呼吸间隔与时间分辨率之间的关系对自由呼吸腹部磁共振成像图像质量的影响

Kazuki Oyama, Mariko Kurashina, Fumihito Ichinohe, Akira Yamada, Yoshihiro Kitoh, Hayato Hayashihara, Shuya Fujihara, Marcel D Nickel, Katsuya Maruyama, Yasunari Fujinaga
{"title":"呼吸间隔与时间分辨率之间的关系对自由呼吸腹部磁共振成像图像质量的影响","authors":"Kazuki Oyama, Mariko Kurashina, Fumihito Ichinohe, Akira Yamada, Yoshihiro Kitoh, Hayato Hayashihara, Shuya Fujihara, Marcel D Nickel, Katsuya Maruyama, Yasunari Fujinaga","doi":"10.2463/mrms.mp.2023-0120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate how the relationship between respiratory interval (RI) and temporal resolution (TR) impacts image quality in free-breathing abdominal MRI (FB-aMRI) using golden-angle radial sparse parallel (GRASP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten healthy volunteers (25.9 ± 2.5 years, four women) underwent 2 mins free-breathing fat-suppression T1-weighted imaging using GRASP at RIs of 3 and 5s (RI<sub>3</sub> and RI<sub>5</sub>, respectively) and retrospectively reconstructed at TR of 1.8, 2.9, 4.8, and 7.7s (TR<sub>1.8</sub>, TR<sub>2.9</sub>, TR<sub>4.8</sub>, and TR<sub>7.7</sub>, respectively) in each patient. The standard deviation (SD) under the diaphragm was measured using SD maps showing the discrepancy for each horizontal section at all TRs. Two radiologists evaluated image quality (visualization of the right hepatic vein at the confluence of the inferior vena cava, posterior segment branch of portal vein, pancreas, left kidney, and artifacts) at all TRs using a 5-point scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SD was significantly higher at TR<sub>1.8</sub> compared to TR<sub>4.8</sub> (P < 0.01) and TR<sub>7.7</sub> (P < 0.001), as well as at TR<sub>2.9</sub> compared to TR<sub>7.7</sub> (P < 0.01) for both RIs. The SD between TR<sub>4.8</sub> and TR<sub>7.7</sub> did not differ for both RIs. For all visual assessment metrics, the TR<sub>1.8</sub> scores were significantly lower than the TR<sub>4.8</sub> and TR<sub>7.7</sub> scores for both RIs. The pancreas and left kidney scores at TR<sub>2.9</sub> were significantly lower than those at TR<sub>7.7</sub> (P < 0.05) for RI<sub>5</sub>. Additionally, the left kidney score at TR<sub>1.8</sub> was lower than that at TR<sub>2.9</sub> (P < 0.05) for RI<sub>3</sub>. All scores at TR<sub>2.9</sub>, TR<sub>4.8</sub>, and TR<sub>7.7</sub> were similar for RI<sub>3</sub>, while those at TR<sub>4.8</sub> and TR<sub>7.7</sub> were similar for RI<sub>5</sub>.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prolonging the TRs compared to RIs enhances image quality in FB-aMRI using GRASP.</p>","PeriodicalId":94126,"journal":{"name":"Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of the Relationship between Respiratory Interval and Temporal Resolution on Image Quality in Free-breathing Abdominal MR Imaging.\",\"authors\":\"Kazuki Oyama, Mariko Kurashina, Fumihito Ichinohe, Akira Yamada, Yoshihiro Kitoh, Hayato Hayashihara, Shuya Fujihara, Marcel D Nickel, Katsuya Maruyama, Yasunari Fujinaga\",\"doi\":\"10.2463/mrms.mp.2023-0120\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate how the relationship between respiratory interval (RI) and temporal resolution (TR) impacts image quality in free-breathing abdominal MRI (FB-aMRI) using golden-angle radial sparse parallel (GRASP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten healthy volunteers (25.9 ± 2.5 years, four women) underwent 2 mins free-breathing fat-suppression T1-weighted imaging using GRASP at RIs of 3 and 5s (RI<sub>3</sub> and RI<sub>5</sub>, respectively) and retrospectively reconstructed at TR of 1.8, 2.9, 4.8, and 7.7s (TR<sub>1.8</sub>, TR<sub>2.9</sub>, TR<sub>4.8</sub>, and TR<sub>7.7</sub>, respectively) in each patient. The standard deviation (SD) under the diaphragm was measured using SD maps showing the discrepancy for each horizontal section at all TRs. Two radiologists evaluated image quality (visualization of the right hepatic vein at the confluence of the inferior vena cava, posterior segment branch of portal vein, pancreas, left kidney, and artifacts) at all TRs using a 5-point scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SD was significantly higher at TR<sub>1.8</sub> compared to TR<sub>4.8</sub> (P < 0.01) and TR<sub>7.7</sub> (P < 0.001), as well as at TR<sub>2.9</sub> compared to TR<sub>7.7</sub> (P < 0.01) for both RIs. The SD between TR<sub>4.8</sub> and TR<sub>7.7</sub> did not differ for both RIs. For all visual assessment metrics, the TR<sub>1.8</sub> scores were significantly lower than the TR<sub>4.8</sub> and TR<sub>7.7</sub> scores for both RIs. The pancreas and left kidney scores at TR<sub>2.9</sub> were significantly lower than those at TR<sub>7.7</sub> (P < 0.05) for RI<sub>5</sub>. Additionally, the left kidney score at TR<sub>1.8</sub> was lower than that at TR<sub>2.9</sub> (P < 0.05) for RI<sub>3</sub>. All scores at TR<sub>2.9</sub>, TR<sub>4.8</sub>, and TR<sub>7.7</sub> were similar for RI<sub>3</sub>, while those at TR<sub>4.8</sub> and TR<sub>7.7</sub> were similar for RI<sub>5</sub>.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prolonging the TRs compared to RIs enhances image quality in FB-aMRI using GRASP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2463/mrms.mp.2023-0120\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2463/mrms.mp.2023-0120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估呼吸间隔(RI)和时间分辨率(TR)之间的关系如何影响使用黄金角径向稀疏平行(GRASP)的自由呼吸腹部磁共振成像(FB-aMRI)的图像质量:十名健康志愿者(25.9 ± 2.5 岁,四名女性)分别在 3 秒和 5 秒(RI3 和 RI5)的 RI 下使用 GRASP 进行了 2 分钟的自由呼吸脂肪抑制 T1 加权成像,并分别在 1.8、2.9、4.8 和 7.7 秒(TR1.8、TR2.9、TR4.8 和 TR7.7)的 TR 下对每位患者进行了回溯重建。膈下的标准偏差(SD)是通过显示所有 TRs 下每个水平切面差异的 SD 图来测量的。两名放射科医生采用 5 分制对所有 TR 的图像质量(下腔静脉汇合处右肝静脉、门静脉后段分支、胰腺、左肾和伪影的可见度)进行评估:在两个 RI 中,TR1.8 的 SD 明显高于 TR4.8(P 7.7),TR7.7 的 SD 明显低于 TR1.8(P 2.9),TR4.8 和 TR7.7 的 SD 没有差异。在所有视觉评估指标中,两种 RI 的 TR1.8 评分均明显低于 TR4.8 和 TR7.7。TR2.9 的胰腺和左肾得分明显低于 TR7.7 的得分(P.5)。此外,TR1.8 的左肾评分低于 TR2.9 的评分(P 3.RI3在TR2.9、TR4.8和TR7.7时的所有评分相似,而RI5在TR4.8和TR7.7时的评分相似:结论:与 RI 相比,延长 TRs 可提高使用 GRASP 的 FB-aMRI 的图像质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of the Relationship between Respiratory Interval and Temporal Resolution on Image Quality in Free-breathing Abdominal MR Imaging.

