减肥手术后体重减轻的最小重要差异:增强 BODY-Q 的可解释性。

IF 2.2 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Clinical Obesity Pub Date : 2024-05-22 DOI:10.1111/cob.12675
Farima Dalaei, Phillip J. Dijkhorst, Sören Möller, Claire E. E. de Vries, Lotte Poulsen, Sophocles H. Voineskos, Manraj N. Kaur, Jørn Bo Thomsen, Ruben N. van Veen, Claus B. Juhl, Alin Andries, René K. Støving, Stefan J. Cano, Anne F. Klassen, Andrea L. Pusic, Jens A. Sørensen
{"title":"减肥手术后体重减轻的最小重要差异:增强 BODY-Q 的可解释性。","authors":"Farima Dalaei,&nbsp;Phillip J. Dijkhorst,&nbsp;Sören Möller,&nbsp;Claire E. E. de Vries,&nbsp;Lotte Poulsen,&nbsp;Sophocles H. Voineskos,&nbsp;Manraj N. Kaur,&nbsp;Jørn Bo Thomsen,&nbsp;Ruben N. van Veen,&nbsp;Claus B. Juhl,&nbsp;Alin Andries,&nbsp;René K. Støving,&nbsp;Stefan J. Cano,&nbsp;Anne F. Klassen,&nbsp;Andrea L. Pusic,&nbsp;Jens A. Sørensen","doi":"10.1111/cob.12675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>BODY-Q is a patient-reported outcome measure for comprehensive assessment of outcomes specific to patients undergoing bariatric surgery. The clinical utility of BODY-Q is hampered by the lack of guidance on score interpretation. This study aimed to determine minimal important difference (MID) for assessment of BODY-Q. Prospective BODY-Q data from Denmark and the Netherlands pre- and post-bariatric surgery were collected. Two distribution-based methods were used to estimate MID by 0.2 standard deviations of baseline scores and the mean standardized response change of scores from baseline to 3-years postoperatively. In total, 5476 assessments from 2253 participants were included of which 1628 (72.3%) underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, 586 (26.0%) sleeve gastrectomy, 33 (1.5%) gastric banding, and 6 (0.03%) other surgeries. The mean age was 45.1 ± 10.9 with a mean BMI of 46.6 ± 9.6. Baseline MID ranged from 1 to 4 in health-related quality of life (HRQL) and from 2 to 8 in appearance scales. The mean change of scores ranged from 4 to 5 in HRQL and from 4 to 7 in the appearance scales. The estimated MID for the change in BODY-Q HRQL and appearance scales ranged from 3 to 8 and is recommended for use to interpret BODY-Q scores and assess treatment effects in bariatric surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":10399,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Obesity","volume":"14 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cob.12675","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Minimal important difference in weight loss following bariatric surgery: Enhancing BODY-Q interpretability\",\"authors\":\"Farima Dalaei,&nbsp;Phillip J. Dijkhorst,&nbsp;Sören Möller,&nbsp;Claire E. E. de Vries,&nbsp;Lotte Poulsen,&nbsp;Sophocles H. Voineskos,&nbsp;Manraj N. Kaur,&nbsp;Jørn Bo Thomsen,&nbsp;Ruben N. van Veen,&nbsp;Claus B. Juhl,&nbsp;Alin Andries,&nbsp;René K. Støving,&nbsp;Stefan J. Cano,&nbsp;Anne F. Klassen,&nbsp;Andrea L. Pusic,&nbsp;Jens A. Sørensen\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cob.12675\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>BODY-Q is a patient-reported outcome measure for comprehensive assessment of outcomes specific to patients undergoing bariatric surgery. The clinical utility of BODY-Q is hampered by the lack of guidance on score interpretation. This study aimed to determine minimal important difference (MID) for assessment of BODY-Q. Prospective BODY-Q data from Denmark and the Netherlands pre- and post-bariatric surgery were collected. Two distribution-based methods were used to estimate MID by 0.2 standard deviations of baseline scores and the mean standardized response change of scores from baseline to 3-years postoperatively. In total, 5476 assessments from 2253 participants were included of which 1628 (72.3%) underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, 586 (26.0%) sleeve gastrectomy, 33 (1.5%) gastric banding, and 6 (0.03%) other surgeries. The mean age was 45.1 ± 10.9 with a mean BMI of 46.6 ± 9.6. Baseline MID ranged from 1 to 4 in health-related quality of life (HRQL) and from 2 to 8 in appearance scales. The mean change of scores ranged from 4 to 5 in HRQL and from 4 to 7 in the appearance scales. The estimated MID for the change in BODY-Q HRQL and appearance scales ranged from 3 to 8 and is recommended for use to interpret BODY-Q scores and assess treatment effects in bariatric surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Obesity\",\"volume\":\"14 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cob.12675\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Obesity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cob.12675\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Obesity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cob.12675","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

