首次癫痫发作门诊的早期就诊、后续疗效以及就诊相关因素。

IF 20.4 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY JAMA neurology Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.1187
Yingtong Li, Tianrui Ren, Michael Burgess, Zhibin Chen, Patrick W Carney, Terence J O'Brien, Patrick Kwan, Emma Foster
{"title":"首次癫痫发作门诊的早期就诊、后续疗效以及就诊相关因素。","authors":"Yingtong Li, Tianrui Ren, Michael Burgess, Zhibin Chen, Patrick W Carney, Terence J O'Brien, Patrick Kwan, Emma Foster","doi":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.1187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>First-seizure clinics (FSCs) aim to deliver prompt specialist care to patients with new-onset undifferentiated seizure events.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether FSC attendance and time to FSC are associated with subsequent health care utilization and mortality and to investigate factors associated with FSC nonattendance.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This was a record-linkage, retrospective, cohort study of patients who booked appointments at 2 FSCs between 2007 and 2018. Patients' records were linked to state-wide administrative databases between 2000 and 2021. The setting comprised the FSCs of 2 major metropolitan public hospitals in Melbourne, Australia, providing national inpatient and outpatient adult epilepsy services. Of patients who booked appointments at the FSCs, those who were successfully linked for analysis were included in the study. Patients who recorded only canceled appointments were excluded from analysis of outcomes. Study data were analyzed from January 2000 to December 2021.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>FSC attendance.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Subsequent all-cause and seizure-related emergency department (ED) presentations and hospital admissions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 10 162 patients with appointments at FSCs, 9392 were linked for analysis, with mean (SD) follow-up time 6.9 (2.8) years after FSC referral. A total of 703 patients were excluded. Among 9392 linked patients, 5398 were male (57.5%; mean [SD] age, 59.7 [11.2] years). FSC attendance was associated with reduced subsequent all-cause emergency presentations (adjusted incidence rate ratio [aIRR], 0.72; 95% CI, 0.66-0.79) and all-cause hospitalization (aIRR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.75-0.88). Those who attended at the first-scheduled appointment, compared with those who attended only a rescheduled, delayed appointment, had reduced subsequent all-cause emergency presentations (aIRR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.76-0.91), all-cause hospitalization (aIRR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.65-0.79), seizure-related presentations (aIRR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.33-0.49), and mortality (hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.69-0.98). Male sex was associated with nonattendance (adjusted relative risk [aRR], 1.12; 95% CI, 1.03-1.22), as were injury at emergency presentation (aRR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.01-1.24), psychiatric comorbidity (aRR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.55-1.81), previous seizure-related presentations (aRR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.22-1.49), and delays (>14 days) between FSC referral and appointment (aRR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.18-1.54). Hospitalization at referral was associated with reduced nonattendance (aRR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.72-0.90), as were non-English language preference (aRR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.69-0.94), distance greater than 6 mi from home to clinic (aRR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.76-0.95), and physical comorbidity (aRR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.72-0.89).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Results of this cohort study suggest that FSC attendance, particularly early attendance, was associated with reduced rates of subsequent hospital utilization. This knowledge may support adequately resourcing FSCs to improve equitable, timely access. Future study directions include assessing interventions that may support FSC attendance for at-risk groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":14677,"journal":{"name":"JAMA neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":20.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11117147/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early Access to First-Seizure Clinics, Subsequent Outcomes, and Factors Associated With Attendance.\",\"authors\":\"Yingtong Li, Tianrui Ren, Michael Burgess, Zhibin Chen, Patrick W Carney, Terence J O'Brien, Patrick Kwan, Emma Foster\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.1187\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>First-seizure clinics (FSCs) aim to deliver prompt specialist care to patients with new-onset undifferentiated seizure events.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether FSC attendance and time to FSC are associated with subsequent health care utilization and mortality and to investigate factors associated with FSC nonattendance.