全国法医和验尸官办公室的技术使用情况:来自 2018 年法医和验尸官办公室普查的数据

Liat C. Weinstein , Kelly A. Keyes , Connor Brooks , Micaela A. Ascolese , Hope M. Smiley-McDonald , Jeri D. Ropero-Miller
{"title":"全国法医和验尸官办公室的技术使用情况:来自 2018 年法医和验尸官办公室普查的数据","authors":"Liat C. Weinstein ,&nbsp;Kelly A. Keyes ,&nbsp;Connor Brooks ,&nbsp;Micaela A. Ascolese ,&nbsp;Hope M. Smiley-McDonald ,&nbsp;Jeri D. Ropero-Miller","doi":"10.1016/j.fsisyn.2024.100477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Technology uses among medical examiner and coroner (MEC) offices in the United States are not well characterized, yet technology is essential to job-performing duties. Resources, operational infrastructure, and MECs' policies and procedures that affect technology use should be better understood. MEC offices need access to technologies like internet, case management systems (CMSs), databases, and advanced imaging to perform their basic duties. A current state of the technologies MEC offices use to complete a death investigation is presented by analyzing data from the 2018 Census of Medical Examiner and Coroner Offices. This analysis shows the New England division reported the most internet and CMS access. Many offices reported limited access to, and low participation in, databases for assessing and sharing case data. Offices serving populations &gt;250,000 have more access to the internet, CMSs, databases, and advanced imaging. Although MEC office technology use has improved over time, it is still disparate.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36925,"journal":{"name":"Forensic Science International: Synergy","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100477"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589871X2400024X/pdfft?md5=1093f12553d743ec74d970fa9a4073e0&pid=1-s2.0-S2589871X2400024X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Technology use among the nation’s medical examiner and coroner offices: Data from the 2018 Census of Medical Examiner and Coroner Offices\",\"authors\":\"Liat C. Weinstein ,&nbsp;Kelly A. Keyes ,&nbsp;Connor Brooks ,&nbsp;Micaela A. Ascolese ,&nbsp;Hope M. Smiley-McDonald ,&nbsp;Jeri D. Ropero-Miller\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fsisyn.2024.100477\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Technology uses among medical examiner and coroner (MEC) offices in the United States are not well characterized, yet technology is essential to job-performing duties. Resources, operational infrastructure, and MECs' policies and procedures that affect technology use should be better understood. MEC offices need access to technologies like internet, case management systems (CMSs), databases, and advanced imaging to perform their basic duties. A current state of the technologies MEC offices use to complete a death investigation is presented by analyzing data from the 2018 Census of Medical Examiner and Coroner Offices. This analysis shows the New England division reported the most internet and CMS access. Many offices reported limited access to, and low participation in, databases for assessing and sharing case data. Offices serving populations &gt;250,000 have more access to the internet, CMSs, databases, and advanced imaging. Although MEC office technology use has improved over time, it is still disparate.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36925,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forensic Science International: Synergy\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100477\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589871X2400024X/pdfft?md5=1093f12553d743ec74d970fa9a4073e0&pid=1-s2.0-S2589871X2400024X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forensic Science International: Synergy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589871X2400024X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic Science International: Synergy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589871X2400024X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

美国法医和验尸官(MEC)办公室的技术使用情况并不十分明确,但技术对于履行工作职责至关重要。应该更好地了解影响技术使用的资源、运行基础设施以及 MEC 的政策和程序。市镇选举委员会办公室需要使用互联网、案件管理系统 (CMS)、数据库和高级成像等技术来履行基本职责。通过分析 2018 年医学验尸官和验尸官办公室普查的数据,介绍了医学验尸官和验尸官办公室用于完成死亡调查的技术现状。该分析表明,新英格兰分部报告了最多的互联网和 CMS 访问。许多办公室报告称,对用于评估和共享案件数据的数据库的访问有限,参与度较低。为 25 万人口提供服务的办公室有更多机会使用互联网、内容管理系统、数据库和先进的成像技术。尽管随着时间的推移,市级医疗中心办公室的技术使用情况有所改善,但仍存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Technology use among the nation’s medical examiner and coroner offices: Data from the 2018 Census of Medical Examiner and Coroner Offices

Technology uses among medical examiner and coroner (MEC) offices in the United States are not well characterized, yet technology is essential to job-performing duties. Resources, operational infrastructure, and MECs' policies and procedures that affect technology use should be better understood. MEC offices need access to technologies like internet, case management systems (CMSs), databases, and advanced imaging to perform their basic duties. A current state of the technologies MEC offices use to complete a death investigation is presented by analyzing data from the 2018 Census of Medical Examiner and Coroner Offices. This analysis shows the New England division reported the most internet and CMS access. Many offices reported limited access to, and low participation in, databases for assessing and sharing case data. Offices serving populations >250,000 have more access to the internet, CMSs, databases, and advanced imaging. Although MEC office technology use has improved over time, it is still disparate.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
75
审稿时长
90 days
期刊最新文献
A transdisciplinary integrated approach to improve identification outcomes for decomposed decedents in medicolegal death investigations Manner of death prediction: A machine learning approach to classify suicide and non-suicide using blood metabolomics Digitalisation of forensic expert activity in Ukraine: Organisational and legal framework Impact of harassment and bullying of forensic scientists on work performance, absenteeism, and intention to leave the workplace in the United States Barriers to human remains identification using forensic odontology in resource-constrained settings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1