利用全球标准和妇女自述经历,建立评估爱婴医院倡议合规性的方法。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Journal of Human Lactation Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-24 DOI:10.1177/08903344241252644
Laavanya Lokeesan, Elizabeth Martin, Yvette D Miller
{"title":"利用全球标准和妇女自述经历,建立评估爱婴医院倡议合规性的方法。","authors":"Laavanya Lokeesan, Elizabeth Martin, Yvette D Miller","doi":"10.1177/08903344241252644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The World Health Organization recommends assessing compliance with key clinical practices of the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI; Steps 3-9) using birthing women's self-reports. Globally, compliance is mainly assessed using health staff reports, and the use of women's self-reports in selected countries has deviated from the Global Standards for the BFHI. Therefore, we aimed to provide insight into the appropriate method of incorporating women's self-reports in assessing compliance with Steps 3-9 of the BFHI. We developed questions and coding algorithms for assessing compliance with Steps 3-9 based on Global Standards for BFHI compliance, and implemented them via a cross-sectional survey of 302 women who gave birth to a live baby in Sri Lankan hospitals. Compliance with specific practices within each of Steps 3-9 and overall compliance with each step were described as percentages. Compliance with specific practices and each BFHI Step ranged from 15.9%-100% and 7.0%-100%, respectively. Our findings particularly emphasize the potentially enhanced usefulness and robustness of assessing all specific practices within BFHI key clinical steps and not focusing only on one practice within a step, to derive more useful health service guidance globally for capturing BFHI compliance and its impact on breastfeeding outcomes. This method could be translated across multiple settings globally. It would enable more specific identification of care advancements required by health services to improve the effectiveness of breastfeeding support and address the prevailing undervaluing and under-use of women's experiential data to evaluate and guide health service improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":15948,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Lactation","volume":" ","pages":"405-412"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11340230/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Establishing Methods to Assess Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative Compliance Using the Global Standards and Women's Self-Reported Experiences.\",\"authors\":\"Laavanya Lokeesan, Elizabeth Martin, Yvette D Miller\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08903344241252644\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The World Health Organization recommends assessing compliance with key clinical practices of the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI; Steps 3-9) using birthing women's self-reports. Globally, compliance is mainly assessed using health staff reports, and the use of women's self-reports in selected countries has deviated from the Global Standards for the BFHI. Therefore, we aimed to provide insight into the appropriate method of incorporating women's self-reports in assessing compliance with Steps 3-9 of the BFHI. We developed questions and coding algorithms for assessing compliance with Steps 3-9 based on Global Standards for BFHI compliance, and implemented them via a cross-sectional survey of 302 women who gave birth to a live baby in Sri Lankan hospitals. Compliance with specific practices within each of Steps 3-9 and overall compliance with each step were described as percentages. Compliance with specific practices and each BFHI Step ranged from 15.9%-100% and 7.0%-100%, respectively. Our findings particularly emphasize the potentially enhanced usefulness and robustness of assessing all specific practices within BFHI key clinical steps and not focusing only on one practice within a step, to derive more useful health service guidance globally for capturing BFHI compliance and its impact on breastfeeding outcomes. This method could be translated across multiple settings globally. It would enable more specific identification of care advancements required by health services to improve the effectiveness of breastfeeding support and address the prevailing undervaluing and under-use of women's experiential data to evaluate and guide health service improvement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15948,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Human Lactation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"405-412\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11340230/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Human Lactation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08903344241252644\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Lactation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08903344241252644","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

世界卫生组织建议使用分娩妇女的自我报告来评估是否符合爱婴医院倡议(BFHI;步骤 3-9)的主要临床实践。在全球范围内,主要通过医务人员的报告来评估是否符合要求,而在某些国家,妇女自我报告的使用偏离了爱婴医院倡议的全球标准。因此,我们的目标是深入了解将妇女的自我报告纳入《基础保健倡议》步骤 3-9 合规性评估的适当方法。我们根据 BFHI 合规性全球标准制定了评估步骤 3-9 合规性的问题和编码算法,并通过对 302 名在斯里兰卡医院分娩活产婴儿的妇女进行横断面调查来实施。对步骤 3-9 中每一步骤的具体做法和每一步骤的总体遵守情况均以百分比的形式进行描述。具体操作和每个 BFHI 步骤的符合率分别为 15.9%-100% 和 7.0%-100%。我们的研究结果特别强调,评估母乳喂养倡议关键临床步骤中的所有具体做法,而不是只关注一个步骤中的一种做法,可能会提高其实用性和稳健性,从而在全球范围内获得更有用的健康服务指导,以掌握母乳喂养倡议的合规性及其对母乳喂养结果的影响。这种方法可在全球多种环境中应用。它将能够更具体地确定医疗服务所需的护理进步,以提高母乳喂养支持的有效性,并解决普遍存在的低估和未充分利用妇女经验数据来评估和指导医疗服务改进的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Establishing Methods to Assess Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative Compliance Using the Global Standards and Women's Self-Reported Experiences.

The World Health Organization recommends assessing compliance with key clinical practices of the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI; Steps 3-9) using birthing women's self-reports. Globally, compliance is mainly assessed using health staff reports, and the use of women's self-reports in selected countries has deviated from the Global Standards for the BFHI. Therefore, we aimed to provide insight into the appropriate method of incorporating women's self-reports in assessing compliance with Steps 3-9 of the BFHI. We developed questions and coding algorithms for assessing compliance with Steps 3-9 based on Global Standards for BFHI compliance, and implemented them via a cross-sectional survey of 302 women who gave birth to a live baby in Sri Lankan hospitals. Compliance with specific practices within each of Steps 3-9 and overall compliance with each step were described as percentages. Compliance with specific practices and each BFHI Step ranged from 15.9%-100% and 7.0%-100%, respectively. Our findings particularly emphasize the potentially enhanced usefulness and robustness of assessing all specific practices within BFHI key clinical steps and not focusing only on one practice within a step, to derive more useful health service guidance globally for capturing BFHI compliance and its impact on breastfeeding outcomes. This method could be translated across multiple settings globally. It would enable more specific identification of care advancements required by health services to improve the effectiveness of breastfeeding support and address the prevailing undervaluing and under-use of women's experiential data to evaluate and guide health service improvement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Human Lactation
Journal of Human Lactation 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
11.50%
发文量
100
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Committed to the promotion of diversity and equity in all our policies and practices, our aims are: To provide our readers and the international communities of clinicians, educators and scholars working in the field of lactation with current and quality-based evidence, from a broad array of disciplines, including the medical sciences, basic sciences, social sciences and the humanities. To provide student and novice researchers, as well as, researchers whose native language is not English, with expert editorial guidance while preparing their work for publication in JHL. In each issue, the Journal of Human Lactation publishes original research, original theoretical and conceptual articles, discussions of policy and practice issues, and the following special features: Advocacy: A column that discusses a ‘hot’ topic in lactation advocacy About Research: A column focused on an in-depth discussion of a different research topic each issue Lactation Newsmakers: An interview with a widely-recognized outstanding expert in the field from around the globe Research Commentary: A brief discussion of the issues raised in a specific research article published in the current issue Book review(s): Reviews written by content experts about relevant new publications International News Briefs: From major international lactation organizations.
期刊最新文献
Immunological Factors and Macronutrient Content in Human Milk From Women With Subclinical Mastitis. Considerations When Measuring Exclusive Breastfeeding. Bridging the Gap Between Lactation Care and Research in Human Lactation. Utilizing Lactation Acuity to Improve Lactation Services in a U.S. Hospital. Breastfeeding Intentions, Attitudes, and Knowledge Among Medical Students in Croatia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1