{"title":"银屑病关节炎患者在接受肿瘤坏死因子-α抑制剂一线治疗后使用塞库单抗:一项真实世界的回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Tumay Ak, Leyla Mustafayeva, Ali Yagiz Ayla, Yeliz Celik, Gunay Can, Serdal Ugurlu","doi":"10.46497/ArchRheumatol.2024.10050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study compared the secukinumab treatment responses and adverse effects in psoriatic arthritis patients who received secukinumab as second-line with those that received secukinumab after two or more tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The retrospective study included 68 psoriatic arthritis patients followed up between October 2018 and October 2021. The patients were divided into two groups according to their anti-TNF-α treatment history. Group 1 consisted of 29 patients (11 males, 18 females; mean age: 45.3±13.3 years; range, 21 to 69 years) who had previously received one anti-TNF-α agent, while Group 2 included 39 patients (18 males, 21 females; mean age: 46.4±13.0 years; range, 24 to 70 years) who had been treated with two or more anti-TNF-α agents. Treatment responses of the groups were measured and compared using the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS). A posttreatment BASDAI score ≤4 was used as a criterion for remission.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean duration of secukinumab treatment was 16.6±12.7 months for Group 1 and 16.0±11.6 months for Group 2 (p=0.84). Both groups responded significantly to secukinumab in terms of BASDAI and VAS scores (p<0.001 and p<0.001, respectively). Group 1 had a greater decline in BASDAI and VAS scores than Group 2 (p=0.045 and p=0.032, respectively). Furthermore, the remission rate was greater in Group 1 compared to Group 2 (58% <i>vs.</i> 34%, p=0.03). The adverse effects of secukinumab treatment were an allergic reaction in Group 1 and one case of ulcerative colitis in Group 2.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Second-line secukinumab treatment resulted in a greater decline in BASDAI and VAS scores. Moreover, secukinumab achieved a significantly higher rate of remission when it was used as second-line therapy after one anti-TNF-α agent.</p>","PeriodicalId":93884,"journal":{"name":"Archives of rheumatology","volume":"39 1","pages":"71-80"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11104763/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Secukinumab after first-line tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitor therapy in psoriatic arthritis: A real-world retrospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Tumay Ak, Leyla Mustafayeva, Ali Yagiz Ayla, Yeliz Celik, Gunay Can, Serdal Ugurlu\",\"doi\":\"10.46497/ArchRheumatol.2024.10050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study compared the secukinumab treatment responses and adverse effects in psoriatic arthritis patients who received secukinumab as second-line with those that received secukinumab after two or more tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The retrospective study included 68 psoriatic arthritis patients followed up between October 2018 and October 2021. The patients were divided into two groups according to their anti-TNF-α treatment history. Group 1 consisted of 29 patients (11 males, 18 females; mean age: 45.3±13.3 years; range, 21 to 69 years) who had previously received one anti-TNF-α agent, while Group 2 included 39 patients (18 males, 21 females; mean age: 46.4±13.0 years; range, 24 to 70 years) who had been treated with two or more anti-TNF-α agents. Treatment responses of the groups were measured and compared using the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS). A posttreatment BASDAI score ≤4 was used as a criterion for remission.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean duration of secukinumab treatment was 16.6±12.7 months for Group 1 and 16.0±11.6 months for Group 2 (p=0.84). Both groups responded significantly to secukinumab in terms of BASDAI and VAS scores (p<0.001 and p<0.001, respectively). Group 1 had a greater decline in BASDAI and VAS scores than Group 2 (p=0.045 and p=0.032, respectively). Furthermore, the remission rate was greater in Group 1 compared to Group 2 (58% <i>vs.</i> 34%, p=0.03). The adverse effects of secukinumab treatment were an allergic reaction in Group 1 and one case of ulcerative colitis in Group 2.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Second-line secukinumab treatment resulted in a greater decline in BASDAI and VAS scores. Moreover, secukinumab achieved a significantly higher rate of remission when it was used as second-line therapy after one anti-TNF-α agent.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93884,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of rheumatology\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"71-80\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11104763/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46497/ArchRheumatol.2024.10050\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46497/ArchRheumatol.2024.10050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
研究目的本研究比较了作为二线接受secukinumab治疗的银屑病关节炎患者与在接受两种或两种以上肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)抑制剂后接受secukinumab治疗的患者的secukinumab治疗反应和不良反应:回顾性研究纳入了2018年10月至2021年10月期间随访的68名银屑病关节炎患者。根据患者的抗TNF-α治疗史将其分为两组。第一组包括29名患者(男性11名,女性18名;平均年龄:45.3±13.3岁;年龄范围:21至69岁),他们曾接受过一种抗TNF-α药物治疗;第二组包括39名患者(男性18名,女性21名;平均年龄:46.4±13.0岁;年龄范围:24至70岁),他们曾接受过两种或两种以上抗TNF-α药物治疗。使用巴斯强直性脊柱炎疾病活动指数(BASDAI)和视觉模拟量表(VAS)测量并比较各组的治疗反应。治疗后BASDAI评分≤4分为缓解标准:结果:secukinumab治疗1组的平均疗程为(16.6±12.7)个月,2组为(16.0±11.6)个月(P=0.84)。从 BASDAI 和 VAS 评分来看,两组患者对 secukinumab 均有明显反应(pvs. 34%, p=0.03)。secukinumab治疗的不良反应为第一组出现过敏反应,第二组出现一例溃疡性结肠炎:结论:二线secukinumab治疗使BASDAI和VAS评分下降幅度更大。结论:二线secukinumab治疗使BASDAI和VAS评分下降幅度更大。此外,在使用一种抗TNF-α药物后,secukinumab作为二线治疗的缓解率明显更高。
Secukinumab after first-line tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitor therapy in psoriatic arthritis: A real-world retrospective cohort study.
Objectives: This study compared the secukinumab treatment responses and adverse effects in psoriatic arthritis patients who received secukinumab as second-line with those that received secukinumab after two or more tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors.
Patients and methods: The retrospective study included 68 psoriatic arthritis patients followed up between October 2018 and October 2021. The patients were divided into two groups according to their anti-TNF-α treatment history. Group 1 consisted of 29 patients (11 males, 18 females; mean age: 45.3±13.3 years; range, 21 to 69 years) who had previously received one anti-TNF-α agent, while Group 2 included 39 patients (18 males, 21 females; mean age: 46.4±13.0 years; range, 24 to 70 years) who had been treated with two or more anti-TNF-α agents. Treatment responses of the groups were measured and compared using the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS). A posttreatment BASDAI score ≤4 was used as a criterion for remission.
Results: The mean duration of secukinumab treatment was 16.6±12.7 months for Group 1 and 16.0±11.6 months for Group 2 (p=0.84). Both groups responded significantly to secukinumab in terms of BASDAI and VAS scores (p<0.001 and p<0.001, respectively). Group 1 had a greater decline in BASDAI and VAS scores than Group 2 (p=0.045 and p=0.032, respectively). Furthermore, the remission rate was greater in Group 1 compared to Group 2 (58% vs. 34%, p=0.03). The adverse effects of secukinumab treatment were an allergic reaction in Group 1 and one case of ulcerative colitis in Group 2.
Conclusion: Second-line secukinumab treatment resulted in a greater decline in BASDAI and VAS scores. Moreover, secukinumab achieved a significantly higher rate of remission when it was used as second-line therapy after one anti-TNF-α agent.