从出血角度看无痛剖宫产的安全性。

IF 0.2 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL International journal of clinical and experimental medicine Pub Date : 2015-11-15 eCollection Date: 2015-01-01
Serkan Bodur, Ismet Gun, Ozkan Ozdamar, Mustafa Alparslan Babayigit
{"title":"从出血角度看无痛剖宫产的安全性。","authors":"Serkan Bodur, Ismet Gun, Ozkan Ozdamar, Mustafa Alparslan Babayigit","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Hemorrhage still continues to be reported as one of the leading causes of maternal mortality and morbidity. Intraoperative estimation of the blood loss seems to be complex and misleading as it is impaired by the amount of amniotic fluid and blood from the placenta. The present study was aimed to investigate the safety of intraoperative deciding on an uneventful cesarean section in a low risk patient population.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>One hundred patients free from hemorrhage risks and experienced an uneventful elective cesarean section, were included to the study. The decline in hemoglobin and hematocrit values, calculated blood loss, transfusion rate and presence of hemorrhage related symptoms and signs were accepted as the main outcomes of the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin values were detected as 12.09±0.18 g/dl and 10.72±1.39 g/dl, respectively. The average decrease in hemoglobin was 1.36±1.06 g/dl. The observed decrease in hemoglobin values were less than 10% in 34.4% of the patients. The average blood loss was calculated to be 517.06±417.55 ml. There were no patients with signs and symptoms of hemorrhage. Cross match transfusion ratio, transfusion probability and transfusion index was calculated as zero.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The decision of uneventful cesarean section provides obstetricians a safe postoperative and postpartum period after following standardized surgical procedures in terms of hemorrhage and related complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":13892,"journal":{"name":"International journal of clinical and experimental medicine","volume":"8 11","pages":"21653-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4723965/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety of uneventful cesarean section in terms of hemorrhage.\",\"authors\":\"Serkan Bodur, Ismet Gun, Ozkan Ozdamar, Mustafa Alparslan Babayigit\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Hemorrhage still continues to be reported as one of the leading causes of maternal mortality and morbidity. Intraoperative estimation of the blood loss seems to be complex and misleading as it is impaired by the amount of amniotic fluid and blood from the placenta. The present study was aimed to investigate the safety of intraoperative deciding on an uneventful cesarean section in a low risk patient population.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>One hundred patients free from hemorrhage risks and experienced an uneventful elective cesarean section, were included to the study. The decline in hemoglobin and hematocrit values, calculated blood loss, transfusion rate and presence of hemorrhage related symptoms and signs were accepted as the main outcomes of the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin values were detected as 12.09±0.18 g/dl and 10.72±1.39 g/dl, respectively. The average decrease in hemoglobin was 1.36±1.06 g/dl. The observed decrease in hemoglobin values were less than 10% in 34.4% of the patients. The average blood loss was calculated to be 517.06±417.55 ml. There were no patients with signs and symptoms of hemorrhage. Cross match transfusion ratio, transfusion probability and transfusion index was calculated as zero.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The decision of uneventful cesarean section provides obstetricians a safe postoperative and postpartum period after following standardized surgical procedures in terms of hemorrhage and related complications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of clinical and experimental medicine\",\"volume\":\"8 11\",\"pages\":\"21653-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4723965/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of clinical and experimental medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2015/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of clinical and experimental medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:据报道,大出血仍是导致孕产妇死亡和发病的主要原因之一。术中对失血量的估计似乎很复杂,而且会受到羊水量和胎盘血量的影响而产生误导。本研究旨在调查在低风险患者群体中对无意外剖宫产手术进行术中判定的安全性:研究对象包括 100 名无大出血风险且经历过顺利选择性剖宫产的患者。将血红蛋白和血细胞比容值的下降、计算的失血量、输血率以及是否出现与出血相关的症状和体征作为研究的主要结果:术前和术后血红蛋白平均值分别为 12.09±0.18 g/dl 和 10.72±1.39 g/dl。血红蛋白平均下降了 1.36±1.06 g/dl。在 34.4% 的患者中,观察到的血红蛋白下降值低于 10%。经计算,平均失血量为 517.06±417.55 毫升。没有患者出现出血症状和体征。交叉匹配输血比、输血概率和输血指数均为零:就出血和相关并发症而言,无痛剖宫产术为产科医生提供了一个遵循标准化手术流程的安全术后和产后时期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Safety of uneventful cesarean section in terms of hemorrhage.

Objective: Hemorrhage still continues to be reported as one of the leading causes of maternal mortality and morbidity. Intraoperative estimation of the blood loss seems to be complex and misleading as it is impaired by the amount of amniotic fluid and blood from the placenta. The present study was aimed to investigate the safety of intraoperative deciding on an uneventful cesarean section in a low risk patient population.

Material and methods: One hundred patients free from hemorrhage risks and experienced an uneventful elective cesarean section, were included to the study. The decline in hemoglobin and hematocrit values, calculated blood loss, transfusion rate and presence of hemorrhage related symptoms and signs were accepted as the main outcomes of the study.

Results: The average preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin values were detected as 12.09±0.18 g/dl and 10.72±1.39 g/dl, respectively. The average decrease in hemoglobin was 1.36±1.06 g/dl. The observed decrease in hemoglobin values were less than 10% in 34.4% of the patients. The average blood loss was calculated to be 517.06±417.55 ml. There were no patients with signs and symptoms of hemorrhage. Cross match transfusion ratio, transfusion probability and transfusion index was calculated as zero.

Conclusion: The decision of uneventful cesarean section provides obstetricians a safe postoperative and postpartum period after following standardized surgical procedures in terms of hemorrhage and related complications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
A case report of moderate COVID-19 with an extremely long-term viral shedding period in China Lentivirus-Mediated knockdown of tectonic family member 1 inhibits medulloblastoma cell proliferation [Retraction]. Classification of MRI and psychological testing data based on support vector machine. Nucleostemin regulates proliferation and migration of gastric cancer and correlates with its malignancy [Retraction]. Effect of lipiodol and methylene blue on the thoracoscopic preoperative positioning [Retraction].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1