比较洗必泰和聚维酮碘在预防手术后眼内炎方面的体外疗效。

Celso Soares Pereira Batista, Irene Loscos-Giménez, María Gámez, Raul Altaba, Daniela de Miniac, Neus Martí, Francisca Bassaganyas, Elena Juanes, Alba Rivera, Ferran Navarro
{"title":"比较洗必泰和聚维酮碘在预防手术后眼内炎方面的体外疗效。","authors":"Celso Soares Pereira Batista, Irene Loscos-Giménez, María Gámez, Raul Altaba, Daniela de Miniac, Neus Martí, Francisca Bassaganyas, Elena Juanes, Alba Rivera, Ferran Navarro","doi":"10.1186/s12348-024-00404-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intravitreal injections are a common ophthalmologic procedure. While infections following these injections are rare, they can lead to endophthalmitis, with potentially serious consequences. Various methods have been proposed to prevent endophthalmitis, including the use of antisepsis and antibiotics in patient preparation.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the antiseptic efficacy of aqueous chlorhexidine (CHX) and povidone-iodine (PI) when used alone and in combination with lidocaine gel (LG) in vitro.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two independent experimental trials were conducted. The first trial determined the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and the minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBCs) of CHX and PI against six bacterial strains. The second trial evaluated the bactericidal efficacy of the antiseptic agents (CHX 0.1% and PI 5%) and their combination with LG against the same bacterial strains.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CHX was more effective than PI in reducing the number of colonies forming units (cfus) of the tested bacteria. The order in which the antiseptic and LG were administered affected their effectiveness, with CHX administered before LG resulting in greater reduction of bacterial growth.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CHX 0.1% is more effective than PI 5% as an antiseptic agent. Application of CHX and PI prior to the use of lidocaine gel results in a more effective reduction of microorganisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":16600,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ophthalmic Inflammation and Infection","volume":"14 1","pages":"20"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11116284/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing the in vitro efficacy of chlorhexidine and povidone-iodine in the prevention of post-surgical endophthalmitis.\",\"authors\":\"Celso Soares Pereira Batista, Irene Loscos-Giménez, María Gámez, Raul Altaba, Daniela de Miniac, Neus Martí, Francisca Bassaganyas, Elena Juanes, Alba Rivera, Ferran Navarro\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12348-024-00404-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intravitreal injections are a common ophthalmologic procedure. While infections following these injections are rare, they can lead to endophthalmitis, with potentially serious consequences. Various methods have been proposed to prevent endophthalmitis, including the use of antisepsis and antibiotics in patient preparation.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the antiseptic efficacy of aqueous chlorhexidine (CHX) and povidone-iodine (PI) when used alone and in combination with lidocaine gel (LG) in vitro.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two independent experimental trials were conducted. The first trial determined the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and the minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBCs) of CHX and PI against six bacterial strains. The second trial evaluated the bactericidal efficacy of the antiseptic agents (CHX 0.1% and PI 5%) and their combination with LG against the same bacterial strains.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CHX was more effective than PI in reducing the number of colonies forming units (cfus) of the tested bacteria. The order in which the antiseptic and LG were administered affected their effectiveness, with CHX administered before LG resulting in greater reduction of bacterial growth.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CHX 0.1% is more effective than PI 5% as an antiseptic agent. Application of CHX and PI prior to the use of lidocaine gel results in a more effective reduction of microorganisms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16600,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Ophthalmic Inflammation and Infection\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11116284/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Ophthalmic Inflammation and Infection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12348-024-00404-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ophthalmic Inflammation and Infection","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12348-024-00404-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:玻璃体内注射是一种常见的眼科手术。虽然注射后发生感染的情况很少见,但却有可能导致眼内炎,造成潜在的严重后果。目的:评估水性洗必泰(CHX)和聚维酮碘(PI)在体外单独使用和与利多卡因凝胶(LG)联合使用时的杀菌效果:进行了两项独立的实验。第一项试验确定了 CHX 和 PI 对六种细菌菌株的最低抑菌浓度 (MIC) 和最低杀菌浓度 (MBC)。第二项试验评估了杀菌剂(CHX 0.1%和 PI 5%)及其与 LG 的组合对相同细菌菌株的杀菌效果:结果:在减少受测细菌的菌落形成单位数方面,CHX 比 PI 更有效。杀菌剂和 LG 的使用顺序会影响它们的效果,在 LG 之前使用 CHX 会更有效地减少细菌的生长:结论:作为一种防腐剂,0.1% CHX 比 5%PI 更有效。在使用利多卡因凝胶前使用 CHX 和 PI 能更有效地减少微生物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparing the in vitro efficacy of chlorhexidine and povidone-iodine in the prevention of post-surgical endophthalmitis.

Background: Intravitreal injections are a common ophthalmologic procedure. While infections following these injections are rare, they can lead to endophthalmitis, with potentially serious consequences. Various methods have been proposed to prevent endophthalmitis, including the use of antisepsis and antibiotics in patient preparation.

Purpose: To evaluate the antiseptic efficacy of aqueous chlorhexidine (CHX) and povidone-iodine (PI) when used alone and in combination with lidocaine gel (LG) in vitro.

Methods: Two independent experimental trials were conducted. The first trial determined the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and the minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBCs) of CHX and PI against six bacterial strains. The second trial evaluated the bactericidal efficacy of the antiseptic agents (CHX 0.1% and PI 5%) and their combination with LG against the same bacterial strains.

Results: CHX was more effective than PI in reducing the number of colonies forming units (cfus) of the tested bacteria. The order in which the antiseptic and LG were administered affected their effectiveness, with CHX administered before LG resulting in greater reduction of bacterial growth.

Conclusions: CHX 0.1% is more effective than PI 5% as an antiseptic agent. Application of CHX and PI prior to the use of lidocaine gel results in a more effective reduction of microorganisms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
3.40%
发文量
39
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Long-term effects of tocilizumab on retinal and choroidal inflammation in Birdshot uveitis. "Infectious uveitis: a comprehensive systematic review of emerging trends and molecular pathogenesis using network analysis". Isolated hydatid cyst in the medial rectus muscle: unveiling a rare orbital occurrence. Ocular loaiasis in France: the first case report from Brittany. Effect of intravitreal injection of anti-interleukin (IL)-6 antibody in experimental autoimmune uveitis in mice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1