MIDAS touch:程序模型创新和验证框架

IF 1.7 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES AEM Education and Training Pub Date : 2024-05-19 DOI:10.1002/aet2.10980
Stephanie N. Stapleton MD, Michael Cassara DO, MSEd, Benjamin Roth MD, Christina Matulis MD, Clare Desmond MD, Ambrose H. Wong MD, MSEd, Annemarie Cardell MD, Tiffany Moadel MD, Charles Lei MD, Brendan W. Munzer MD, Hillary Moss MD, Nur Ain Nadir MD, MEdHP
{"title":"MIDAS touch:程序模型创新和验证框架","authors":"Stephanie N. Stapleton MD,&nbsp;Michael Cassara DO, MSEd,&nbsp;Benjamin Roth MD,&nbsp;Christina Matulis MD,&nbsp;Clare Desmond MD,&nbsp;Ambrose H. Wong MD, MSEd,&nbsp;Annemarie Cardell MD,&nbsp;Tiffany Moadel MD,&nbsp;Charles Lei MD,&nbsp;Brendan W. Munzer MD,&nbsp;Hillary Moss MD,&nbsp;Nur Ain Nadir MD, MEdHP","doi":"10.1002/aet2.10980","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Simulation-based procedural practice is crucial to emergency medicine skills training and maintenance. However, many commercial procedural models are either nonexistent or lacking in key elements. Simulationists often create their own novel models with minimal framework for designing, building, and validation. We propose two interlinked frameworks with the goal to systematically build and validate models for the desired educational outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Simulation Academy Research Committee and members with novel model development expertise assembled as the MIDAS (Model Innovation, Development and Assessment for Simulation) working group. This working group focused on improving novel model creation and validation beginning with a preconference workshop at 2023 Society for Academic Emergency Medicine Annual Meeting. The MIDAS group sought to (1) assess the current state of novel model validation and (2) develop frameworks for the broader simulation community to create, improve, and validate procedural models.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>Workshop participants completed 17 surveys for a response rate of 100%. Many simulationists have created models but few have validated them. The most common barriers to validation were lack of standardized guidelines and familiarity with the validation process.</p>\n \n <p>We have combined principles from education and engineering fields into two interlinked frameworks. The first is centered on steps involved with model creation and refinement. The second is a framework for novel model validation processes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications</h3>\n \n <p>These frameworks emphasize development of models through a deliberate, form-follows-function methodology, aimed at ensuring training quality through novel models. Following a blueprint of how to create, test, and improve models can save innovators time and energy, which in turn can yield greater and more plentiful innovation at lower time and financial cost. This guideline allows for more standardized approaches to model creation, thus improving future scholarship on novel models.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":37032,"journal":{"name":"AEM Education and Training","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The MIDAS touch: Frameworks for procedural model innovation and validation\",\"authors\":\"Stephanie N. Stapleton MD,&nbsp;Michael Cassara DO, MSEd,&nbsp;Benjamin Roth MD,&nbsp;Christina Matulis MD,&nbsp;Clare Desmond MD,&nbsp;Ambrose H. Wong MD, MSEd,&nbsp;Annemarie Cardell MD,&nbsp;Tiffany Moadel MD,&nbsp;Charles Lei MD,&nbsp;Brendan W. Munzer MD,&nbsp;Hillary Moss MD,&nbsp;Nur Ain Nadir MD, MEdHP\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/aet2.10980\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Simulation-based procedural practice is crucial to emergency medicine skills training and maintenance. However, many commercial procedural models are either nonexistent or lacking in key elements. Simulationists often create their own novel models with minimal framework for designing, building, and validation. We propose two interlinked frameworks with the goal to systematically build and validate models for the desired educational outcomes.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Simulation Academy Research Committee and members with novel model development expertise assembled as the MIDAS (Model Innovation, Development and Assessment for Simulation) working group. This working group focused on improving novel model creation and validation beginning with a preconference workshop at 2023 Society for Academic Emergency Medicine Annual Meeting. The MIDAS group sought to (1) assess the current state of novel model validation and (2) develop frameworks for the broader simulation community to create, improve, and validate procedural models.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Findings</h3>\\n \\n <p>Workshop participants completed 17 surveys for a response rate of 100%. Many simulationists have created models but few have validated them. The most common barriers to validation were lack of standardized guidelines and familiarity with the validation process.</p>\\n \\n <p>We have combined principles from education and engineering fields into two interlinked frameworks. The first is centered on steps involved with model creation and refinement. The second is a framework for novel model validation processes.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Implications</h3>\\n \\n <p>These frameworks emphasize development of models through a deliberate, form-follows-function methodology, aimed at ensuring training quality through novel models. Following a blueprint of how to create, test, and improve models can save innovators time and energy, which in turn can yield greater and more plentiful innovation at lower time and financial cost. This guideline allows for more standardized approaches to model creation, thus improving future scholarship on novel models.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37032,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AEM Education and Training\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AEM Education and Training\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aet2.10980\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AEM Education and Training","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aet2.10980","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 基于模拟的程序练习对急诊医学技能培训和维持至关重要。然而,许多商业程序模型要么不存在,要么缺乏关键要素。模拟学家们经常自己创建新颖的模型,而设计、构建和验证的框架却少之又少。我们提出了两个相互关联的框架,目的是系统地建立和验证模型,以达到预期的教育效果。 方法模拟学院研究委员会和具有新型模型开发专长的成员组成了 MIDAS(模拟模型创新、开发和评估)工作组。该工作组的工作重点是改进新型模型的创建和验证,首先在 2023 年急诊医学学术年会上举办会前研讨会。MIDAS 工作组旨在:(1)评估新型模型验证的现状;(2)为更广泛的模拟社区制定框架,以创建、改进和验证程序模型。 研究结果 研讨会参与者完成了 17 份调查问卷,回复率为 100%。许多模拟专家创建了模型,但很少有人对其进行验证。验证过程中最常见的障碍是缺乏标准化指南和对验证过程的不熟悉。 我们将教育和工程领域的原则结合起来,形成了两个相互关联的框架。第一个框架以模型创建和完善的步骤为中心。第二个是新模型验证过程的框架。 意义 这些框架强调通过深思熟虑、形式服从功能的方法开发模型,旨在通过新颖的模型确保培训质量。遵循如何创建、测试和改进模型的蓝图可以节省创新者的时间和精力,进而以较低的时间和财务成本实现更多更大的创新。该指南使创建模型的方法更加标准化,从而改进了新型模型的未来学术研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The MIDAS touch: Frameworks for procedural model innovation and validation

