腰椎手术后,Oswestry 失能指数需要改善多少才能让患者满意?

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Spine Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-21 DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000005044
Jan Hambrecht, Paul Köhli, Erika Chiapparelli, Krizia Amoroso, Jiaqi Zhu, Ranqing Lan, Ali E Guven, Gisberto Evangelisti, Marco D Burkhard, Koki Tsuchiya, Roland Duculan, Jennifer Shue, Andrew A Sama, Frank P Cammisa, Federico P Girardi, Carol A Mancuso, Alexander P Hughes
{"title":"腰椎手术后,Oswestry 失能指数需要改善多少才能让患者满意?","authors":"Jan Hambrecht, Paul Köhli, Erika Chiapparelli, Krizia Amoroso, Jiaqi Zhu, Ranqing Lan, Ali E Guven, Gisberto Evangelisti, Marco D Burkhard, Koki Tsuchiya, Roland Duculan, Jennifer Shue, Andrew A Sama, Frank P Cammisa, Federico P Girardi, Carol A Mancuso, Alexander P Hughes","doi":"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective review of cohort studies.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To clarify the necessary Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) improvement for patient satisfaction 2 years after lumbar surgery.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Evaluating elective lumbar surgery care often involves patient-reported outcomes. While postoperative functional improvement measured by ODI is theoretically linked to satisfaction, conflicting evidence exists regarding this association.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Baseline ODI and 2-year postoperative ODI were assessed. Patient satisfaction, measured on a scale from 1 to 5, with scores ≥4 considered satisfactory, was evaluated. Patients with incomplete follow-up were excluded. Statistical analyses included Mann-Whitney U and multivariable logistic regression adjusted for age, sex, and body mass index. Receiver operating characteristic analysis determined threshold values for ODI improvement and postoperative target ODI indicative of patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 383 patients were included (mean age: 65 ± 10 y, 57% females). ODI improvement was observed in 91% of patients, with 77% reporting satisfaction scores ≥4. Baseline ODI (median: 62, interquartile range: 46-74) improved to a median of 10 (interquartile range: 1-10) 2 years postoperatively. Baseline [odds ratio (OR): 0.98, P = 0.015] and postoperative ODI scores (OR: 0.93, P < 0.001), as well as the difference between them (OR: 1.04, P < 0.001), were significantly associated with patient satisfaction. Improvement of ≥38 ODI points or a relative change of ≥66% was indicative of patient satisfaction, with higher sensitivity (80%) and specificity (82%) for the relative change versus the absolute change (69%, 68%). With a sensitivity of 85% and a specificity of 77%, a postoperative target ODI of ≤24 indicated patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Lower baseline ODI and greater improvements in postoperative ODI are associated with an increased likelihood of patient satisfaction. A relative improvement of ≥66% or achieving a postoperative ODI score of ≤24 were the most indicative thresholds for predicting patient satisfaction, proving more sensitivity and specificity than an absolute change of ≥38 points.</p>","PeriodicalId":22193,"journal":{"name":"Spine","volume":" ","pages":"67-73"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Much Improvement in Oswestry Disability Index is Necessary to Make Your Patient Satisfied After Lumbar Surgery?\",\"authors\":\"Jan Hambrecht, Paul Köhli, Erika Chiapparelli, Krizia Amoroso, Jiaqi Zhu, Ranqing Lan, Ali E Guven, Gisberto Evangelisti, Marco D Burkhard, Koki Tsuchiya, Roland Duculan, Jennifer Shue, Andrew A Sama, Frank P Cammisa, Federico P Girardi, Carol A Mancuso, Alexander P Hughes\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective review of cohort studies.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To clarify the necessary Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) improvement for patient satisfaction 2 years after lumbar surgery.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Evaluating elective lumbar surgery care often involves patient-reported outcomes. While postoperative functional improvement measured by ODI is theoretically linked to satisfaction, conflicting evidence exists regarding this association.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Baseline ODI and 2-year postoperative ODI were assessed. Patient satisfaction, measured on a scale from 1 to 5, with scores ≥4 considered satisfactory, was evaluated. Patients with incomplete follow-up were excluded. Statistical analyses included Mann-Whitney U and multivariable logistic regression adjusted for age, sex, and body mass index. Receiver operating characteristic analysis determined threshold values for ODI improvement and postoperative target ODI indicative of patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 383 patients were included (mean age: 65 ± 10 y, 57% females). ODI improvement was observed in 91% of patients, with 77% reporting satisfaction scores ≥4. Baseline ODI (median: 62, interquartile range: 46-74) improved to a median of 10 (interquartile range: 1-10) 2 years postoperatively. Baseline [odds ratio (OR): 0.98, P = 0.015] and postoperative ODI scores (OR: 0.93, P < 0.001), as well as the difference between them (OR: 1.04, P < 0.001), were significantly associated with patient satisfaction. Improvement of ≥38 ODI points or a relative change of ≥66% was indicative of patient satisfaction, with higher sensitivity (80%) and specificity (82%) for the relative change versus the absolute change (69%, 68%). With a sensitivity of 85% and a specificity of 77%, a postoperative target ODI of ≤24 indicated patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Lower baseline ODI and greater improvements in postoperative ODI are associated with an increased likelihood of patient satisfaction. A relative improvement of ≥66% or achieving a postoperative ODI score of ≤24 were the most indicative thresholds for predicting patient satisfaction, proving more sensitivity and specificity than an absolute change of ≥38 points.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"67-73\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005044\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005044","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究设计回顾性队列研究:明确腰椎手术两年后患者满意度所需的 ODI 改善:背景:评估择期腰椎手术护理通常涉及患者报告结果(PRO)。虽然理论上以 ODI 衡量的术后功能改善与满意度有关,但关于这种关联存在相互矛盾的证据:方法:对基线 ODI 和术后 2 年 ODI 进行评估。对患者满意度进行评估,满意度从1到5分进行测量,得分≥4分为满意。未完成随访的患者被排除在外。统计分析包括 Mann-Whitney-U 和多变量逻辑回归,并对年龄、性别和体重指数进行了调整。接收者操作特征(ROC)分析确定了患者满意度的 ODI 改善阈值和术后目标 ODI:共纳入 383 名患者(平均年龄为 65±10 岁,57% 为女性)。91%的患者ODI有所改善,77%的患者满意度评分≥4分。术后 2 年,基线 ODI(中位数 62,IQR 46-74)改善至中位数 10(IQR 1-10)。基线 ODI 评分(OR 0.98,P=0.015)和术后 ODI 评分(OR 0.93,P=0.015)均有改善:较低的基线 ODI 和较大的术后 ODI 改善与患者满意度增加的可能性相关。相对改善率≥66%或术后ODI评分≤24分是预测患者满意度的最具指示性的阈值,比绝对值变化≥38分更具敏感性和特异性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How Much Improvement in Oswestry Disability Index is Necessary to Make Your Patient Satisfied After Lumbar Surgery?

