美国成年人的青少年照顾者:美国成年人的青少年照顾者:美国成年人的青少年照顾者:美国成年人的青少年照顾者:美国成年人的青少年照顾者:美国成年人的青少年照顾者:美国成年人的青少年照顾者

IF 3.6 1区 社会学 Q1 DEMOGRAPHY Demography Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1215/00703370-11383976
Katherine E M Miller, Joanna L Hart, Mateo Useche Rosania, Norma B Coe
{"title":"美国成年人的青少年照顾者:美国成年人的青少年照顾者:美国成年人的青少年照顾者:美国成年人的青少年照顾者:美国成年人的青少年照顾者:美国成年人的青少年照顾者:美国成年人的青少年照顾者","authors":"Katherine E M Miller, Joanna L Hart, Mateo Useche Rosania, Norma B Coe","doi":"10.1215/00703370-11383976","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A growing proportion of individuals adopt family caregiving roles. Family caregivers are the primary providers of long-term care in the United States yet limited federal policy supports exist, despite the known negative impacts of caregiving. There is also limited information about the prevalence of youth/young adult caregivers and the impacts of caregiving at formative ages in the United States. Our objective is to estimate the prevalence of youth caregivers and examine the association of caregiving with educational investments. We use the American Time Use Survey (2013-2019) to identify and describe youth caregivers (aged 15-18) and young adult caregivers (aged 19-22) and compare them with non-caregiving peers. We estimate that there are approximately 1,623,000 youth caregivers and 1,986,000 young adult caregivers, corresponding to 9.2% and 12.7% of these age groups, respectively. However, there is a wide range in the estimated prevalence per year, from approximately 364,000 to 2.8 million youth caregivers and from 353,000 to 2.2 million young adult caregivers, depending on caregiver definition. Unlike adult caregivers, we find that young men and women were nearly equally likely to provide care. We also find that non-White individuals are disproportionately represented as youth caregivers. Compared with non-caregiving peers, both youth and young adult caregivers are less likely to be enrolled in school and, among those enrolled in school, spend significantly less time on educational activities. Considering the association of caregiving among youth/young adults and education, policies supporting youth and young adult caregivers are critical.</p>","PeriodicalId":48394,"journal":{"name":"Demography","volume":" ","pages":"829-847"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11539003/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Youth Caregivers of Adults in the United States: Prevalence and the Association Between Caregiving and Education.\",\"authors\":\"Katherine E M Miller, Joanna L Hart, Mateo Useche Rosania, Norma B Coe\",\"doi\":\"10.1215/00703370-11383976\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A growing proportion of individuals adopt family caregiving roles. Family caregivers are the primary providers of long-term care in the United States yet limited federal policy supports exist, despite the known negative impacts of caregiving. There is also limited information about the prevalence of youth/young adult caregivers and the impacts of caregiving at formative ages in the United States. Our objective is to estimate the prevalence of youth caregivers and examine the association of caregiving with educational investments. We use the American Time Use Survey (2013-2019) to identify and describe youth caregivers (aged 15-18) and young adult caregivers (aged 19-22) and compare them with non-caregiving peers. We estimate that there are approximately 1,623,000 youth caregivers and 1,986,000 young adult caregivers, corresponding to 9.2% and 12.7% of these age groups, respectively. However, there is a wide range in the estimated prevalence per year, from approximately 364,000 to 2.8 million youth caregivers and from 353,000 to 2.2 million young adult caregivers, depending on caregiver definition. Unlike adult caregivers, we find that young men and women were nearly equally likely to provide care. We also find that non-White individuals are disproportionately represented as youth caregivers. Compared with non-caregiving peers, both youth and young adult caregivers are less likely to be enrolled in school and, among those enrolled in school, spend significantly less time on educational activities. Considering the association of caregiving among youth/young adults and education, policies supporting youth and young adult caregivers are critical.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48394,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Demography\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"829-847\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11539003/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Demography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1215/00703370-11383976\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DEMOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Demography","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/00703370-11383976","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