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This was a record-linkage, retrospective, cohort study of patients who booked appointments at 2 FSCs between 2007 and 2018. Patients' records were linked to state-wide administrative databases between 2000 and 2021. The setting comprised the FSCs of 2 major metropolitan public hospitals in Melbourne, Australia, providing national inpatient and outpatient adult epilepsy services. Of patients who booked appointments at the FSCs, those who were successfully linked for analysis were included in the study. Patients who recorded only canceled appointments were excluded from analysis of outcomes. Study data were analyzed from January 2000 to December 2021.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>FSC attendance.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Subsequent all-cause and seizure-related emergency department (ED) presentations and hospital admissions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 10 162 patients with appointments at FSCs, 9392 were linked for analysis, with mean (SD) follow-up time 6.9 (2.8) years after FSC referral. A total of 703 patients were excluded. Among 9392 linked patients, 5398 were male (57.5%; mean [SD] age, 59.7 [11.2] years). FSC attendance was associated with reduced subsequent all-cause emergency presentations (adjusted incidence rate ratio [aIRR], 0.72; 95% CI, 0.66-0.79) and all-cause hospitalization (aIRR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.75-0.88). Those who attended at the first-scheduled appointment, compared with those who attended only a rescheduled, delayed appointment, had reduced subsequent all-cause emergency presentations (aIRR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.76-0.91), all-cause hospitalization (aIRR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.65-0.79), seizure-related presentations (aIRR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.33-0.49), and mortality (hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.69-0.98). Male sex was associated with nonattendance (adjusted relative risk [aRR], 1.12; 95% CI, 1.03-1.22), as were injury at emergency presentation (aRR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.01-1.24), psychiatric comorbidity (aRR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.55-1.81), previous seizure-related presentations (aRR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.22-1.49), and delays (>14 days) between FSC referral and appointment (aRR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.18-1.54). Hospitalization at referral was associated with reduced nonattendance (aRR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.72-0.90), as were non-English language preference (aRR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.69-0.94), distance greater than 6 mi from home to clinic (aRR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.76-0.95), and physical comorbidity (aRR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.72-0.89).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Results of this cohort study suggest that FSC attendance, particularly early attendance, was associated with reduced rates of subsequent hospital utilization. This knowledge may support adequately resourcing FSCs to improve equitable, timely access. Future study directions include assessing interventions that may support FSC attendance for at-risk groups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14677,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMA neurology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":20.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11117147/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMA neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.1187\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.1187","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:首次癫痫发作门诊(FSC)旨在为新发无差别癫痫发作患者提供及时的专科治疗:确定首次发作门诊的就诊率和就诊时间是否与随后的医疗服务使用率和死亡率相关,并调查与未就诊首次发作门诊相关的因素:这是一项记录链接、回顾性队列研究,研究对象是 2007 年至 2018 年期间在 2 家家庭服务中心预约的患者。患者的记录与 2000 年至 2021 年间的全州行政数据库进行了链接。研究地点包括澳大利亚墨尔本两家大型都市公立医院的家庭服务中心,这两家医院提供全国性的成人癫痫住院和门诊服务。在家庭服务中心预约就诊的患者中,成功连接以进行分析的患者被纳入研究范围。仅有取消预约记录的患者不纳入结果分析。研究数据分析时间为2000年1月至2021年12月:主要结果和测量指标主要结果和测量指标:随后的全因和发作相关急诊科(ED)就诊和入院情况:结果:在10 162名预约到家庭服务中心就诊的患者中,有9392人被纳入分析范围,平均(标度)随访时间为家庭服务中心转诊后的6.9(2.8)年。共有 703 名患者被排除在外。在 9392 名关联患者中,5398 人为男性(57.5%;平均 [SD] 年龄为 59.7 [11.2] 岁)。到家庭服务中心就诊可减少随后的全因急诊就诊率(调整后发病率比 [aIRR],0.72;95% CI,0.66-0.79)和全因住院率(aIRR,0.81;95% CI,0.75-0.88)。与只参加重新安排的延迟预约的患者相比,在首次预约时就诊的患者减少了随后的全因急诊就诊率(aIRR,0.83;95% CI,0.76-0.91)、全因住院率(aIRR,0.71;95% CI,0.65-0.79)、癫痫发作相关就诊率(aIRR,0.40;95% CI,0.33-0.49)和死亡率(危险比,0.82;95% CI,0.69-0.98)。男性性别与不就诊相关(调整后相对风险 [aRR],1.12;95% CI,1.03-1.22),急诊就诊时受伤(aRR,1.12;95% CI,1.01-1.24)、精神病合并症(aRR,1.68;95% CI,1.55-1.81)、既往癫痫发作相关病史(aRR,1.35;95% CI,1.22-1.49)以及家庭支持中心转诊与预约之间的延迟(>14 天)(aRR,1.35;95% CI,1.18-1.54)。转诊时住院与未就诊率降低有关(aRR,0.80;95% CI,0.72-0.90),与非英语语言偏好(aRR,0.81;95% CI,0.69-0.94)、从家庭到诊所的距离超过 6 英里(aRR,0.85;95% CI,0.76-0.95)和身体合并症(aRR,0.80;95% CI,0.72-0.89)也有关:这项队列研究的结果表明,参加家庭支持中心,尤其是尽早参加,与随后的住院率降低有关。这方面的知识可能有助于为家庭服务中心提供充足的资源,以改善公平、及时的就医环境。未来的研究方向包括评估可支持高危人群参加家庭服务中心的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Early Access to First-Seizure Clinics, Subsequent Outcomes, and Factors Associated With Attendance.