Purpose: To evaluate how the relationship between respiratory interval (RI) and temporal resolution (TR) impacts image quality in free-breathing abdominal MRI (FB-aMRI) using golden-angle radial sparse parallel (GRASP).

Methods: Ten healthy volunteers (25.9 ± 2.5 years, four women) underwent 2 mins free-breathing fat-suppression T1-weighted imaging using GRASP at RIs of 3 and 5s (RI3 and RI5, respectively) and retrospectively reconstructed at TR of 1.8, 2.9, 4.8, and 7.7s (TR1.8, TR2.9, TR4.8, and TR7.7, respectively) in each patient. The standard deviation (SD) under the diaphragm was measured using SD maps showing the discrepancy for each horizontal section at all TRs. Two radiologists evaluated image quality (visualization of the right hepatic vein at the confluence of the inferior vena cava, posterior segment branch of portal vein, pancreas, left kidney, and artifacts) at all TRs using a 5-point scale.

Results: The SD was significantly higher at TR1.8 compared to TR4.8 (P < 0.01) and TR7.7 (P < 0.001), as well as at TR2.9 compared to TR7.7 (P < 0.01) for both RIs. The SD between TR4.8 and TR7.7 did not differ for both RIs. For all visual assessment metrics, the TR1.8 scores were significantly lower than the TR4.8 and TR7.7 scores for both RIs. The pancreas and left kidney scores at TR2.9 were significantly lower than those at TR7.7 (P < 0.05) for RI5. Additionally, the left kidney score at TR1.8 was lower than that at TR2.9 (P < 0.05) for RI3. All scores at TR2.9, TR4.8, and TR7.7 were similar for RI3, while those at TR4.8 and TR7.7 were similar for RI5.

Conclusion: Prolonging the TRs compared to RIs enhances image quality in FB-aMRI using GRASP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Computational Design of a Thermal Applicator for Brain Hyperthermia Controlled by Capacitor Positioning in Loop Coils. Implementation of Two-pulse Phase-modulated (TPPM) 1H Decoupling in a Clinical MR Scanner for the Detection of the C1-glycogen Peak in 13C MRS. Microvascular Dysfunction in Patients with Idiopathic Dilated Cardiomyopathy: Quantitative Assessment with Phase Contrast Cine MR Imaging of the Coronary Sinus. High-resolution Diffusion-weighted Imaging of the Prostate Using Multiplexed Sensitivity-encoding: Comparison with the Conventional and Reduced Field-of-view Techniques. Low b-value Diffusion Tensor Imaging to Analyze the Dynamics of Cerebrospinal Fluid: Resolving Intravoxel Pseudorandom Motion into Ordered and Disordered Motions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1