左心室辅助装置前内窥镜评估不会降低日后消化道出血的风险:一项多中心研究。

IF 2.1 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Annals of Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-10 DOI:10.20524/aog.2024.0878
Jiahao Peng, Samanthika Devalaraju, Mohamed Azab, William T Cates, Molly Stone, Jonathan Reichstein, Sneha Shaha, Subhasis Chatterjee, Andrew B Civitello, Mourad H Senussi, B Joseph Elmunzer, Michael Volk, Wasseem Skef
{"title":"左心室辅助装置前内窥镜评估不会降低日后消化道出血的风险:一项多中心研究。","authors":"Jiahao Peng, Samanthika Devalaraju, Mohamed Azab, William T Cates, Molly Stone, Jonathan Reichstein, Sneha Shaha, Subhasis Chatterjee, Andrew B Civitello, Mourad H Senussi, B Joseph Elmunzer, Michael Volk, Wasseem Skef","doi":"10.20524/aog.2024.0878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is a common complication after placement of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD). Some institutions attempt to mitigate post-LVAD GIB using preoperative endoscopy. Our study evaluated whether preoperative endoscopy was associated with a lower risk of post-LVAD GIB.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a multicenter cohort study of patients who underwent LVAD insertion from 2010-2019 at 3 academic sites. A total of 398 study participants were categorized based on whether they underwent preoperative endoscopy or not. The follow-up period was 1 year and the primary outcome was GIB. Secondary outcomes were severe bleeding and intraprocedural complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 114 patients experienced GIB within 1 year, with a higher rate in the endoscopy cohort (36.4% vs. 24.8%, P=0.015). After adjusting for covariables, the endoscopy cohort remained at increased risk of GIB (adjusted odds ratio 1.77, 95% confidence interval 1.05-2.976; P=0.032). Severe bleeding was common (47.4%). Arteriovenous malformations (48 cases) and peptic ulcer disease (17 cases) were the most identified sources of GIB. Only 1 minor adverse event occurred during preoperative endoscopy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study suggests that pre-LVAD endoscopy is associated with a higher risk of GIB post LVAD, despite controlling for confounders. While this was an observational study and may not have captured all confounders, it appears that endoscopic screening may not be warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":7978,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterology","volume":"37 3","pages":"313-320"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11107400/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pre-left ventricular assist device endoscopic evaluation does not reduce the risk of later gastrointestinal bleeding: a multicenter study.\",\"authors\":\"Jiahao Peng, Samanthika Devalaraju, Mohamed Azab, William T Cates, Molly Stone, Jonathan Reichstein, Sneha Shaha, Subhasis Chatterjee, Andrew B Civitello, Mourad H Senussi, B Joseph Elmunzer, Michael Volk, Wasseem Skef\",\"doi\":\"10.20524/aog.2024.0878\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is a common complication after placement of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD). Some institutions attempt to mitigate post-LVAD GIB using preoperative endoscopy. Our study evaluated whether preoperative endoscopy was associated with a lower risk of post-LVAD GIB.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a multicenter cohort study of patients who underwent LVAD insertion from 2010-2019 at 3 academic sites. A total of 398 study participants were categorized based on whether they underwent preoperative endoscopy or not. The follow-up period was 1 year and the primary outcome was GIB. Secondary outcomes were severe bleeding and intraprocedural complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 114 patients experienced GIB within 1 year, with a higher rate in the endoscopy cohort (36.4% vs. 24.8%, P=0.015). After adjusting for covariables, the endoscopy cohort remained at increased risk of GIB (adjusted odds ratio 1.77, 95% confidence interval 1.05-2.976; P=0.032). Severe bleeding was common (47.4%). Arteriovenous malformations (48 cases) and peptic ulcer disease (17 cases) were the most identified sources of GIB. Only 1 minor adverse event occurred during preoperative endoscopy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study suggests that pre-LVAD endoscopy is associated with a higher risk of GIB post LVAD, despite controlling for confounders. While this was an observational study and may not have captured all confounders, it appears that endoscopic screening may not be warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\"37 3\",\"pages\":\"313-320\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11107400/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20524/aog.2024.0878\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/4/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20524/aog.2024.0878","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:胃肠道出血(GIB)是放置左心室辅助装置(LVAD)后常见的并发症。一些机构试图通过术前内镜检查来减轻左心室辅助装置术后胃肠道出血。我们的研究评估了术前内镜检查是否与降低 LVAD 术后 GIB 风险有关:这是一项多中心队列研究,研究对象是 2010-2019 年期间在 3 个学术机构接受 LVAD 植入术的患者。共有398名研究参与者根据是否接受术前内镜检查进行了分类。随访期为 1 年,主要结果为 GIB。次要结果为严重出血和术中并发症:共有114名患者在1年内发生了GIB,其中内镜检查组的发生率更高(36.4%对24.8%,P=0.015)。调整协变量后,内镜组发生 GIB 的风险仍然较高(调整后的几率比 1.77,95% 置信区间 1.05-2.976;P=0.032)。严重出血很常见(47.4%)。动静脉畸形(48 例)和消化性溃疡病(17 例)是最常见的 GIB 来源。只有 1 例轻微不良事件发生在术前内镜检查期间:我们的研究表明,尽管控制了混杂因素,但 LVAD 术前内镜检查与 LVAD 术后发生 GIB 的较高风险有关。虽然这是一项观察性研究,可能没有考虑到所有的混杂因素,但内镜筛查似乎没有必要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pre-left ventricular assist device endoscopic evaluation does not reduce the risk of later gastrointestinal bleeding: a multicenter study.

Background: Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is a common complication after placement of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD). Some institutions attempt to mitigate post-LVAD GIB using preoperative endoscopy. Our study evaluated whether preoperative endoscopy was associated with a lower risk of post-LVAD GIB.

Methods: This was a multicenter cohort study of patients who underwent LVAD insertion from 2010-2019 at 3 academic sites. A total of 398 study participants were categorized based on whether they underwent preoperative endoscopy or not. The follow-up period was 1 year and the primary outcome was GIB. Secondary outcomes were severe bleeding and intraprocedural complications.

Results: A total of 114 patients experienced GIB within 1 year, with a higher rate in the endoscopy cohort (36.4% vs. 24.8%, P=0.015). After adjusting for covariables, the endoscopy cohort remained at increased risk of GIB (adjusted odds ratio 1.77, 95% confidence interval 1.05-2.976; P=0.032). Severe bleeding was common (47.4%). Arteriovenous malformations (48 cases) and peptic ulcer disease (17 cases) were the most identified sources of GIB. Only 1 minor adverse event occurred during preoperative endoscopy.

Conclusions: Our study suggests that pre-LVAD endoscopy is associated with a higher risk of GIB post LVAD, despite controlling for confounders. While this was an observational study and may not have captured all confounders, it appears that endoscopic screening may not be warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Gastroenterology
Annals of Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
期刊最新文献
Authors' reply. Clinical features and outcomes of total pancreatic lipomatosis with chronic pancreatitis: a case series. Endoscopic management of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis strictures: meta-analysis and systematic literature review. Gastrointestinal cancer incidence after lung transplantation in sarcoidosis patients. Landscape of B lymphocytes and plasma cells in digestive tract carcinomas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1