Importance: First-seizure clinics (FSCs) aim to deliver prompt specialist care to patients with new-onset undifferentiated seizure events.

Objective: To determine whether FSC attendance and time to FSC are associated with subsequent health care utilization and mortality and to investigate factors associated with FSC nonattendance.

Design, setting, and participants: This was a record-linkage, retrospective, cohort study of patients who booked appointments at 2 FSCs between 2007 and 2018. Patients' records were linked to state-wide administrative databases between 2000 and 2021. The setting comprised the FSCs of 2 major metropolitan public hospitals in Melbourne, Australia, providing national inpatient and outpatient adult epilepsy services. Of patients who booked appointments at the FSCs, those who were successfully linked for analysis were included in the study. Patients who recorded only canceled appointments were excluded from analysis of outcomes. Study data were analyzed from January 2000 to December 2021.

Exposure: FSC attendance.

Main outcomes and measures: Subsequent all-cause and seizure-related emergency department (ED) presentations and hospital admissions.

Results: Of 10 162 patients with appointments at FSCs, 9392 were linked for analysis, with mean (SD) follow-up time 6.9 (2.8) years after FSC referral. A total of 703 patients were excluded. Among 9392 linked patients, 5398 were male (57.5%; mean [SD] age, 59.7 [11.2] years). FSC attendance was associated with reduced subsequent all-cause emergency presentations (adjusted incidence rate ratio [aIRR], 0.72; 95% CI, 0.66-0.79) and all-cause hospitalization (aIRR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.75-0.88). Those who attended at the first-scheduled appointment, compared with those who attended only a rescheduled, delayed appointment, had reduced subsequent all-cause emergency presentations (aIRR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.76-0.91), all-cause hospitalization (aIRR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.65-0.79), seizure-related presentations (aIRR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.33-0.49), and mortality (hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.69-0.98). Male sex was associated with nonattendance (adjusted relative risk [aRR], 1.12; 95% CI, 1.03-1.22), as were injury at emergency presentation (aRR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.01-1.24), psychiatric comorbidity (aRR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.55-1.81), previous seizure-related presentations (aRR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.22-1.49), and delays (>14 days) between FSC referral and appointment (aRR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.18-1.54). Hospitalization at referral was associated with reduced nonattendance (aRR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.72-0.90), as were non-English language preference (aRR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.69-0.94), distance greater than 6 mi from home to clinic (aRR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.76-0.95), and physical comorbidity (aRR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.72-0.89).

Conclusions and relevance: Results of this cohort study suggest that FSC attendance, particularly early attendance, was associated with reduced rates of subsequent hospital utilization. This knowledge may support adequately resourcing FSCs to improve equitable, timely access. Future study directions include assessing interventions that may support FSC attendance for at-risk groups.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA neurology
JAMA neurology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
41.90
自引率
1.70%
发文量
250
期刊介绍: JAMA Neurology is an international peer-reviewed journal for physicians caring for people with neurologic disorders and those interested in the structure and function of the normal and diseased nervous system. The Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry began publication in 1919 and, in 1959, became 2 separate journals: Archives of Neurology and Archives of General Psychiatry. In 2013, their names changed to JAMA Neurology and JAMA Psychiatry, respectively. JAMA Neurology is a member of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications.
期刊最新文献
Comorbidity and Disease Activity in Multiple Sclerosis How Is the X Chromosome Involved in Alzheimer Disease? Role of the X Chromosome in Alzheimer Disease Genetics. Updated Multiple Sclerosis Incidence, 2015-2022. A Unique Case of Opioid-Induced Myoclonus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1