肌力训练对冠心病患者运动功能的影响:一项荟萃分析。

IF 0.2 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL International journal of clinical and experimental medicine Pub Date : 2015-10-15 eCollection Date: 2015-01-01
Yu-Jie Yang, Xiao-Hua He, Hai-Ying Guo, Xue-Qiang Wang, Yi Zhu
{"title":"肌力训练对冠心病患者运动功能的影响:一项荟萃分析。","authors":"Yu-Jie Yang, Xiao-Hua He, Hai-Ying Guo, Xue-Qiang Wang, Yi Zhu","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Existing literature has shown that patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) can benefit greatly from the strength training; therefore, the strength training should play a more important role in cardiac rehabilitation. However, the medical community may still have conservation to apply the strength training owing to no comprehensive study so far to compare the effectiveness of the strength training to the other trainings, such as aerobic training.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effect of strength training on motor function in patients with CAD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Published articles from the earliest date available to July 2015 were identified using electronic searches. Two reviewers selected independently relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating exercise program with strength training versus control interventions (exercise without strength training, including aerobic training and no exercise group) for the treatment of CAD patients. We examined effects of exercise with strength training versus control interventions on peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak), duration of exercise test and muscle strength. Two reviewers extracted data independently.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty seven trials that represented 1151 participants passed the selection criteria and were evaluated for the effects of strength training in CAD patients. For improving VO2peak [SMD (95%CI) = 0.58 (0.11, 1.06)] and muscle strength [upper limb, SMD (95% CI) =0.44 (0.34, 0.55); lower limb, SMD (95% CI) =0.33 (0.16, 0.50)], exercise program with strength training were significantly more effective than one without it. But there is no significantly difference on duration of exercise test [SMD (95%CI) = 0.17 (-0.04, 0.39)] in strength training group than in control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We conclude strength training is effective in improving muscle strength and VO2peak, in CAD patients, when compared to patients with control group. Furthermore, our evaluations suggest that strength training does not compromise clinical trial completion or safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":13892,"journal":{"name":"International journal of clinical and experimental medicine","volume":"8 10","pages":"17536-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4694245/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficiency of muscle strength training on motor function in patients with coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Yu-Jie Yang, Xiao-Hua He, Hai-Ying Guo, Xue-Qiang Wang, Yi Zhu\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Existing literature has shown that patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) can benefit greatly from the strength training; therefore, the strength training should play a more important role in cardiac rehabilitation. However, the medical community may still have conservation to apply the strength training owing to no comprehensive study so far to compare the effectiveness of the strength training to the other trainings, such as aerobic training.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effect of strength training on motor function in patients with CAD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Published articles from the earliest date available to July 2015 were identified using electronic searches. Two reviewers selected independently relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating exercise program with strength training versus control interventions (exercise without strength training, including aerobic training and no exercise group) for the treatment of CAD patients. We examined effects of exercise with strength training versus control interventions on peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak), duration of exercise test and muscle strength. Two reviewers extracted data independently.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty seven trials that represented 1151 participants passed the selection criteria and were evaluated for the effects of strength training in CAD patients. For improving VO2peak [SMD (95%CI) = 0.58 (0.11, 1.06)] and muscle strength [upper limb, SMD (95% CI) =0.44 (0.34, 0.55); lower limb, SMD (95% CI) =0.33 (0.16, 0.50)], exercise program with strength training were significantly more effective than one without it. But there is no significantly difference on duration of exercise test [SMD (95%CI) = 0.17 (-0.04, 0.39)] in strength training group than in control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We conclude strength training is effective in improving muscle strength and VO2peak, in CAD patients, when compared to patients with control group. Furthermore, our evaluations suggest that strength training does not compromise clinical trial completion or safety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of clinical and experimental medicine\",\"volume\":\"8 10\",\"pages\":\"17536-50\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4694245/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of clinical and experimental medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2015/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of clinical and experimental medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:现有文献表明,冠状动脉疾病(CAD)患者可从力量训练中获益良多,因此,力量训练应在心脏康复中发挥更重要的作用。然而,由于迄今为止还没有一项全面的研究来比较力量训练与其他训练(如有氧训练)的效果,医学界可能仍然对力量训练的应用持保留态度:评估力量训练对 CAD 患者运动功能的影响:通过电子检索确定了从最早可获得的日期到 2015 年 7 月发表的文章。两名审稿人独立选择了相关的随机对照试验(RCT),这些试验研究了治疗 CAD 患者的带力量训练的运动项目与对照干预(不带力量训练的运动,包括有氧训练和无运动组)。我们研究了有力量训练的运动与对照干预对峰值摄氧量(VO2peak)、运动测试持续时间和肌肉力量的影响。两名审稿人独立提取数据:代表 1151 名参与者的 27 项试验通过了筛选标准,并评估了力量训练对 CAD 患者的影响。对于提高 VO2peak [SMD (95%CI) = 0.58 (0.11, 1.06)]和肌肉力量[上肢,SMD (95% CI) =0.44 (0.34, 0.55);下肢,SMD (95% CI) =0.33 (0.16, 0.50)],有力量训练的运动项目明显比没有力量训练的有效。但与对照组相比,力量训练组的运动测试持续时间[SMD (95%CI) = 0.17 (-0.04, 0.39)]没有明显差异:我们得出结论:与对照组相比,力量训练能有效改善 CAD 患者的肌肉力量和 VO2 峰值。此外,我们的评估表明,力量训练不会影响临床试验的完成或安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficiency of muscle strength training on motor function in patients with coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis.

Background: Existing literature has shown that patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) can benefit greatly from the strength training; therefore, the strength training should play a more important role in cardiac rehabilitation. However, the medical community may still have conservation to apply the strength training owing to no comprehensive study so far to compare the effectiveness of the strength training to the other trainings, such as aerobic training.

Objective: To evaluate the effect of strength training on motor function in patients with CAD.

Methods: Published articles from the earliest date available to July 2015 were identified using electronic searches. Two reviewers selected independently relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating exercise program with strength training versus control interventions (exercise without strength training, including aerobic training and no exercise group) for the treatment of CAD patients. We examined effects of exercise with strength training versus control interventions on peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak), duration of exercise test and muscle strength. Two reviewers extracted data independently.

Results: Twenty seven trials that represented 1151 participants passed the selection criteria and were evaluated for the effects of strength training in CAD patients. For improving VO2peak [SMD (95%CI) = 0.58 (0.11, 1.06)] and muscle strength [upper limb, SMD (95% CI) =0.44 (0.34, 0.55); lower limb, SMD (95% CI) =0.33 (0.16, 0.50)], exercise program with strength training were significantly more effective than one without it. But there is no significantly difference on duration of exercise test [SMD (95%CI) = 0.17 (-0.04, 0.39)] in strength training group than in control group.

Conclusions: We conclude strength training is effective in improving muscle strength and VO2peak, in CAD patients, when compared to patients with control group. Furthermore, our evaluations suggest that strength training does not compromise clinical trial completion or safety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
A case report of moderate COVID-19 with an extremely long-term viral shedding period in China Lentivirus-Mediated knockdown of tectonic family member 1 inhibits medulloblastoma cell proliferation [Retraction]. Classification of MRI and psychological testing data based on support vector machine. Nucleostemin regulates proliferation and migration of gastric cancer and correlates with its malignancy [Retraction]. Effect of lipiodol and methylene blue on the thoracoscopic preoperative positioning [Retraction].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1