Study design: Retrospective review of cohort studies.

Objective: To clarify the necessary Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) improvement for patient satisfaction 2 years after lumbar surgery.

Background: Evaluating elective lumbar surgery care often involves patient-reported outcomes. While postoperative functional improvement measured by ODI is theoretically linked to satisfaction, conflicting evidence exists regarding this association.

Material and methods: Baseline ODI and 2-year postoperative ODI were assessed. Patient satisfaction, measured on a scale from 1 to 5, with scores ≥4 considered satisfactory, was evaluated. Patients with incomplete follow-up were excluded. Statistical analyses included Mann-Whitney U and multivariable logistic regression adjusted for age, sex, and body mass index. Receiver operating characteristic analysis determined threshold values for ODI improvement and postoperative target ODI indicative of patient satisfaction.

Results: A total of 383 patients were included (mean age: 65 ± 10 y, 57% females). ODI improvement was observed in 91% of patients, with 77% reporting satisfaction scores ≥4. Baseline ODI (median: 62, interquartile range: 46-74) improved to a median of 10 (interquartile range: 1-10) 2 years postoperatively. Baseline [odds ratio (OR): 0.98, P = 0.015] and postoperative ODI scores (OR: 0.93, P < 0.001), as well as the difference between them (OR: 1.04, P < 0.001), were significantly associated with patient satisfaction. Improvement of ≥38 ODI points or a relative change of ≥66% was indicative of patient satisfaction, with higher sensitivity (80%) and specificity (82%) for the relative change versus the absolute change (69%, 68%). With a sensitivity of 85% and a specificity of 77%, a postoperative target ODI of ≤24 indicated patient satisfaction.

Conclusion: Lower baseline ODI and greater improvements in postoperative ODI are associated with an increased likelihood of patient satisfaction. A relative improvement of ≥66% or achieving a postoperative ODI score of ≤24 were the most indicative thresholds for predicting patient satisfaction, proving more sensitivity and specificity than an absolute change of ≥38 points.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Spine
Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
361
审稿时长
6.0 months
期刊介绍: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store. Recognized internationally as the leading journal in its field, Spine is an international, peer-reviewed, bi-weekly periodical that considers for publication original articles in the field of Spine. It is the leading subspecialty journal for the treatment of spinal disorders. Only original papers are considered for publication with the understanding that they are contributed solely to Spine. The Journal does not publish articles reporting material that has been reported at length elsewhere.
期刊最新文献
Temporal Trends of Improvement After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion. Intraoperative Hypotension Is an Important Modifiable Risk Factor for Major Complications in Spinal Fusion Surgery. Clinical Outcome of Lumbar Hybrid Surgery in a Consecutive Series of Patients With Long-term Follow-up. Does Paraspinal Muscle Mass Predict Lumbar Lordosis Before and After Decompression for Degenerative Spinal Stenosis? The Utility of the Surgical Apgar Score in Assessing the Risk of Perioperative Complications Following Spinal Fusion Surgery for Pediatric Patients With Scoliosis and Cerebral Palsy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1