焦虑唤醒与使用虚拟现实正念和两种加速经颅磁刺激方案治疗精神障碍的关系。

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Journal of Clinical Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-05-22 DOI:10.4088/JCP.23m15195
Austin M Spitz, Megan C Senda, Kevin A Johnson, Isabelle M Taylor, Mariah M Jensen, F Andrew Kozel
{"title":"焦虑唤醒与使用虚拟现实正念和两种加速经颅磁刺激方案治疗精神障碍的关系。","authors":"Austin M Spitz, Megan C Senda, Kevin A Johnson, Isabelle M Taylor, Mariah M Jensen, F Andrew Kozel","doi":"10.4088/JCP.23m15195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This secondary analysis investigated the relationship of anxious arousal, as measured by the Tension Anxiety subscale of the Profile of Mood States (TA-POMS), to treatment outcome across diagnoses for each phase of the study. Sequential treatment phases of virtual reality (VR) mindfulness followed by left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) accelerated transcranial magnetic stimulation (accel-TMS) and then dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC) accel-TMS were used to treat dysphoria across diagnoses in an open trial from September 2021 to August 2023.</p><p><p><b>Methods:</b> The change in the TA-POMS subscale was compared to the percent change in primary clinician scale scores using a bivariate analysis. Baseline TA-POMS subscales were compared to treatment response using linear regression models to assess anxious arousal's impact on treatment outcome for the 3 phases. Significance was defined as <i>P</i> < .05, 2-tailed.</p><p><p><b>Results:</b> Twenty-three participants were enrolled in VR mindfulness, 19 in left dlPFC accel-TMS, and 12 in dmPFC accel TMS. Although the change in TA-POMS scores did not significantly correlate with the percent change in primary clinician scale ratings for the VR phase, they did for both the dlPFC (<i>P</i> = .041) and the dmPFC (<i>P</i> = .003) accel-TMS treatment phases. Importantly, baseline anxious arousal levels as measured by TA-POMS were not predictive of treatment outcome in any treatment phase.</p><p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> The outcome of accel-TMS treatment was not adversely affected by anxious arousal and similarly improved along with primary rating scales.</p><p><p><b>Trial Registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05061745.</p>","PeriodicalId":50234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Relationship of Anxious Arousal With Treatment of Dysphoria Using Virtual Reality Mindfulness and 2 Accelerated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Protocols.\",\"authors\":\"Austin M Spitz, Megan C Senda, Kevin A Johnson, Isabelle M Taylor, Mariah M Jensen, F Andrew Kozel\",\"doi\":\"10.4088/JCP.23m15195\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This secondary analysis investigated the relationship of anxious arousal, as measured by the Tension Anxiety subscale of the Profile of Mood States (TA-POMS), to treatment outcome across diagnoses for each phase of the study. Sequential treatment phases of virtual reality (VR) mindfulness followed by left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) accelerated transcranial magnetic stimulation (accel-TMS) and then dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC) accel-TMS were used to treat dysphoria across diagnoses in an open trial from September 2021 to August 2023.</p><p><p><b>Methods:</b> The change in the TA-POMS subscale was compared to the percent change in primary clinician scale scores using a bivariate analysis. Baseline TA-POMS subscales were compared to treatment response using linear regression models to assess anxious arousal's impact on treatment outcome for the 3 phases. Significance was defined as <i>P</i> < .05, 2-tailed.</p><p><p><b>Results:</b> Twenty-three participants were enrolled in VR mindfulness, 19 in left dlPFC accel-TMS, and 12 in dmPFC accel TMS. Although the change in TA-POMS scores did not significantly correlate with the percent change in primary clinician scale ratings for the VR phase, they did for both the dlPFC (<i>P</i> = .041) and the dmPFC (<i>P</i> = .003) accel-TMS treatment phases. Importantly, baseline anxious arousal levels as measured by TA-POMS were not predictive of treatment outcome in any treatment phase.</p><p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> The outcome of accel-TMS treatment was not adversely affected by anxious arousal and similarly improved along with primary rating scales.</p><p><p><b>Trial Registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05061745.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.23m15195\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.23m15195","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的这项二次分析调查了情绪状态档案(TA-POMS)紧张焦虑分量表所测量的焦虑唤醒与该研究各阶段不同诊断的治疗结果之间的关系。在2021年9月至2023年8月的一项开放性试验中,采用虚拟现实(VR)正念,然后是左侧背外侧前额叶皮层(dlPFC)加速经颅磁刺激(accel-TMS),最后是背内侧前额叶皮层(dmPFC)加速经颅磁刺激(accel-TMS)的顺序治疗阶段来治疗不同诊断的焦虑症:通过双变量分析,将TA-POMS分量表的变化与主要临床医生量表评分的百分比变化进行比较。使用线性回归模型将基线TA-POMS分量表与治疗反应进行比较,以评估焦虑唤醒对3个阶段治疗结果的影响。结果:23名参与者参加了VR正念治疗,19名参与者参加了左侧大脑皮质加速TMS治疗,12名参与者参加了右侧大脑皮质加速TMS治疗。虽然在VR阶段,TA-POMS评分的变化与主要临床医生量表评分的百分比变化并无显著相关性,但在dlPFC(P = .041)和dmPFC(P = .003)加速TMS治疗阶段,TA-POMS评分的变化与主要临床医生量表评分的百分比变化却有显著相关性。重要的是,TA-POMS测量的基线焦虑唤醒水平对任何治疗阶段的治疗结果都没有预测作用:结论:加速经颅磁刺激疗法的疗效不会受到焦虑唤醒的不利影响,而且随着主要评分量表的提高,疗效也同样有所改善:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov identifier:NCT05061745。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Relationship of Anxious Arousal With Treatment of Dysphoria Using Virtual Reality Mindfulness and 2 Accelerated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Protocols.

