分娩恐惧、焦虑、抑郁和分娩自我效能的聚类分析。

{"title":"分娩恐惧、焦虑、抑郁和分娩自我效能的聚类分析。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jogn.2024.04.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To identify clusters of women based on anxiety, depression, fear of birth, and childbirth self-efficacy and factors associated with the clusters.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Cross-sectional survey.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Online in Sweden.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Pregnant women (<em>N</em> = 1,419).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We collected data through online questionnaires. We included scales to measure anxiety, depression, worries about and fear of birth, and self-efficacy in a kappa-means cluster analysis. We calculated odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals between clusters and background variables.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We identified 4 clusters based on severity: <em>Resourceful–Robust</em>, <em>Resourceful–Fearful</em>, <em>Vulnerable–Fearful</em>, and <em>Fragile–Fearful.</em> Participants in the <em>Resourceful–Fearful</em> and <em>Vulnerable–Fearful</em> clusters were more likely to report mental health problems than those in the <em>Resourceful–Robust</em> cluster. Participants in the <em>Vulnerable–Fearful</em> and <em>Fragile–Fearful</em> clusters were more likely to report mental health problems than those in the <em>Resourceful–Robust</em> cluster. Participants in the <em>Fragile–Fearful</em> cluster were more likely to be multiparous, report that their pregnancy was not normal, and prefer cesarean birth than those in the <em>Resourceful–Robust</em> cluster.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Women with childbirth fear may be vulnerable to anxiety and depression during the perinatal period, although the severity might vary. Self-efficacy might be a mediator against mental health problems. Findings demonstrated levels of severity, and the one-size-fits-all approach in Swedish health care may benefit from a more targeted approach for women with fear of childbirth.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54903,"journal":{"name":"Jognn-Journal of Obstetric Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing","volume":"53 5","pages":"Pages 522-533"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0884217524000716/pdfft?md5=64a458dd3d3ebf346e8902e0c3e92272&pid=1-s2.0-S0884217524000716-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cluster Analysis of Fear of Childbirth, Anxiety, Depression, and Childbirth Self-Efficacy\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jogn.2024.04.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To identify clusters of women based on anxiety, depression, fear of birth, and childbirth self-efficacy and factors associated with the clusters.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Cross-sectional survey.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Online in Sweden.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Pregnant women (<em>N</em> = 1,419).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We collected data through online questionnaires. We included scales to measure anxiety, depression, worries about and fear of birth, and self-efficacy in a kappa-means cluster analysis. We calculated odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals between clusters and background variables.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We identified 4 clusters based on severity: <em>Resourceful–Robust</em>, <em>Resourceful–Fearful</em>, <em>Vulnerable–Fearful</em>, and <em>Fragile–Fearful.</em> Participants in the <em>Resourceful–Fearful</em> and <em>Vulnerable–Fearful</em> clusters were more likely to report mental health problems than those in the <em>Resourceful–Robust</em> cluster. Participants in the <em>Vulnerable–Fearful</em> and <em>Fragile–Fearful</em> clusters were more likely to report mental health problems than those in the <em>Resourceful–Robust</em> cluster. Participants in the <em>Fragile–Fearful</em> cluster were more likely to be multiparous, report that their pregnancy was not normal, and prefer cesarean birth than those in the <em>Resourceful–Robust</em> cluster.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Women with childbirth fear may be vulnerable to anxiety and depression during the perinatal period, although the severity might vary. Self-efficacy might be a mediator against mental health problems. Findings demonstrated levels of severity, and the one-size-fits-all approach in Swedish health care may benefit from a more targeted approach for women with fear of childbirth.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jognn-Journal of Obstetric Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing\",\"volume\":\"53 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 522-533\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0884217524000716/pdfft?md5=64a458dd3d3ebf346e8902e0c3e92272&pid=1-s2.0-S0884217524000716-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jognn-Journal of Obstetric Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0884217524000716\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jognn-Journal of Obstetric Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0884217524000716","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的根据焦虑、抑郁、对分娩的恐惧和分娩自我效能感确定妇女群组以及与群组相关的因素:设计:横断面调查:地点:瑞典在线调查:方法:我们通过在线问卷收集数据:我们通过在线问卷收集数据。我们将测量焦虑、抑郁、对分娩的担忧和恐惧以及自我效能的量表纳入卡帕均值聚类分析。我们计算了聚类与背景变量之间的几率比,并得出了 95% 的置信区间:结果:我们根据严重程度确定了 4 个聚类:结果:我们根据严重程度确定了 4 个群组:足智多谋-稳健型、足智多谋-恐惧型、脆弱-恐惧型和脆弱-恐惧型。与 "资源丰富-稳健 "组群的参与者相比,"资源丰富-恐惧 "组群和 "脆弱-恐惧 "组群的参与者更有可能报告心理健康问题。在 "脆弱-恐惧 "群组和 "脆弱-恐惧 "群组中的参与者比在 "资源丰富-稳健 "群组中的参与者更有可能报告心理健康问题。与 "资源丰富 "组群的参与者相比,"脆弱恐惧 "组群的参与者更有可能是多胎妊娠、报告其妊娠不正常以及更倾向于剖腹产:有分娩恐惧的妇女在围产期可能容易患焦虑症和抑郁症,尽管严重程度可能有所不同。自我效能感可能是缓解心理健康问题的中介因素。研究结果表明了严重程度的不同,瑞典医疗保健中的 "一刀切 "方法可能会受益于针对分娩恐惧女性的更有针对性的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cluster Analysis of Fear of Childbirth, Anxiety, Depression, and Childbirth Self-Efficacy