越来越多的人承担起家庭护理的角色。在美国,家庭照护者是长期照护的主要提供者,尽管照护的负面影响众所周知,但联邦政策支持却很有限。关于美国青少年/年轻成人照顾者的普遍程度以及在成长阶段照顾他人的影响的信息也很有限。我们的目标是估算青少年照顾者的普遍程度,并研究照顾与教育投资之间的关联。我们利用美国时间使用调查(2013-2019 年)来识别和描述青少年照顾者(15-18 岁)和年轻成人照顾者(19-22 岁),并将他们与不提供照顾的同龄人进行比较。我们估计,大约有 162.3 万名青少年照顾者和 198.6 万名年轻成人照顾者,分别占这些年龄组的 9.2% 和 12.7%。然而,根据对照顾者的定义,每年的估计流行率范围很广,从大约 364,000 到 280 万青少年照顾者,以及从 353,000 到 220 万年轻成人照顾者。与成年照顾者不同的是,我们发现青年男女提供照顾的可能性几乎相同。我们还发现,非白种人担任青少年照顾者的比例过高。与不提供照料的同龄人相比,青少年和年轻成人照料者入学的可能性较低,而在入学的照料者中,花费在教育活动上的时间明显较少。考虑到青年/年轻成人中的照顾者与教育之间的联系,支持青年和年轻成人照顾者的政策至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Youth Caregivers of Adults in the United States: Prevalence and the Association Between Caregiving and Education.

A growing proportion of individuals adopt family caregiving roles. Family caregivers are the primary providers of long-term care in the United States yet limited federal policy supports exist, despite the known negative impacts of caregiving. There is also limited information about the prevalence of youth/young adult caregivers and the impacts of caregiving at formative ages in the United States. Our objective is to estimate the prevalence of youth caregivers and examine the association of caregiving with educational investments. We use the American Time Use Survey (2013-2019) to identify and describe youth caregivers (aged 15-18) and young adult caregivers (aged 19-22) and compare them with non-caregiving peers. We estimate that there are approximately 1,623,000 youth caregivers and 1,986,000 young adult caregivers, corresponding to 9.2% and 12.7% of these age groups, respectively. However, there is a wide range in the estimated prevalence per year, from approximately 364,000 to 2.8 million youth caregivers and from 353,000 to 2.2 million young adult caregivers, depending on caregiver definition. Unlike adult caregivers, we find that young men and women were nearly equally likely to provide care. We also find that non-White individuals are disproportionately represented as youth caregivers. Compared with non-caregiving peers, both youth and young adult caregivers are less likely to be enrolled in school and, among those enrolled in school, spend significantly less time on educational activities. Considering the association of caregiving among youth/young adults and education, policies supporting youth and young adult caregivers are critical.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Demography
Demography DEMOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
2.90%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: Since its founding in 1964, the journal Demography has mirrored the vitality, diversity, high intellectual standard and wide impact of the field on which it reports. Demography presents the highest quality original research of scholars in a broad range of disciplines, including anthropology, biology, economics, geography, history, psychology, public health, sociology, and statistics. The journal encompasses a wide variety of methodological approaches to population research. Its geographic focus is global, with articles addressing demographic matters from around the planet. Its temporal scope is broad, as represented by research that explores demographic phenomena spanning the ages from the past to the present, and reaching toward the future. Authors whose work is published in Demography benefit from the wide audience of population scientists their research will reach. Also in 2011 Demography remains the most cited journal among population studies and demographic periodicals. Published bimonthly, Demography is the flagship journal of the Population Association of America, reaching the membership of one of the largest professional demographic associations in the world.
期刊最新文献
Why Are So Many U.S. Mothers Becoming Their Family's Primary Economic Support? A Data Portrait of Cisgender, Transgender, and Gender-Nonconforming Populations in the United States: A Research Note. Daily Diversity Flows: Racial and Ethnic Context Between Home and Work. Assessing Electronic Health Records for Describing Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities: A Research Note. Do Migrants Exhibit More Grit? A Research Note.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1