Background

Simulation-based procedural practice is crucial to emergency medicine skills training and maintenance. However, many commercial procedural models are either nonexistent or lacking in key elements. Simulationists often create their own novel models with minimal framework for designing, building, and validation. We propose two interlinked frameworks with the goal to systematically build and validate models for the desired educational outcomes.

Methods

Simulation Academy Research Committee and members with novel model development expertise assembled as the MIDAS (Model Innovation, Development and Assessment for Simulation) working group. This working group focused on improving novel model creation and validation beginning with a preconference workshop at 2023 Society for Academic Emergency Medicine Annual Meeting. The MIDAS group sought to (1) assess the current state of novel model validation and (2) develop frameworks for the broader simulation community to create, improve, and validate procedural models.

Findings

Workshop participants completed 17 surveys for a response rate of 100%. Many simulationists have created models but few have validated them. The most common barriers to validation were lack of standardized guidelines and familiarity with the validation process.

We have combined principles from education and engineering fields into two interlinked frameworks. The first is centered on steps involved with model creation and refinement. The second is a framework for novel model validation processes.

Implications

These frameworks emphasize development of models through a deliberate, form-follows-function methodology, aimed at ensuring training quality through novel models. Following a blueprint of how to create, test, and improve models can save innovators time and energy, which in turn can yield greater and more plentiful innovation at lower time and financial cost. This guideline allows for more standardized approaches to model creation, thus improving future scholarship on novel models.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AEM Education and Training
AEM Education and Training Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
22.20%
发文量
89
期刊最新文献
Evaluating ExpandED: Evaluating the effectiveness of a serious game expansion pack in teaching health professional students about interprofessional care Faculty consensus on competitiveness for the new competency-based emergency medicine standardized letter of evaluation Issue Information Development and implementation of just-in-time curricula for on-shift teaching during times of boarding Educator's blueprint: A how-to guide for creating high-quality slides
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1