Objective: This secondary analysis investigated the relationship of anxious arousal, as measured by the Tension Anxiety subscale of the Profile of Mood States (TA-POMS), to treatment outcome across diagnoses for each phase of the study. Sequential treatment phases of virtual reality (VR) mindfulness followed by left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) accelerated transcranial magnetic stimulation (accel-TMS) and then dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC) accel-TMS were used to treat dysphoria across diagnoses in an open trial from September 2021 to August 2023.

Methods: The change in the TA-POMS subscale was compared to the percent change in primary clinician scale scores using a bivariate analysis. Baseline TA-POMS subscales were compared to treatment response using linear regression models to assess anxious arousal's impact on treatment outcome for the 3 phases. Significance was defined as P < .05, 2-tailed.

Results: Twenty-three participants were enrolled in VR mindfulness, 19 in left dlPFC accel-TMS, and 12 in dmPFC accel TMS. Although the change in TA-POMS scores did not significantly correlate with the percent change in primary clinician scale ratings for the VR phase, they did for both the dlPFC (P = .041) and the dmPFC (P = .003) accel-TMS treatment phases. Importantly, baseline anxious arousal levels as measured by TA-POMS were not predictive of treatment outcome in any treatment phase.

Conclusion: The outcome of accel-TMS treatment was not adversely affected by anxious arousal and similarly improved along with primary rating scales.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05061745.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: For over 75 years, The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry has been a leading source of peer-reviewed articles offering the latest information on mental health topics to psychiatrists and other medical professionals.The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry is the leading psychiatric resource for clinical information and covers disorders including depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, anxiety, addiction, posttraumatic stress disorder, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder while exploring the newest advances in diagnosis and treatment.
期刊最新文献
Efficacy and Safety of Ketamine/Esketamine in Bipolar Depression in a Clinical Setting. Integrating Previous Suicide Attempts, Gender, and Age Into Suicide Risk Assessment Using Advanced Artificial Intelligence Models. Long-Term Changes in Cognition Among Patients With Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders and Different Durations of Illness: A Meta-Analysis. Regression: Understanding What Covariates and Confounds Do in Adjusted Analyses. Diagnostic Assessment via Live Telehealth (Phone or Video) Versus Face-to-Face for the Diagnoses of Psychiatric Conditions: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1