高频经颅磁刺激治疗双相抑郁症的试点研究。

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Journal of Clinical Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-05-20 DOI:10.4088/JCP.23m15056
Scott T Aaronson, Eric L Goldwaser, Paul E Croarkin, Jennifer R Geske, Allison LeMahieu, Jennifer H Sklar, Simon Kung
{"title":"高频经颅磁刺激治疗双相抑郁症的试点研究。","authors":"Scott T Aaronson, Eric L Goldwaser, Paul E Croarkin, Jennifer R Geske, Allison LeMahieu, Jennifer H Sklar, Simon Kung","doi":"10.4088/JCP.23m15056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a standard treatment approach for major depressive disorder. There is growing clinical experience to support the use of high-frequency left-sided rTMS in bipolar depression. This study collected open-label safety and effectiveness data in a sample of patients with bipolar depression.</p><p><p><b>Methods:</b> Thirty-one adults (13 male/ 18 female; mean age: 42.2 [14.3] years) with bipolar (I or II) depression verified by <i>DSM-5</i> criteria were recruited at Sheppard Pratt and Mayo Clinic between August 2017 and February 2020 for rTMS. Standardized treatment protocols employed 6 weeks of 10-Hz rTMS to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex at 120% of motor threshold with 3,000 pulses per session in 4-second trains with intertrain intervals of 26 seconds. All patients were treated concurrently with a mood stabilizer. The primary outcome measure was the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). Response and remission were defined as MADRS score reductions of ≥50% or score <10, respectively. We examined response, remission, and potential contributing factors with multivariate and logistic regression models.</p><p><p><b>Results:</b> The majority of patients with bipolar depression reached response (n = 27; 87.1%) and remission (n = 23; 74.2%). Older age and concurrent treatment with lithium were associated with higher MADRS scores throughout the treatment course (0.1 ± 0.05, <i>P</i> =.05; 4.05 ± 1.27, <i>P</i> = .003, respectively). Concurrent treatment with lamotrigine was associated with lower MADRS scores (-3.48 ± 1.26, <i>P</i> = .01). Treatment with rTMS was safe and well tolerated. There were no completed suicides, induced manic episodes, or other serious adverse events.</p><p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> Although preliminary, the present findings are encouraging regarding the safety and effectiveness of 10-Hz rTMS for bipolar depression.</p><p><p><b>Trial Registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02640950.</p>","PeriodicalId":50234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Pilot Study of High-Frequency Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Bipolar Depression.\",\"authors\":\"Scott T Aaronson, Eric L Goldwaser, Paul E Croarkin, Jennifer R Geske, Allison LeMahieu, Jennifer H Sklar, Simon Kung\",\"doi\":\"10.4088/JCP.23m15056\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a standard treatment approach for major depressive disorder. There is growing clinical experience to support the use of high-frequency left-sided rTMS in bipolar depression. This study collected open-label safety and effectiveness data in a sample of patients with bipolar depression.</p><p><p><b>Methods:</b> Thirty-one adults (13 male/ 18 female; mean age: 42.2 [14.3] years) with bipolar (I or II) depression verified by <i>DSM-5</i> criteria were recruited at Sheppard Pratt and Mayo Clinic between August 2017 and February 2020 for rTMS. Standardized treatment protocols employed 6 weeks of 10-Hz rTMS to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex at 120% of motor threshold with 3,000 pulses per session in 4-second trains with intertrain intervals of 26 seconds. All patients were treated concurrently with a mood stabilizer. The primary outcome measure was the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). Response and remission were defined as MADRS score reductions of ≥50% or score <10, respectively. We examined response, remission, and potential contributing factors with multivariate and logistic regression models.</p><p><p><b>Results:</b> The majority of patients with bipolar depression reached response (n = 27; 87.1%) and remission (n = 23; 74.2%). Older age and concurrent treatment with lithium were associated with higher MADRS scores throughout the treatment course (0.1 ± 0.05, <i>P</i> =.05; 4.05 ± 1.27, <i>P</i> = .003, respectively). Concurrent treatment with lamotrigine was associated with lower MADRS scores (-3.48 ± 1.26, <i>P</i> = .01). Treatment with rTMS was safe and well tolerated. There were no completed suicides, induced manic episodes, or other serious adverse events.</p><p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> Although preliminary, the present findings are encouraging regarding the safety and effectiveness of 10-Hz rTMS for bipolar depression.</p><p><p><b>Trial Registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02640950.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.23m15056\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.23m15056","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)是治疗重度抑郁症的标准方法。越来越多的临床经验支持在双相抑郁症中使用高频左侧经颅磁刺激。本研究收集了双相抑郁症患者样本中的开放标签安全性和有效性数据:2017年8月至2020年2月期间,谢帕德普拉特和梅奥诊所招募了31名经DSM-5标准验证的双相(I或II)抑郁症成人(13名男性/18名女性;平均年龄:42.2 [14.3]岁)接受经颅磁刺激治疗。标准化治疗方案对左侧背外侧前额叶皮层进行为期6周的10赫兹经颅磁刺激,频率为运动阈值的120%,每次治疗3,000个脉冲,每组4秒,组间间隔26秒。所有患者均同时接受情绪稳定剂治疗。主要结果测量指标为蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁量表(MADRS)。MADRS评分降低≥50%或评分结果为应答和缓解:大多数双相抑郁症患者达到了应答(n = 27;87.1%)和缓解(n = 23;74.2%)。在整个治疗过程中,年龄较大和同时接受锂治疗与较高的 MADRS 评分有关(分别为 0.1 ± 0.05,P =.05;4.05 ± 1.27,P = .003)。同时使用拉莫三嗪治疗的患者 MADRS 评分较低(-3.48 ± 1.26,P = .01)。经颅磁刺激治疗安全且耐受性良好。没有发生自杀、诱发躁狂发作或其他严重不良事件:尽管是初步研究,但目前的研究结果令人鼓舞,说明 10 赫兹经颅磁刺激治疗双相抑郁症是安全有效的:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov identifier:NCT02640950。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Pilot Study of High-Frequency Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Bipolar Depression.

