Mark McCann, Federica Bianchi, Srebrenka Letina, Samantha Stewart, Katy McLeod, Mark Tranmer
{"title":"采用社会网络分析方法评估 COVID19 对苏格兰吸毒者药物使用治疗和非正式社会交往的干扰。","authors":"Mark McCann, Federica Bianchi, Srebrenka Letina, Samantha Stewart, Katy McLeod, Mark Tranmer","doi":"10.1186/s13722-024-00469-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To assess the extent of Coronavirus-related disruption to health and social care treatment and social interactions among people with lived or living experience of substance use in Scotland, and explore potential reasons for variations in disruption.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross sectional mixed methods interview, incorporating a social network 'egonet interview' approach asking about whether participants had interactions with a range of substance use, health, social care or third sector organisations, or informal social interactions.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Five Alcohol and Drug Partnership Areas in Scotland.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>57 (42% women) participants were involved in the study, on average 42 years old.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Five-point Likert scale reporting whether interactions with a range of services and people had gotten much better, better, no different (or no change), worse, or much worse since COVID19 and lockdown. Ratings were nested within participants (Individuals provided multiple ratings) and some ratings were also nested within treatment service (services received multiple ratings). The nested structure was accounted for using cross classified ordinal logistic multilevel models.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>While the overall average suggested only a slight negative change in interactions (mean rating 2.93), there were substantial variations according to type of interaction, and between individuals. Reported change was more often negative for mental health services (Adjusted OR = 0.93 95% CI 0.17,0.90), and positive for pharmacies (3.03 95% CI 1.36, 5.93). The models found between-participant variation of around 10%, and negligible between-service variation of around 1% in ratings. Ratings didn't vary by individual age or gender but there was variation between areas.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Substance use treatment service adaptations due to COVID19 lockdown led to both positive and negative service user experiences. Social network methods provide an effective way to describe complex system-wide interaction patterns, and to measure variations at the individual, service, and area level.</p>","PeriodicalId":54223,"journal":{"name":"Addiction Science & Clinical Practice","volume":"19 1","pages":"42"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11110318/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A social network analysis approach to assess COVID19-related disruption to substance use treatment and informal social interactions among people who use drugs in Scotland.\",\"authors\":\"Mark McCann, Federica Bianchi, Srebrenka Letina, Samantha Stewart, Katy McLeod, Mark Tranmer\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13722-024-00469-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To assess the extent of Coronavirus-related disruption to health and social care treatment and social interactions among people with lived or living experience of substance use in Scotland, and explore potential reasons for variations in disruption.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross sectional mixed methods interview, incorporating a social network 'egonet interview' approach asking about whether participants had interactions with a range of substance use, health, social care or third sector organisations, or informal social interactions.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Five Alcohol and Drug Partnership Areas in Scotland.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>57 (42% women) participants were involved in the study, on average 42 years old.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Five-point Likert scale reporting whether interactions with a range of services and people had gotten much better, better, no different (or no change), worse, or much worse since COVID19 and lockdown. Ratings were nested within participants (Individuals provided multiple ratings) and some ratings were also nested within treatment service (services received multiple ratings). The nested structure was accounted for using cross classified ordinal logistic multilevel models.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>While the overall average suggested only a slight negative change in interactions (mean rating 2.93), there were substantial variations according to type of interaction, and between individuals. Reported change was more often negative for mental health services (Adjusted OR = 0.93 95% CI 0.17,0.90), and positive for pharmacies (3.03 95% CI 1.36, 5.93). The models found between-participant variation of around 10%, and negligible between-service variation of around 1% in ratings. Ratings didn't vary by individual age or gender but there was variation between areas.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Substance use treatment service adaptations due to COVID19 lockdown led to both positive and negative service user experiences. Social network methods provide an effective way to describe complex system-wide interaction patterns, and to measure variations at the individual, service, and area level.