BODY-Q 是一种患者报告的结果测量方法,用于全面评估减肥手术患者的特定结果。由于缺乏评分解释指南,BODY-Q 的临床实用性受到影响。本研究旨在确定评估 BODY-Q 的最小重要差异 (MID)。研究收集了丹麦和荷兰减肥手术前后的前瞻性 BODY-Q 数据。研究采用了两种基于分布的方法,分别以基线分数的 0.2 个标准差和从基线到术后 3 年分数的平均标准化反应变化来估算 MID。总共纳入了来自 2253 名参与者的 5476 项评估,其中 1628 人(72.3%)接受了 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术,586 人(26.0%)接受了袖状胃切除术,33 人(1.5%)接受了胃束带术,6 人(0.03%)接受了其他手术。平均年龄为 45.1 ± 10.9 岁,平均体重指数为 46.6 ± 9.6。健康相关生活质量(HRQL)的基线 MID 从 1 到 4 不等,外观量表的基线 MID 从 2 到 8 不等。健康相关生活质量(HRQL)的平均得分变化范围为 4 到 5 分,外观量表的平均得分变化范围为 4 到 7 分。BODY-Q HRQL和外观量表变化的估计中位数介于3到8之间,建议用于解释BODY-Q评分和评估减肥手术的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Minimal important difference in weight loss following bariatric surgery: Enhancing BODY-Q interpretability

BODY-Q is a patient-reported outcome measure for comprehensive assessment of outcomes specific to patients undergoing bariatric surgery. The clinical utility of BODY-Q is hampered by the lack of guidance on score interpretation. This study aimed to determine minimal important difference (MID) for assessment of BODY-Q. Prospective BODY-Q data from Denmark and the Netherlands pre- and post-bariatric surgery were collected. Two distribution-based methods were used to estimate MID by 0.2 standard deviations of baseline scores and the mean standardized response change of scores from baseline to 3-years postoperatively. In total, 5476 assessments from 2253 participants were included of which 1628 (72.3%) underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, 586 (26.0%) sleeve gastrectomy, 33 (1.5%) gastric banding, and 6 (0.03%) other surgeries. The mean age was 45.1 ± 10.9 with a mean BMI of 46.6 ± 9.6. Baseline MID ranged from 1 to 4 in health-related quality of life (HRQL) and from 2 to 8 in appearance scales. The mean change of scores ranged from 4 to 5 in HRQL and from 4 to 7 in the appearance scales. The estimated MID for the change in BODY-Q HRQL and appearance scales ranged from 3 to 8 and is recommended for use to interpret BODY-Q scores and assess treatment effects in bariatric surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Obesity
Clinical Obesity ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: Clinical Obesity is an international peer-reviewed journal publishing high quality translational and clinical research papers and reviews focussing on obesity and its co-morbidities. Key areas of interest are: • Patient assessment, classification, diagnosis and prognosis • Drug treatments, clinical trials and supporting research • Bariatric surgery and follow-up issues • Surgical approaches to remove body fat • Pharmacological, dietary and behavioural approaches for weight loss • Clinical physiology • Clinically relevant epidemiology • Psychological aspects of obesity • Co-morbidities • Nursing and care of patients with obesity.
期刊最新文献
Healthcare utilization associated with obesity management in Ontario, Canada. Effect of the National Enhanced Service for weight management on the content of annual review consultations for patients living with obesity and hypertension and/or diabetes. Issue Information A cluster randomised controlled trial investigating the efficacy of family-centred obesity management program in primary care settings: A study protocol. Effect of interdisciplinary obesity care on metabolic markers and body weight in people with type 2 diabetes in a rural setting: A randomised controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1