Objective: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a standard treatment approach for major depressive disorder. There is growing clinical experience to support the use of high-frequency left-sided rTMS in bipolar depression. This study collected open-label safety and effectiveness data in a sample of patients with bipolar depression.

Methods: Thirty-one adults (13 male/ 18 female; mean age: 42.2 [14.3] years) with bipolar (I or II) depression verified by DSM-5 criteria were recruited at Sheppard Pratt and Mayo Clinic between August 2017 and February 2020 for rTMS. Standardized treatment protocols employed 6 weeks of 10-Hz rTMS to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex at 120% of motor threshold with 3,000 pulses per session in 4-second trains with intertrain intervals of 26 seconds. All patients were treated concurrently with a mood stabilizer. The primary outcome measure was the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). Response and remission were defined as MADRS score reductions of ≥50% or score <10, respectively. We examined response, remission, and potential contributing factors with multivariate and logistic regression models.

Results: The majority of patients with bipolar depression reached response (n = 27; 87.1%) and remission (n = 23; 74.2%). Older age and concurrent treatment with lithium were associated with higher MADRS scores throughout the treatment course (0.1 ± 0.05, P =.05; 4.05 ± 1.27, P = .003, respectively). Concurrent treatment with lamotrigine was associated with lower MADRS scores (-3.48 ± 1.26, P = .01). Treatment with rTMS was safe and well tolerated. There were no completed suicides, induced manic episodes, or other serious adverse events.

Conclusion: Although preliminary, the present findings are encouraging regarding the safety and effectiveness of 10-Hz rTMS for bipolar depression.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02640950.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: For over 75 years, The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry has been a leading source of peer-reviewed articles offering the latest information on mental health topics to psychiatrists and other medical professionals.The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry is the leading psychiatric resource for clinical information and covers disorders including depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, anxiety, addiction, posttraumatic stress disorder, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder while exploring the newest advances in diagnosis and treatment.
期刊最新文献
Efficacy and Safety of Ketamine/Esketamine in Bipolar Depression in a Clinical Setting. Integrating Previous Suicide Attempts, Gender, and Age Into Suicide Risk Assessment Using Advanced Artificial Intelligence Models. Long-Term Changes in Cognition Among Patients With Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders and Different Durations of Illness: A Meta-Analysis. Regression: Understanding What Covariates and Confounds Do in Adjusted Analyses. Diagnostic Assessment via Live Telehealth (Phone or Video) Versus Face-to-Face for the Diagnoses of Psychiatric Conditions: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1