICD-10-CM Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting</i>. <b>Conclusion</b>: The ICD-10-CM classification scheme is logically organized and easy to navigate for users who understand its structure and rules. Many neuropsychologists rely on the DSM-5-TR diagnosis coding advice, however that advice is limited with respect to the range of diagnosis codes relevant to neurocognitive disorders and their underlying causes. Relying on the ICD-10-CM directly for diagnosis coding of neurocognitive disorders, rather than the DSM-5-TR or other secondary sources, is therefore preferable and aids clinicians in accurate diagnosis coding.</p>","PeriodicalId":55250,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuropsychologist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnosis coding of neurocognitive disorders.\",\"authors\":\"Suzan Uysal\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13854046.2024.2345925\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective</b>: Diagnosis coding is a core clinical competency. A basic understanding of the structure of the <i>International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification</i> (ICD-10-CM), the conventions and rules for diagnosis coding, and what constitutes accurate coding, is fundamental to the clinician's knowledge base. This commentary seeks to provide a practical framework for clinicians to perform accurate diagnosis coding of neurocognitive disorders. <b>Method</b>: This paper: (1) summarizes the structure of the ICD-10-CM, (2) describes the rules and conventions of diagnosis coding for diagnostic categories relevant to neurocognitive disorders, (3) presents clinical examples and pragmatic recommendations to help readers improve their day-to-day use of diagnosis codes, and (4) describes limitations and discrepancies in the diagnosis coding advice for neurocognitive disorders presented within the <i>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Text Revision</i> (DSM-5-TR) and the <i>DSM-5-TR Neurocognitive Disorders Supplement</i>. Its content originates from the ICD-10-CM itself and its companion document, the <i>ICD-10-CM Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting</i>. <b>Conclusion</b>: The ICD-10-CM classification scheme is logically organized and easy to navigate for users who understand its structure and rules. Many neuropsychologists rely on the DSM-5-TR diagnosis coding advice, however that advice is limited with respect to the range of diagnosis codes relevant to neurocognitive disorders and their underlying causes. Relying on the ICD-10-CM directly for diagnosis coding of neurocognitive disorders, rather than the DSM-5-TR or other secondary sources, is therefore preferable and aids clinicians in accurate diagnosis coding.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Neuropsychologist\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Neuropsychologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2024.2345925\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuropsychologist","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2024.2345925","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:诊断编码是一项核心临床能力。对《国际疾病分类》第十版临床修订版(ICD-10-CM)的结构、诊断编码的惯例和规则以及准确编码的构成要素的基本了解是临床医生知识库的基础。本评论旨在为临床医生提供一个实用的框架,以便对神经认知障碍进行准确的诊断编码。方法:本文(1)概述了 ICD-10-CM 的结构;(2)描述了与神经认知障碍相关的诊断类别的诊断编码规则和惯例;(3)提供了临床实例和实用建议,以帮助读者改进诊断编码的日常使用;(4)描述了《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版文本修订版(DSM-5-TR)和《DSM-5-TR 神经认知障碍补充》中提出的神经认知障碍诊断编码建议的局限性和差异。其内容源自 ICD-10-CM 本身及其配套文件《ICD-10-CM 官方编码和报告指南》。结论对于了解其结构和规则的用户来说,ICD-10-CM 的分类方案组织合理,易于浏览。许多神经心理学家依赖于 DSM-5-TR 诊断编码建议,然而,该建议在与神经认知障碍及其根本原因相关的诊断编码范围方面是有限的。因此,直接依赖 ICD-10-CM 对神经认知障碍进行诊断编码,而不是依赖 DSM-5-TR 或其他次要来源是可取的,有助于临床医生进行准确的诊断编码。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Diagnosis coding of neurocognitive disorders.

Objective: Diagnosis coding is a core clinical competency. A basic understanding of the structure of the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM), the conventions and rules for diagnosis coding, and what constitutes accurate coding, is fundamental to the clinician's knowledge base. This commentary seeks to provide a practical framework for clinicians to perform accurate diagnosis coding of neurocognitive disorders. Method: This paper: (1) summarizes the structure of the ICD-10-CM, (2) describes the rules and conventions of diagnosis coding for diagnostic categories relevant to neurocognitive disorders, (3) presents clinical examples and pragmatic recommendations to help readers improve their day-to-day use of diagnosis codes, and (4) describes limitations and discrepancies in the diagnosis coding advice for neurocognitive disorders presented within the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-5-TR) and the DSM-5-TR Neurocognitive Disorders Supplement. Its content originates from the ICD-10-CM itself and its companion document, the ICD-10-CM Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting. Conclusion: The ICD-10-CM classification scheme is logically organized and easy to navigate for users who understand its structure and rules. Many neuropsychologists rely on the DSM-5-TR diagnosis coding advice, however that advice is limited with respect to the range of diagnosis codes relevant to neurocognitive disorders and their underlying causes. Relying on the ICD-10-CM directly for diagnosis coding of neurocognitive disorders, rather than the DSM-5-TR or other secondary sources, is therefore preferable and aids clinicians in accurate diagnosis coding.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Neuropsychologist
Clinical Neuropsychologist 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
12.80%
发文量
61
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Clinical Neuropsychologist (TCN) serves as the premier forum for (1) state-of-the-art clinically-relevant scientific research, (2) in-depth professional discussions of matters germane to evidence-based practice, and (3) clinical case studies in neuropsychology. Of particular interest are papers that can make definitive statements about a given topic (thereby having implications for the standards of clinical practice) and those with the potential to expand today’s clinical frontiers. Research on all age groups, and on both clinical and normal populations, is considered.
期刊最新文献
Large-scale evidence for the validity of remote MoCA administration among people with cerebellar ataxia. A clinical evaluation program to monitor neurocognitive risk in children and adolescents with sickle cell disease. Correction. Neuropsychology practice guidance for the neuropsychiatric aspects of Long COVID. The role of cognitive reserve and depression on executive function in older adults: A 10-year study from the Wisconsin Registry for Alzheimer's Prevention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1