Jonas Sundkvist, Per Hulenvik, Viktor Schmidt, Per Jolbäck, Mikael Sundfeldt, Per Fischer, Cecilia Rogmark, Hans Juto, Olof Wolf, Sebastian Mukka
{"title":"基本型股骨颈骨折:源自瑞典骨折登记册的观察性研究。","authors":"Jonas Sundkvist, Per Hulenvik, Viktor Schmidt, Per Jolbäck, Mikael Sundfeldt, Per Fischer, Cecilia Rogmark, Hans Juto, Olof Wolf, Sebastian Mukka","doi":"10.2340/17453674.2024.40503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Limited research has been conducted on basicervical femoral neck fractures (bFNFs). The importance of displacement in clinical outcomes remains unclear. We aimed to characterize patient demographics, degree of displacement, treatment, treatment failures, and reoperations in a cohort of fractures from the Swedish Fracture Register (SFR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>1,260 fractures in 1,185 individuals ≥ 60 years who had a bFNF registered in the SFR at 6 orthopedic departments from 2011 to 2020 were screened through radiographic review. The final sample included 291 patients with a confirmed bFNF. The medical records of these 291 patients were reviewed. We assessed baseline characteristics, initial fracture dislocation, treatment methods, tip-apex distance, failures, reoperations, and mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age was 82 years (range 60-101, 55% women). 98 (34%) were undisplaced and 193 (66%) displaced. All patients underwent operative treatment. In the undisplaced group 95 (97%) patients received internal fixation (IF) and 3 (3%) had primary hip arthroplasty. In the displaced group 149 (77%) received IF and 41 (21%) had primary hip arthroplasty. 33 (11%) suffered treatment failure. When treating an undisplaced bFNF with IF, only 3 (3%) experienced treatment failure, in contrast to the 24 (16%) failure rate for a displaced bFNF.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Undisplaced bFNFs have a low failure rate when treated with IF. For displaced bFNF treated with IF the failure rate is considerably higher. There is a need for further investigation of classification, treatment, and outcome of bFNF.</p>","PeriodicalId":6916,"journal":{"name":"Acta Orthopaedica","volume":"95 ","pages":"250-255"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11109924/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Basicervical femoral neck fractures: an observational study derived from the Swedish Fracture Register.\",\"authors\":\"Jonas Sundkvist, Per Hulenvik, Viktor Schmidt, Per Jolbäck, Mikael Sundfeldt, Per Fischer, Cecilia Rogmark, Hans Juto, Olof Wolf, Sebastian Mukka\",\"doi\":\"10.2340/17453674.2024.40503\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Limited research has been conducted on basicervical femoral neck fractures (bFNFs). The importance of displacement in clinical outcomes remains unclear. We aimed to characterize patient demographics, degree of displacement, treatment, treatment failures, and reoperations in a cohort of fractures from the Swedish Fracture Register (SFR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>1,260 fractures in 1,185 individuals ≥ 60 years who had a bFNF registered in the SFR at 6 orthopedic departments from 2011 to 2020 were screened through radiographic review. The final sample included 291 patients with a confirmed bFNF. The medical records of these 291 patients were reviewed. We assessed baseline characteristics, initial fracture dislocation, treatment methods, tip-apex distance, failures, reoperations, and mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age was 82 years (range 60-101, 55% women). 98 (34%) were undisplaced and 193 (66%) displaced. All patients underwent operative treatment. In the undisplaced group 95 (97%) patients received internal fixation (IF) and 3 (3%) had primary hip arthroplasty. In the displaced group 149 (77%) received IF and 41 (21%) had primary hip arthroplasty. 33 (11%) suffered treatment failure. When treating an undisplaced bFNF with IF, only 3 (3%) experienced treatment failure, in contrast to the 24 (16%) failure rate for a displaced bFNF.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Undisplaced bFNFs have a low failure rate when treated with IF. For displaced bFNF treated with IF the failure rate is considerably higher. There is a need for further investigation of classification, treatment, and outcome of bFNF.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6916,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Orthopaedica\",\"volume\":\"95 \",\"pages\":\"250-255\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11109924/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Orthopaedica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2024.40503\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Orthopaedica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2024.40503","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景和目的:关于股骨颈基础骨折(bFNFs)的研究十分有限。移位在临床结果中的重要性仍不明确。我们的目的是在瑞典骨折登记处(SFR)的一组骨折患者中分析患者的人口统计学特征、移位程度、治疗、治疗失败和再手术情况。方法:通过放射学检查筛选了2011年至2020年期间在6个骨科部门登记的1185名年龄≥60岁的股骨颈骨折患者中的1260例骨折患者。最终样本包括 291 名确诊为 bFNF 的患者。我们对这 291 名患者的病历进行了审查。我们评估了基线特征、初始骨折脱位、治疗方法、尖端到顶端的距离、失败、再手术和死亡率:平均年龄为82岁(60-101岁,55%为女性)。98例(34%)为未移位,193例(66%)为移位。所有患者均接受了手术治疗。在未移位组中,95 名(97%)患者接受了内固定术(IF),3 名(3%)患者接受了初级髋关节置换术。在移位组中,149(77%)名患者接受了内固定术,41(21%)名患者接受了初级髋关节置换术。33人(11%)治疗失败。使用 IF 治疗未移位的 bFNF 时,只有 3 例(3%)治疗失败,而移位的 bFNF 则有 24 例(16%)治疗失败:结论:使用 IF 治疗未移位的 bFNF 失败率较低。结论:使用 IF 治疗未移位 bFNF 的失败率较低,而使用 IF 治疗移位 bFNF 的失败率则要高得多。有必要进一步研究 bFNF 的分类、治疗和结果。
Basicervical femoral neck fractures: an observational study derived from the Swedish Fracture Register.
Background and purpose: Limited research has been conducted on basicervical femoral neck fractures (bFNFs). The importance of displacement in clinical outcomes remains unclear. We aimed to characterize patient demographics, degree of displacement, treatment, treatment failures, and reoperations in a cohort of fractures from the Swedish Fracture Register (SFR).
Methods: 1,260 fractures in 1,185 individuals ≥ 60 years who had a bFNF registered in the SFR at 6 orthopedic departments from 2011 to 2020 were screened through radiographic review. The final sample included 291 patients with a confirmed bFNF. The medical records of these 291 patients were reviewed. We assessed baseline characteristics, initial fracture dislocation, treatment methods, tip-apex distance, failures, reoperations, and mortality.
Results: The mean age was 82 years (range 60-101, 55% women). 98 (34%) were undisplaced and 193 (66%) displaced. All patients underwent operative treatment. In the undisplaced group 95 (97%) patients received internal fixation (IF) and 3 (3%) had primary hip arthroplasty. In the displaced group 149 (77%) received IF and 41 (21%) had primary hip arthroplasty. 33 (11%) suffered treatment failure. When treating an undisplaced bFNF with IF, only 3 (3%) experienced treatment failure, in contrast to the 24 (16%) failure rate for a displaced bFNF.
Conclusion: Undisplaced bFNFs have a low failure rate when treated with IF. For displaced bFNF treated with IF the failure rate is considerably higher. There is a need for further investigation of classification, treatment, and outcome of bFNF.
期刊介绍:
Acta Orthopaedica (previously Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica) presents original articles of basic research interest, as well as clinical studies in the field of orthopedics and related sub disciplines. Ever since the journal was founded in 1930, by a group of Scandinavian orthopedic surgeons, the journal has been published for an international audience. Acta Orthopaedica is owned by the Nordic Orthopaedic Federation and is the official publication of this federation.