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Addiction Science & Clinical Practice\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"42\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11110318/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Addiction Science & Clinical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13722-024-00469-3\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addiction Science & Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13722-024-00469-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:评估苏格兰有药物使用经历或生活经验的人群中与冠状病毒相关的健康和社会护理治疗及社会交往中断的程度,并探讨中断情况变化的潜在原因:设计:横断面混合方法访谈,采用社会网络 "egonet 访谈 "方法,询问参与者是否与一系列药物使用、医疗、社会护理或第三部门组织有互动,或是否有非正式的社会互动:环境:苏格兰的五个酒精和毒品合作区:57 名参与者(42% 为女性)参与了研究,平均年龄 42 岁:五点李克特量表,报告自 COVID19 和封锁以来,与一系列服务和人员的互动是否变得更好、更好、无差别(或无变化)、更差或更差。评分在参与者内部嵌套(个人提供多个评分),一些评分也在治疗服务内部嵌套(服务获得多个评分)。嵌套结构使用交叉分类序数逻辑多层次模型进行解释:虽然总体平均值仅表明互动中出现了轻微的负向变化(平均评分 2.93),但不同类型的互动以及不同个体之间的互动存在很大差异。心理健康服务的报告变化多为负面(调整后 OR = 0.93 95% CI 0.17,0.90),药房的报告变化多为正面(3.03 95% CI 1.36,5.93)。模型发现,参与者之间的评分差异约为 10%,服务之间的评分差异约为 1%,可以忽略不计。评分不因个人年龄或性别而异,但地区之间存在差异:结论:因 COVID19 封锁而对药物使用治疗服务进行的调整,既带来了积极的服务体验,也带来了消极的服务体验。社会网络方法为描述复杂的全系统互动模式以及衡量个人、服务和地区层面的变化提供了有效途径。
A social network analysis approach to assess COVID19-related disruption to substance use treatment and informal social interactions among people who use drugs in Scotland.
Aims: To assess the extent of Coronavirus-related disruption to health and social care treatment and social interactions among people with lived or living experience of substance use in Scotland, and explore potential reasons for variations in disruption.
Design: Cross sectional mixed methods interview, incorporating a social network 'egonet interview' approach asking about whether participants had interactions with a range of substance use, health, social care or third sector organisations, or informal social interactions.
Setting: Five Alcohol and Drug Partnership Areas in Scotland.
Participants: 57 (42% women) participants were involved in the study, on average 42 years old.
Measurements: Five-point Likert scale reporting whether interactions with a range of services and people had gotten much better, better, no different (or no change), worse, or much worse since COVID19 and lockdown. Ratings were nested within participants (Individuals provided multiple ratings) and some ratings were also nested within treatment service (services received multiple ratings). The nested structure was accounted for using cross classified ordinal logistic multilevel models.
Findings: While the overall average suggested only a slight negative change in interactions (mean rating 2.93), there were substantial variations according to type of interaction, and between individuals. Reported change was more often negative for mental health services (Adjusted OR = 0.93 95% CI 0.17,0.90), and positive for pharmacies (3.03 95% CI 1.36, 5.93). The models found between-participant variation of around 10%, and negligible between-service variation of around 1% in ratings. Ratings didn't vary by individual age or gender but there was variation between areas.
Conclusions: Substance use treatment service adaptations due to COVID19 lockdown led to both positive and negative service user experiences. Social network methods provide an effective way to describe complex system-wide interaction patterns, and to measure variations at the individual, service, and area level.
期刊介绍:
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice provides a forum for clinically relevant research and perspectives that contribute to improving the quality of care for people with unhealthy alcohol, tobacco, or other drug use and addictive behaviours across a spectrum of clinical settings.
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice accepts articles of clinical relevance related to the prevention and treatment of unhealthy alcohol, tobacco, and other drug use across the spectrum of clinical settings. Topics of interest address issues related to the following: the spectrum of unhealthy use of alcohol, tobacco, and other drugs among the range of affected persons (e.g., not limited by age, race/ethnicity, gender, or sexual orientation); the array of clinical prevention and treatment practices (from health messages, to identification and early intervention, to more extensive interventions including counseling and pharmacotherapy and other management strategies); and identification and management of medical, psychiatric, social, and other health consequences of substance use.
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice is particularly interested in articles that address how to improve the quality of care for people with unhealthy substance use and related conditions as described in the (US) Institute of Medicine report, Improving the Quality of Healthcare for Mental Health and Substance Use Conditions (Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2006). Such articles address the quality of care and of health services. Although the journal also welcomes submissions that address these conditions in addiction speciality-treatment settings, the journal is particularly interested in including articles that address unhealthy use outside these settings, including experience with novel models of care and outcomes, and outcomes of research-practice collaborations.
Although Addiction Science & Clinical Practice is generally not an outlet for basic science research, we will accept basic science research manuscripts that have clearly described potential clinical relevance and are accessible to audiences outside a narrow laboratory research field.