Objective

To identify clusters of women based on anxiety, depression, fear of birth, and childbirth self-efficacy and factors associated with the clusters.

Design

Cross-sectional survey.

Setting

Online in Sweden.

Participants

Pregnant women (N = 1,419).

Methods

We collected data through online questionnaires. We included scales to measure anxiety, depression, worries about and fear of birth, and self-efficacy in a kappa-means cluster analysis. We calculated odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals between clusters and background variables.

Results

We identified 4 clusters based on severity: Resourceful–Robust, Resourceful–Fearful, Vulnerable–Fearful, and Fragile–Fearful. Participants in the Resourceful–Fearful and Vulnerable–Fearful clusters were more likely to report mental health problems than those in the Resourceful–Robust cluster. Participants in the Vulnerable–Fearful and Fragile–Fearful clusters were more likely to report mental health problems than those in the Resourceful–Robust cluster. Participants in the Fragile–Fearful cluster were more likely to be multiparous, report that their pregnancy was not normal, and prefer cesarean birth than those in the Resourceful–Robust cluster.

Conclusions

Women with childbirth fear may be vulnerable to anxiety and depression during the perinatal period, although the severity might vary. Self-efficacy might be a mediator against mental health problems. Findings demonstrated levels of severity, and the one-size-fits-all approach in Swedish health care may benefit from a more targeted approach for women with fear of childbirth.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
0
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: JOGNN is a premier resource for health care professionals committed to clinical scholarship that advances the health care of women and newborns. With a focus on nursing practice, JOGNN addresses the latest research, practice issues, policies, opinions, and trends in the care of women, childbearing families, and newborns. This peer-reviewed scientific and technical journal is highly respected for groundbreaking articles on important - and sometimes controversial - issues. Articles published in JOGNN emphasize research evidence and clinical practice, building both science and clinical applications. JOGNN seeks clinical, policy and research manuscripts on the evidence supporting current best practice as well as developing or emerging practice trends. A balance of quantitative and qualitative research with an emphasis on biobehavioral outcome studies and intervention trials is desired. Manuscripts are welcomed on all subjects focused on the care of women, childbearing families, and newborns.
期刊最新文献
Case Report of Dysphoric Milk Ejection Reflex. Meta-ethnography of the Experiences of Women of Color Who Survived Severe Maternal Morbidity or Birth Complications. Secondary Qualitative Analysis of Stigmatizing and Nonstigmatizing Language Used in Hospital Birth Settings. Mental Health Experiences of Muslim American Women During the Perinatal Period. Nurse Perceptions of Barriers to Infection Prevention and Control in Labor and Delivery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1