{"title":"呼吸间隔与时间分辨率之间的关系对自由呼吸腹部磁共振成像图像质量的影响","authors":"Kazuki Oyama, Mariko Kurashina, Fumihito Ichinohe, Akira Yamada, Yoshihiro Kitoh, Hayato Hayashihara, Shuya Fujihara, Marcel D Nickel, Katsuya Maruyama, Yasunari Fujinaga","doi":"10.2463/mrms.mp.2023-0120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate how the relationship between respiratory interval (RI) and temporal resolution (TR) impacts image quality in free-breathing abdominal MRI (FB-aMRI) using golden-angle radial sparse parallel (GRASP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten healthy volunteers (25.9 ± 2.5 years, four women) underwent 2 mins free-breathing fat-suppression T1-weighted imaging using GRASP at RIs of 3 and 5s (RI<sub>3</sub> and RI<sub>5</sub>, respectively) and retrospectively reconstructed at TR of 1.8, 2.9, 4.8, and 7.7s (TR<sub>1.8</sub>, TR<sub>2.9</sub>, TR<sub>4.8</sub>, and TR<sub>7.7</sub>, respectively) in each patient. The standard deviation (SD) under the diaphragm was measured using SD maps showing the discrepancy for each horizontal section at all TRs. Two radiologists evaluated image quality (visualization of the right hepatic vein at the confluence of the inferior vena cava, posterior segment branch of portal vein, pancreas, left kidney, and artifacts) at all TRs using a 5-point scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SD was significantly higher at TR<sub>1.8</sub> compared to TR<sub>4.8</sub> (P < 0.01) and TR<sub>7.7</sub> (P < 0.001), as well as at TR<sub>2.9</sub> compared to TR<sub>7.7</sub> (P < 0.01) for both RIs. The SD between TR<sub>4.8</sub> and TR<sub>7.7</sub> did not differ for both RIs. For all visual assessment metrics, the TR<sub>1.8</sub> scores were significantly lower than the TR<sub>4.8</sub> and TR<sub>7.7</sub> scores for both RIs. The pancreas and left kidney scores at TR<sub>2.9</sub> were significantly lower than those at TR<sub>7.7</sub> (P < 0.05) for RI<sub>5</sub>. Additionally, the left kidney score at TR<sub>1.8</sub> was lower than that at TR<sub>2.9</sub> (P < 0.05) for RI<sub>3</sub>. All scores at TR<sub>2.9</sub>, TR<sub>4.8</sub>, and TR<sub>7.7</sub> were similar for RI<sub>3</sub>, while those at TR<sub>4.8</sub> and TR<sub>7.7</sub> were similar for RI<sub>5</sub>.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prolonging the TRs compared to RIs enhances image quality in FB-aMRI using GRASP.</p>","PeriodicalId":94126,"journal":{"name":"Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of the Relationship between Respiratory Interval and Temporal Resolution on Image Quality in Free-breathing Abdominal MR Imaging.\",\"authors\":\"Kazuki Oyama, Mariko Kurashina, Fumihito Ichinohe, Akira Yamada, Yoshihiro Kitoh, Hayato Hayashihara, Shuya Fujihara, Marcel D Nickel, Katsuya Maruyama, Yasunari Fujinaga\",\"doi\":\"10.2463/mrms.mp.2023-0120\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate how the relationship between respiratory interval (RI) and temporal resolution (TR) impacts image quality in free-breathing abdominal MRI (FB-aMRI) using golden-angle radial sparse parallel (GRASP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten healthy volunteers (25.9 ± 2.5 years, four women) underwent 2 mins free-breathing fat-suppression T1-weighted imaging using GRASP at RIs of 3 and 5s (RI<sub>3</sub> and RI<sub>5</sub>, respectively) and retrospectively reconstructed at TR of 1.8, 2.9, 4.8, and 7.7s (TR<sub>1.8</sub>, TR<sub>2.9</sub>, TR<sub>4.8</sub>, and TR<sub>7.7</sub>, respectively) in each patient. The standard deviation (SD) under the diaphragm was measured using SD maps showing the discrepancy for each horizontal section at all TRs. Two radiologists evaluated image quality (visualization of the right hepatic vein at the confluence of the inferior vena cava, posterior segment branch of portal vein, pancreas, left kidney, and artifacts) at all TRs using a 5-point scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SD was significantly higher at TR<sub>1.8</sub> compared to TR<sub>4.8</sub> (P < 0.01) and TR<sub>7.7</sub> (P < 0.001), as well as at TR<sub>2.9</sub> compared to TR<sub>7.7</sub> (P < 0.01) for both RIs. The SD between TR<sub>4.8</sub> and TR<sub>7.7</sub> did not differ for both RIs. For all visual assessment metrics, the TR<sub>1.8</sub> scores were significantly lower than the TR<sub>4.8</sub> and TR<sub>7.7</sub> scores for both RIs. The pancreas and left kidney scores at TR<sub>2.9</sub> were significantly lower than those at TR<sub>7.7</sub> (P < 0.05) for RI<sub>5</sub>. Additionally, the left kidney score at TR<sub>1.8</sub> was lower than that at TR<sub>2.9</sub> (P < 0.05) for RI<sub>3</sub>. All scores at TR<sub>2.9</sub>, TR<sub>4.8</sub>, and TR<sub>7.7</sub> were similar for RI<sub>3</sub>, while those at TR<sub>4.8</sub> and TR<sub>7.7</sub> were similar for RI<sub>5</sub>.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prolonging the TRs compared to RIs enhances image quality in FB-aMRI using GRASP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2463/mrms.mp.2023-0120\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2463/mrms.mp.2023-0120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effect of the Relationship between Respiratory Interval and Temporal Resolution on Image Quality in Free-breathing Abdominal MR Imaging.
Purpose: To evaluate how the relationship between respiratory interval (RI) and temporal resolution (TR) impacts image quality in free-breathing abdominal MRI (FB-aMRI) using golden-angle radial sparse parallel (GRASP).
Methods: Ten healthy volunteers (25.9 ± 2.5 years, four women) underwent 2 mins free-breathing fat-suppression T1-weighted imaging using GRASP at RIs of 3 and 5s (RI3 and RI5, respectively) and retrospectively reconstructed at TR of 1.8, 2.9, 4.8, and 7.7s (TR1.8, TR2.9, TR4.8, and TR7.7, respectively) in each patient. The standard deviation (SD) under the diaphragm was measured using SD maps showing the discrepancy for each horizontal section at all TRs. Two radiologists evaluated image quality (visualization of the right hepatic vein at the confluence of the inferior vena cava, posterior segment branch of portal vein, pancreas, left kidney, and artifacts) at all TRs using a 5-point scale.
Results: The SD was significantly higher at TR1.8 compared to TR4.8 (P < 0.01) and TR7.7 (P < 0.001), as well as at TR2.9 compared to TR7.7 (P < 0.01) for both RIs. The SD between TR4.8 and TR7.7 did not differ for both RIs. For all visual assessment metrics, the TR1.8 scores were significantly lower than the TR4.8 and TR7.7 scores for both RIs. The pancreas and left kidney scores at TR2.9 were significantly lower than those at TR7.7 (P < 0.05) for RI5. Additionally, the left kidney score at TR1.8 was lower than that at TR2.9 (P < 0.05) for RI3. All scores at TR2.9, TR4.8, and TR7.7 were similar for RI3, while those at TR4.8 and TR7.7 were similar for RI5.
Conclusion: Prolonging the TRs compared to RIs enhances image quality in FB-aMRI using GRASP.