国际组织中的权力转移:中国在联合国

IF 2.2 3区 社会学 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Global Policy Pub Date : 2024-05-23 DOI:10.1111/1758-5899.13368
Sebastian Haug, Rosemary Foot, Max-Otto Baumann
{"title":"国际组织中的权力转移:中国在联合国","authors":"Sebastian Haug,&nbsp;Rosemary Foot,&nbsp;Max-Otto Baumann","doi":"10.1111/1758-5899.13368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The People's Republic of China is central to current debates about power shifts in international organisations, but a systematic and comprehensive assessment of China-related shifts has been missing. As Special Issue introduction, this article contributes to addressing this gap and examines whether, how and to what extent China-related power shifts have unfolded at the United Nations (UN) over the last two decades or so. We define power shifts as changes in the ability of actors to shape others' capacities to act and outline a framework that builds on Barnett and Duvall's four power types of compulsory, institutional, structural and productive power. Drawing from Special Issue contributions, our analysis covers empirical insights from the UN's three main pillars – peace and security, development and human rights – and paints an uneven picture. Despite continuing Western dominance, China is mobilising more compulsory power means than two decades ago. Chinese attempts to enact institutional power have also increased but mostly unfold in multilateral niches and remain cautious. While China's structural power position has expanded, China-related effects in productive power have so far remained limited and scattered. We conclude with a combined assessment of changes across power types and discuss research and policy implications.</p>","PeriodicalId":51510,"journal":{"name":"Global Policy","volume":"15 S2","pages":"5-17"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1758-5899.13368","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Power shifts in international organisations: China at the United Nations\",\"authors\":\"Sebastian Haug,&nbsp;Rosemary Foot,&nbsp;Max-Otto Baumann\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1758-5899.13368\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The People's Republic of China is central to current debates about power shifts in international organisations, but a systematic and comprehensive assessment of China-related shifts has been missing. As Special Issue introduction, this article contributes to addressing this gap and examines whether, how and to what extent China-related power shifts have unfolded at the United Nations (UN) over the last two decades or so. We define power shifts as changes in the ability of actors to shape others' capacities to act and outline a framework that builds on Barnett and Duvall's four power types of compulsory, institutional, structural and productive power. Drawing from Special Issue contributions, our analysis covers empirical insights from the UN's three main pillars – peace and security, development and human rights – and paints an uneven picture. Despite continuing Western dominance, China is mobilising more compulsory power means than two decades ago. Chinese attempts to enact institutional power have also increased but mostly unfold in multilateral niches and remain cautious. While China's structural power position has expanded, China-related effects in productive power have so far remained limited and scattered. We conclude with a combined assessment of changes across power types and discuss research and policy implications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51510,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Policy\",\"volume\":\"15 S2\",\"pages\":\"5-17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1758-5899.13368\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1758-5899.13368\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1758-5899.13368","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

中华人民共和国在当前有关国际组织权力转移的辩论中占据核心地位,但对与中国有关的权力转移一直缺乏系统而全面的评估。作为特刊导言,本文有助于填补这一空白,并探讨在过去二十年左右的时间里,联合国是否、如何以及在何种程度上发生了与中国相关的权力转移。我们将权力转移定义为行动者影响他人行动能力的变化,并以巴尼特(Barnett)和杜瓦尔(Duvall)提出的强制性权力、制度性权力、结构性权力和生产性权力四种权力类型为基础,勾勒出一个框架。我们的分析借鉴了特刊文章,涵盖了联合国三大支柱--和平与安全、发展和人权--的经验见解,描绘了一幅不平衡的图景。尽管西方继续占据主导地位,但与二十年前相比,中国正在动员更多的强制权力手段。中国在制度性权力方面的尝试也在增加,但大多是在多边领域展开,而且仍很谨慎。虽然中国的结构性权力地位有所扩大,但与中国相关的生产性权力效应迄今仍然有限且分散。最后,我们对各种权力类型的变化进行了综合评估,并讨论了研究和政策影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Power shifts in international organisations: China at the United Nations

The People's Republic of China is central to current debates about power shifts in international organisations, but a systematic and comprehensive assessment of China-related shifts has been missing. As Special Issue introduction, this article contributes to addressing this gap and examines whether, how and to what extent China-related power shifts have unfolded at the United Nations (UN) over the last two decades or so. We define power shifts as changes in the ability of actors to shape others' capacities to act and outline a framework that builds on Barnett and Duvall's four power types of compulsory, institutional, structural and productive power. Drawing from Special Issue contributions, our analysis covers empirical insights from the UN's three main pillars – peace and security, development and human rights – and paints an uneven picture. Despite continuing Western dominance, China is mobilising more compulsory power means than two decades ago. Chinese attempts to enact institutional power have also increased but mostly unfold in multilateral niches and remain cautious. While China's structural power position has expanded, China-related effects in productive power have so far remained limited and scattered. We conclude with a combined assessment of changes across power types and discuss research and policy implications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Policy
Global Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.50%
发文量
125
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Islamic Moral Economy: Bringing Back Substantive Morality to Humanise Islamic Finance Aligning Sustainable Finance and Fintech to Promote an Integrated Approach to Refugee Finance Islamic Instruments for Refugee Financing: The IsDB and UNHCR Collaborative Approach Financial Exclusion, Soft Segregation and Moral Constraints as Drivers of Entrepreneurial Activities in Scottish Muslim Immigrants
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1